Jump to content

Ask a Shiter


warren t claim

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are there any threads on here about buying and running leaves? (Or, indicating how well they might stand up to a 50 mile daily commute for a few years?)

Posted

stupid and hypothetical question...

 

running a vehicle with no air filter fitted, but retaining all the stock air box and intake gubbinz. Assuming you live in the home counties (rather than Saudi Arabia for example) and don't accidentally ingest an ENTIRE BIRD like that person on here found when he went to change the filter, how much damage would it do to the engine/would it dramatically shorten the expected lifespan?

 

Would the lack of resistance inprove power noticeably?

 

I have no intention of doing it, but another thread made me wonder.

Posted

stupid and hypothetical question...

 

running a vehicle with no air filter fitted, but retaining all the stock air box and intake gubbinz. Assuming you live in the home counties (rather than Saudi Arabia for example) and don't accidentally ingest an ENTIRE BIRD like that person on here found when he went to change the filter, how much damage would it do to the engine/would it dramatically shorten the expected lifespan?

 

Would the lack of resistance inprove power noticeably?

 

I have no intention of doing it, but another thread made me wonder.

In theory without the filter the air intake will work unrestricted so yes, power would be up a bit. But, I wouldn't do it as your just going to suck dust and crap into the engine. It wouldn't kill it over night but it's not good!

Posted

stupid and hypothetical question...

 

running a vehicle with no air filter fitted, but retaining all the stock air box and intake gubbinz. Assuming you live in the home counties (rather than Saudi Arabia for example) and don't accidentally ingest an ENTIRE BIRD like that person on here found when he went to change the filter, how much damage would it do to the engine/would it dramatically shorten the expected lifespan?

 

Would the lack of resistance inprove power noticeably?

 

On most cars it's unlikely to improve power at all.  The reason being that the air filter (being negligible difference in £-cost to the car maker, between one size and the next)  is over spec'd re. through-flow-of-air ..on almost every car.  This is to allow the standard filter to be usable for up to 100,000 miles, between major services ..in the worst environmental conditions the car is like to encounter.      

 

The air intake into the engine is dependent on the engine speed and capacity, the timing and size of valves and the gas flowing around them,  the air intake venturi and air flow control,  etc.,  .. and NOT the surface area of its air filter.

 

As an illustration, let's say the intake venturi is dia. 2" (approx Area : 6.4 sq.in) and the air filter element is a small one at  8" x 8", which has a surface area of let's say 25" (within its the folds) x 8" wide = 200 sq.in.   And by design the filter restricts 15% of the air flow through it .. well that still leaves 85% of 200 = 170 sq.in.   It'll take a fair amount of dust compounded by humidity and engine breather fumes to block that down to 6.4 sq.inches.

 

If the car is being driven flat out and with foot still hard against the boards then perhaps on some ordinary* really-economy-model of small family saloon car - the filter may be just a little restrictive.  And then again, if the plonker has not changed his air filter in 15 years and it's full of pollen and dirt road dust, then yes a K&N., or no air filter., or even a new standard filter will show an improvement.  But for most (do I hear you all writing in saying but my super duper.. etc.) cars ..when routine maintenance is followed - then for normal (..fast) road use the filter's element is unlikely to be restrictive in the least. 

 

To confirm the supposition, I might add that I converted my 3.8ltr Jag from its 1966 air filter (well it looked original :shock: ) to a new one from the 4ltr XJ300 model.  I did this because the original air filter drew hot air from above the exhaust manifolds ..and I wanted cooler air from under the front of the car).  Anyway, despite being designed for a slightly bigger and faster spinning engine, my Jag's carburetor jetting remained correct. Whereas, if air flow had been greater (..for a set throttle setting) then the motor would have run lean - and its jetting would have then needed to be adjusted. 

 

However, the teaching of my mentor (Tony Stevens, who long ago was the chief engine designer for Rootes Cars) were still correct.. Colder air (intake) into the engine is more dense than hot air,  and so although the through-flow volume of intake air was the same, when mixed with fuel and ignited ..the bang was bigger and more engine power was produced.  ..enough to be obvious (despite the jetting being unaltered). 

