Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, garethj said:

Doesn’t look bad although he mentions the negative being the interior and helpfully doesn’t show a single interior picture 😂
 

not sure how much he’s after though, he doesn’t mention exactly the price he’s after whatsoever…..

Posted
1 hour ago, garethj said:

What looks like a Gentry kit car but is perhaps impossible to register.

Listed as “garage find” but to be perfectly honest I don’t think it took much searching once you made a start.

image.thumb.png.cee3e6890be6ab62aa6fcff33a2d9b1e.png
 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/134520018482?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=9UMgZQ-lQoC&sssrc=2349624&ssuid=y9xs1hiVQ9O&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY

morbid curiosity got the better of me so I checked and its registered already, or should I say still retains the Identity of the 1954 Morris Minor I presume it was was constructed from? 

tis correctly registered as a Convertible at least LOL

Posted
1 hour ago, D.E said:

These four prototypes differ from the production models by having a handmade front bumper assembly and a chromium plated rear Allegro Series 3 bumper, which sadly, were not carried forward for the production models.

Yea, ok not convinced M9

  • Haha 2
Posted
56 minutes ago, LightBulbFun said:

morbid curiosity got the better of me so I checked and its registered already, or should I say still retains the Identity of the 1954 Morris Minor I presume it was was constructed from? 

tis correctly registered as a Convertible at least LOL

The advert says that it’s just a numberplate sitting close to the car, not that it’s registered with it.  Bizarre!

A Morris Minor has a monocoque construction and this has a ladder frame so it would be quite a stretch to say it’s the same car?

  • Like 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, garethj said:

The advert says that it’s just a numberplate sitting close to the car, not that it’s registered with it.  Bizarre!

Yeah but the VIN plate nailed screwed to the side of the car is another matter :) 

39 minutes ago, garethj said:

A Morris Minor has a monocoque construction and this has a ladder frame so it would be quite a stretch to say it’s the same car?

indeed thats why I worded things how I did, however the whole identity thing, really depends on when exactly it was constructed

back in the 1980's and before times, rules concerning kit cars where a lot more relaxed then they are now

for example IIRC in the early 80's you only really needed the axels from a donor car and it could still retain the donor cars original identity! (although usually you would change the vehicle make/model on the logbook to whichever the kit car was, but not always, seen a good few Lomax's registered as 2CV's still for example)

so this may seem quite dodgy at first but could be well be completely legitimate

 

or it could be completely dodgy still, nothing stops someone pinching the VIN plate from a Morris Minor and nailing it to the side of their MG lookalike kit car LOL

 

as an aside note on the Morris Minor Monocoque thing, I seem to recall reading Travellers or at least the Utility variants (Van/pickup) did have separate chassis still? so could it be built upon one of those? 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, LightBulbFun said:

as an aside note on the Morris Minor Monocoque thing, I seem to recall reading Travellers or at least the Utility variants (Van/pickup) did have separate chassis still? so could it be built upon one of those? 

The Minor van/pickup had a separate chassis, but the Traveller used basically the saloon platform.

The kit car looks to have a Triumph engine etc. but I don't think it's a Gentry, which IIRC had an aluminium body and was a lot better proportioned, and could be mistaken for the real thing.

As you say it may have been legitimately registered at the time, when it was all a bit of a grey area and it often depended on what the builder told the  LVLO.

Bit of an odd one.  And not worth wasting time on, because it will never be quite right, IMO. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, D.E said:

 

9 hours ago, High Jetter said:

These four prototypes differ from the production models by having a handmade front bumper assembly and a chromium plated rear Allegro Series 3 bumper, which sadly, were not carried forward for the production models.

Yea, ok not convinced M9

It may sound unlikely, but it's totally true!  I have known the seller for 25 years and can vouch for him, not that anyone on here is likely to want to buy it.  I was also at the Gaydon auction he mentions where one of the other prototypes sold; another friend wanted to buy it but it went above their budget.

Posted
1 hour ago, cort16 said:

 

340641458_943042456938108_42168537872419

Scotland is like Auschwitz for Mazdas. Reminds me of this Punto that collapsed after the most minor of speed bumps near my gaff

IMG20220608085728.thumb.jpg.f44d131535bc9a2bdb82c0f5f04f7387.jpg

IMG20220608085701.thumb.jpg.12144c862cfa5797a28d467246cb8115.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, cort16 said:

This is nice, the lack of rusty front wings and huge hole in the drivers seat makes me nervous

1c351c754d204bf285770eb7f868acb5.jpg

6a5b8ea515a14a8c9c9552726939a054.jpg

For seating the children you don't like

5c76a3368e0048ceb36e4ae9b139d7de.jpg

 

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202304116172904

Judging by the steering wheel and wheels(neither of which are cheap) someone must have loved the car. Easily understandable considering it's the best color you could get these in.

  • Like 2
Posted

Those rear facing seats are for Spaniels, not children.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Schaefft said:

Judging by the steering wheel and wheels(neither of which are cheap) someone must have loved the car. Easily understandable considering it's the best color you could get these in.

Japanese Import.... Hence the spec, and condition. 1993 and Imported 2017 - So lasted in Japan for a long time - Given their draconian roadworthiness laws, I'm not surprised at the condition!

Posted
2 minutes ago, Volksy said:

Japanese Import.... Hence the spec, and condition. 1993 and Imported 2017 - So lasted in Japan for a long time - Given their draconian roadworthiness laws, I'm not surprised at the condition!

In that case it's an absolute steal!

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Schaefft said:

In that case it's an absolute steal!

Yeh, I'd say it's possibly one of the best - despite the mileage. Sadly I don't have £2600! 

Posted

These are starting look almost funky 

s-l1600.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...