Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, wuvvum said:

@LightBulbFun

Automatic ✔️

ULEZ compliant ✔️

Room for a mobility scooter ✔️

Towbar fitted so gr8 4 towing Invacares ✔️

Looks a bit shit so unlikely to attract the attention of London council estate ne'er-do-wells ✔️

s-l1600.jpg

 

Top colour!

Posted
22 minutes ago, wuvvum said:

@LightBulbFun

Automatic ✔️

ULEZ compliant ✔️

Room for a mobility scooter ✔️

Towbar fitted so gr8 4 towing Invacares ✔️

Looks a bit shit so unlikely to attract the attention of London council estate ne'er-do-wells ✔️

s-l1600.jpg

 

its a shame that does not have a ramp or otherwise it would be a serious contender, (insurance is a reasonable £1K)

could stock up on Derby 100 lightbulbs while I was in the area too :mrgreen:

 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, LightBulbFun said:

its a shame that does not have a ramp or otherwise it would be a serious contender, (insurance is a reasonable £1K)

could stock up on Derby 100 lightbulbs while I was in the area too :mrgreen:

 

It's got a towbar, put the scooter on a trailer.

 

Edit: or something like this could be rigged up in the boot.

Screenshot_20231213-203824~2.png

Posted
13 minutes ago, LightBulbFun said:

(insurance is a reasonable £1K)

Even with the modifications declared?!

Posted
7 hours ago, Cavcraft said:

image.thumb.png.2c84c6f414849e257a92845fe9441bf2.png

Lomax kit car | eBay

'It provides a smooth and comfortable ride'

image.thumb.png.bc59266f5114f94af68e259011150d65.png

It's a fucking £1 car mat thrown on top of a recycled cheese grater, FFS.

Liverpool - has @brownnova written all over it.

Posted
23 minutes ago, JJ0063 said:

Even with the modifications declared?!

Isn't that just a standard Kangoo with the rear seat missing?  It hasn't got a lowered floor.

Posted
42 minutes ago, matt79 said:

One for the 'Cars you never knew exisited' thread? Ive never seen this model of Megane as an estate before (I'll bet the missing trim piece from the top of the tailgate will be easy* to source)

https://www.facebook.com/groups/647102988689718/permalink/7003298876403399/?sale_post_id=7003298876403399&mibextid=uJjRxr

410450935_2159780124386373_8087197307015399331_n.thumb.jpg.2cdae92f0befbf9789649c2014335701.jpg

Funny, I posted the same thing (well, different car) a few weeks ago. It actually looks alright, but they can't have sold many

Posted
11 minutes ago, Mr Pastry said:

Isn't that just a standard Kangoo with the rear seat missing?  It hasn't got a lowered floor.

Colour change, tinted windows, removal of rear seats 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Spottedlaurel said:

Be like Miss SL, but with over 120,000 fewer miles on the clock and a hatchback:

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.b3c340eb1927b083ed7c0dcf4f7723cd.jpg

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/386262243080

That seller comes up quite a lot on here. Look at the deciduous trees in the other photos - they were taken probably six months ago. He seems to really struggle to shift his stock.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, JJ0063 said:

Colour change, tinted windows, removal of rear seats 

I think the rear seats are detachable anyway, some of them had tinted windows from new, colour change?  Ok these things should be declared, but how much difference will they actually make to the premium?

 

Posted
32 minutes ago, JJ0063 said:

Colour change, tinted windows, removal of rear seats 

Do certain colours attract higher premiums or does the fact you've changed the colour in itself cause a higher premium?  Or is it more just that any change from standard so you should declare it?  

Daft question, but if you have the colour of your alloys changed, say from silver to grey when refurbed, should you declare that as well?

Posted
17 minutes ago, willswitchengage said:

That seller comes up quite a lot on here. Look at the deciduous trees in the other photos - they were taken probably six months ago. He seems to really struggle to shift his stock.

Indeed, I've seen his ad's quite often over the years. He seems to do well in hoovering up tidy-looking older models, wonder if he's buying direct from dealers or through trade auctions?

Posted
49 minutes ago, Mr Pastry said:

I think the rear seats are detachable anyway, some of them had tinted windows from new, colour change?  Ok these things should be declared, but how much difference will they actually make to the premium?

 

You’re right re seats - I’m just stating the facts that if someone physically removes seats and permanently runs without them, it’s a declarable modification rather than someone folding their rear seats for a run to the tip.

Re the tints, that excuse won’t wash - they’re clearly blacked out side windows and are non standard, ignorance isn’t bliss - It’s a modification. 
 

The simple answer is it could potentially make a massive difference. I fairly regularly get customers come to me saying they’ve called their insurer to declare a minor mod and now they’ve been given 7 days to find alternate cover. For someone like LBF there’s a potential he’ll a quote wiped out completely as a young, inexperienced driver. 
 

Believe it or not a few months back I had someone approach me desperately needing help as their insurer had cancelled their insurance because they'd called called to let them know they’d had PPF fitted. Clear fucking protective wrap. Mental.

43 minutes ago, Erebus said:

Do certain colours attract higher premiums or does the fact you've changed the colour in itself cause a higher premium?  Or is it more just that any change from standard so you should declare it?  

Daft question, but if you have the colour of your alloys changed, say from silver to grey when refurbed, should you declare that as well?

The colour itself shouldn’t, there are myths about certain colours being involved in more accidents but relatively speaking it’s bollocks 

Its the fact its modified, your typical mainstream insurers like Churchill, Direct Line etc will flat out refuse to cover most mods, whereas specialists like where I work will actually often offer a reduced premium with modifications. 
 

Re the wheel colour, its down to the insurer but yes technically unless you have the wheels refurbed in silver if they were silver from the factory, black if black from the factory etc - a like for like colour (pedantic brigade I don’t mean down to the colour code, just the actual colour being the same) 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, JJ0063 said:

You’re right re seats - I’m just stating the facts that if someone physically removes seats and runs without them, it’s a declarable modification rather than someone folding their rear seats for a run to the tip.

If the seats are designed to be removable as a feature of the car then is it still declarable if they’re taken out?

Posted
16 minutes ago, Rust Collector said:

If the seats are designed to be removable as a feature of the car then is it still declarable if they’re taken out?

I think it’d be a very grey area, if someone was for example a gardener and had a Citroen Picasso so removed the detachable seats and used it as a van for business, I think it’s fair to say most insurers would want to have it declared as a permanent modification. 
 

I know there are some insurers that are stupidly anal, if you speak to the right people it should be no real issue at all but it’s also very case dependent I’d say. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr Pastry said:

Isn't that just a standard Kangoo with the rear seat missing?  It hasn't got a lowered floor.

Yep - not a converted van, no lowered floor/ramp, uncut rear bumper, standard doors etc.  Straightforward van.  You might want to investigate boot hoists for a scooter/wheelchair as an alternative to a converted van.  Unless you need one converts have some significant drawbacks - small fuel tanks for 1 (mines 20 litres!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...