 

How much damage without an air filter element, and how quickly ..depends on whether you live and daily drive down a farm dirt track (as I do) or are strictly an urban fine-weather driver.. It depends on where the air filter (sans-element) is sucking from  in the engine bay and the air circulation around that (..you'll see that some engine bays stay remarkably clean whereas others are always seen to be dusty).  It also depends on how the run of air filter pipes are designed (some get rid of some particles by centrifuge and velocity drops). 

 

In short, there are really too many variables to answer accurately but as a ballpoint I'd guess* in urban conditions : dust, pollen, minute crap particles in our atmosphere and along roads (see how snowy-white slush remains !) sucked through the air-intake-control valve and in the cylinder bores might reduce their useful lifespan by as much as 15-25%.   But that is only a guess.

 

Hope it helps,

Bfg. ;) 

 

post-20151-0-45171100-1510008827_thumb.jpg

^ My '66 S-Type. The air filter case seen here is empty and its perforations closed off ..but it served well as a manifold. 

 

The air filter & element are tucked under the front wing ..drawing colder air from the front of the car (below) . .

post-20151-0-92652900-1510009016_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

Yes, it's super-stupid question time  :all_coholic:

 

Smog-era yanks. Can they be 'de-smogged', or were the restrictions designed into the actual engines?

 

Basically, I have a soft spot for 80's mid-range saloons and would quite like to cruise round like William Petersen in To Live & Die In L.A., but I suspect that a wheezing 100bhp lump would get rather annoying very quickly. Are there usually straight-forward ways to make them more driveable, or should I just stick to euro barges?

Posted

Yes, it's super-stupid question time  :all_coholic:

 

Smog-era yanks. Can they be 'de-smogged', or were the restrictions designed into the actual engines?

 

Basically, I have a soft spot for 80's mid-range saloons and would quite like to cruise round like William Petersen in To Live & Die In L.A., but I suspect that a wheezing 100bhp lump would get rather annoying very quickly. Are there usually straight-forward ways to make them more driveable, or should I just stick to euro barges?

 

depends on what car , but alot of it comes off - fit a carb kit /headers /cam etc to restore to normal 

Posted

.

^ I would tend to agree ..aside from cam profile, engine capacity, compression ratio, and possibly piston crowns - the internal guts of an internal combustion engine tend to be very much the same between any car builder's standard saloons and their more sporty ones.  Much of (pre-catalytic) de-smogging boiled down to recirculating (..& therefore burning) crankcase fumes, and carburation (to avoid unspent fuel and carbon from getting into the atmosphere).  Along with a fair degree of smoke and mirrors to stop the driver hoofing it, such as longer accelerator pedals ! and the final gear ratio being different.   

 

Just a suggestion but.. perhaps the safest bet in finding superficially smothered performance is to look and see which particular examples of those '80s mid-range saloons' were popular on their race tracks.  Inevitably there are tuning kits still available for them ..to release their potential !

 

;)

Posted

good chance a 70s car has had it all removed and messed with already

Posted

Does anyone know a car I am likely to find in a breakers that will have heated seats which are heated both on the base and on the back? Bonus points if they are fairly comfortable seats too.

 

I don't know about comfort, but there are some Golf V/ Beetle/ Jetta/ Audi A3 with both backrest and cushion heating.

Posted

I don't know about comfort, but there are some Golf V/ Beetle/ Jetta/ Audi A3 with both backrest and cushion heating.

 

or ebay seat heater kit for 30-60£ to fit to any seat

Posted

got a car in the family with factory xenons , seems it needs a new d2s bulb , now ecp and the like want 60-120£ for a bulb , ebay has no name ones for a fiver all the way up 

 

is there a semi trusted brand /seller of something reasonably priced or do i have to go grab a used one from a scrapper

Posted

Don't bother with scrap. They dim with age, so if the car has done a lot of miles, they'll be a lot dimmer than new. 

 

I have seen reasonable reviews from here: https://www.autobulbsdirect.co.uk/d2s-xenon-hid-bulbs/

 

Watch out, there are loads of fakes around.

yeah mine field...kinda what im getting at should i pay £5 knowing its fake vs £30-40 for a fake in a philips box lol

 

what sort of life should they last?   is it gonna stand out if i replace one ?

Posted

yeah mine field...kinda what im getting at should i pay £5 knowing its fake vs £30-40 for a fake in a philips box lol

 

what sort of life should they last?   is it gonna stand out if i replace one ?

