Cars, Lasses and Lads - A Photo Sharing Thread

[HMC]

[hairnet]

[Dick Cheeseburger]

[bangernomics]

[Timewaster]

On 24/02/2022 at 06:02, Austat said:

Interesting to compare the ruler straight lines off the Lada with the pleasing curvature of the.. 

er.. 

Surfboard. 

[bangernomics]

[Mrs6C]

@Rod/b - your post has been hidden as it falls foul of AS rules.

[anonymous user]

Another one of racing driver Mrs Eccles 

[castros_bro]

[hairnet]

9 minutes ago, anonymous user said:

Another one of racing driver Mrs Eccles 

yes binky when you slam it into fourth nuvolari would be jealous

[hairnet]

@Conan

[Rod/b]

2 hours ago, Mrs6C said:

@Rod/b - your post has been hidden as it falls foul of AS rules.

Jesus wept. There wasn’t even any bifter on show. 

[Rod/b]

2 minutes ago, Rod/b said:

Jesus wept. There wasn’t even any bifter on show. 

In fact i’d go as far as to say that @Mrs6Cyou’ve overstepped the mark, unless you consider a pair of tits to be Pornography, which is a bit Mary Whitehouse pearl-clutchingly prudish. 

[bangernomics]

[martc]

[martc]

[Cookiesouwest]

3 hours ago, Rod/b said:

In fact i’d go as far as to say that @Mrs6Cyou’ve overstepped the mark, unless you consider a pair of tits to be Pornography, which is a bit Mary Whitehouse pearl-clutchingly prudish. 

No she hasn't.

Read the original post that opened the thread.

Many will not regard what you posted as dodgy or offensive. But the rules is the rules.

The other place has a thread you may prefer, iro allowable content.

[Rod/b]

8 hours ago, Cookiesouwest said:

No she hasn't.

Read the original post that opened the thread.

Many will not regard what you posted as dodgy or offensive. But the rules is the rules.

The other place has a thread you may prefer, iro allowable content.

Wind it in, old bean. Rules is rules, and the rules say “no porn”, and i didn’t post any.

It’s situations when the admins see as it their place to go past the forum rules when they’re giving it the typical admin little Hitler that always causes issues here.  Nobody asked the admins to administer user imposed thread-level arbitrary content requests.

 

 

 

 

[LightBulbFun]

14 minutes ago, Rod/b said:

Wind it in, old bean. Rules is rules, and the rules say “no porn”, and i didn’t post any.

It’s situations when the admins see as it their place to go past the forum rules when they’re giving it the typical admin little Hitler that always causes issues here.  Nobody asked the admins to administer user imposed thread-level arbitrary content requests.

as much as I do like to see a nice pair of tits, the rules laid out on this thread do state the photos have to be safe for work

On 23/02/2022 at 22:06, Dick Longbridge said:

So rulez - one oldish PHOTO and keep it SFW. Save the gags for another thread. Just don't bloody ruin it for everyone else. 

and I dont think your boss would be very impressed if he leaned over while you browsed the forum saw on your screen a pair of tits flash up, nor would he be very convinced if you said

"I was only looking at the picture for the Trabant 601 Sonderwunsch Estate she was resting them on!"  even if that is the truth on this forum!  

(theres a joke about fake tits/implants and Duroplast in there somewhere... )

[castros_bro]

Moving pictures or one bloke and his (this rig is not s) vehicles but only one at a time..

 

 

[Sigmund Fraud]

19 hours ago, Rod/b said:

Mary Whitehouse pearl-clutchingly prudish. 

[Dick Cheeseburger]

When I started the thread, I did wonder if it would be hit with the moderator stick. 

@Rod/bI don't think your post came under 'pornography', hence in that respect shouldn't have been sent to the virtual bin. 

However, I did mention at the start of the thread  'just keep it SFW'.  Much as Bristols combined with BLMC products are enjoyable, for the sake of keeping the thread running smoothly lets keep the Bristols covered. 

Back to the fred...

[MJK 24]

[MJK 24]

[MJK 24]

[MJK 24]

[Rustybullethole]

[captain_70s]

1 hour ago, Dick Longbridge said:

When I started the thread, I did wonder if it would be hit with the moderator stick. 

@Rod/bI don't think your post came under 'pornography', hence in that respect shouldn't have been sent to the virtual bin. 

I'm of the understanding that the forum hosts do not allow content of an adult nature. I suspect baps out imagery could fall foul of that, given how much of the world still follows the religious hold over of nudity = bad.

[155V6]

[155V6]