Put it this way, my 2007 Civic in 140k miles has never had any replaced from the factory, my 2010 A4 in 164k miles has never had any replaced from the factory and my old 2005 Laguna II in 100k miles never appeared to have had any replaced! All genuine premium bulbs. Basically they usually dim over time or fail outright. Often its the drive circuitry that goes first. The burning when on doesn't shorten the life, its the switching on and warm up that really wears them. Not saying that they never die or fail, but they generally last a very long time and far longer than a filament bulb.

 

Make sure the lights are off before you put any hands around or near them. They fire up in the kV range and drive them at high voltages.

Posted

fair enough cheers...might be worth stumping up for a known brand then if its gonna last the life of the car

Posted

Does anyone know a car I am likely to find in a breakers that will have heated seats which are heated both on the base and on the back? Bonus points if they are fairly comfortable seats too.

 

The first car I had with heated seats was a Volvo 145 estate - very comfortable.. It also had a very slick gear knob overdrive switch for three of its four gears. Best overdrive I've yet known. :)

 

In recent years I've been driving an '04 Chrysler Voyager which also has heated seats (for me - essential with leather) which are a very different style to the squarish armchairs of the Volvo.  In the Chrysler - the electrically adjusted seats are compromised by poor ergonomics in its driving position (even I find them an inch too high).  The fabric seats of my previous '96 Voyager were manually adjusted, much lighter weight, softer, more comfortable (..for me), and generally warmer anyway than the later model's top-of-the-range leather ones, but both have imo too short a seat squab (not enough length to support my lengthy legs).  

 

The squarer style of Volvo armchairs, or the else the surprising rounded and very much more modern looking but shorter Chrysler seats - may be determined by what fits into your project. ?

 

Fabric seats tend to offer more material grip for fast cornering, without the necessity of having huge side bolsters to keep you in place. However, leather seats do look nice, are easier to slip into, and as long as they are fed every so often ..tend to be longer lasting.  For my old Citroen - I'm planning to have the existing seat frames recovered with leather side bolsters (which makes slipping in and out of the car very much easier) and fabric centre panels for warmth, general comfort, and grip.

 

Btw., I've noted that lady friends often do not like heated seats.  

 

Hope that helps

Bfg ;)   

Posted

Saab did a 3.0T in the older shaped 9-5s.

 

I tried to read up on this 200hp engine and found out it was a typically quirky Saab engine and I was quickly out of my depth understanding how it would all work.

 

Could anyone who knows about it dumb it down several notches?

 

It must be a silky smooth V6 with a lovely torque curve, but I'm surprised it hasn't got more than 200hp.

Posted

Wasn't it just a Vauxhall V6 engine?

 

Fundamentally yes, but the turbo version was unique to SAAB. The reason it's so low on power is that it has a miniature turbo considering its capacity, which is interestingly only fed exhaust gases from one cylinder bank ! Presumably something they did to improve torque at lower rpm ?

  • Like 1
Posted

This listing appeared on eBay yesterday afternoon - https://m.ebay.co.uk/itm/citroen-ax-race-parts/253247054827?hash=item3af6b363eb:g:irMAAOSweZJaAbtz

 

It's described as Citroen AX race parts, which was more than enough for me to wazz a bid on. I've tried to find out what's included in the haul of parts. The description is simply 'i am selling ax race parts off a race car that we have cut up as it was not good to race no more'.

It looks similar to a pile of scrap to me but can anyone help with spotting good/useful/noisy/worthwhile items in the images before I spunk all my money on (more) rusty useless shit?

 

post-13750-0-90149900-1510136342_thumb.jpg

 

post-13750-0-09272800-1510136356_thumb.jpg

 

post-13750-0-02005900-1510136366_thumb.jpg

Posted

Solid discs and 3 stud hubs say "cooking AX" to me, rather than race.

 

Usual swap is to 4 stud and votr/s brakes?

Posted

Three stud hubs, oe looking exhaust, miscellaneous oily shit, road tyres....race parts? Maybe the steering wheel?

Verdict - worthless shit.

Posted

I suspect the only racing that AX did was banger racing it all looks standard stuff just about worth the tenner if you want spares

Posted

Looks like a pile of shit to me, about the only thing I’d spare the tip would be the wooden mallet on the first picture.

Posted

Thanks everyone, you've all confirmed what I thought. The exhaust is of interest as mine is like a lace doily but other than that it would just be spares that are probably worse than what's already on the car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...