Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, AnnoyingPentium said:

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/203719743018?hash=item2f6ea4962a:g:APQAAOSwQRNhhT-X

Oh my god, it might actually be a reasonably priced car!

s-l1600.jpg

Where's the catch???

The difference is that that would've been £500 based on age and general desirability until recently. It might be worth that now, but it's a weird one. Not many people want a 2001 Ford Focus even at low mileage. The target market is surely people like us

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, horriblemercedes said:

The difference is that that would've been £500 based on age and general desirability until recently. It might be worth that now, but it's a weird one. Not many people want a 2001 Ford Focus even at low mileage. The target market is surely people like us

I've been on the lookout for a 2.0 petrol non-ST170 and they don't come up often, everyone bought 1.6s at the time I think.

I agree, I think seller knows they're rare and getting rarer, and could well have an Escort-style following before long.

It's a great colour, good spec and looks tidy enough, at least on top. Probably a few gremlins with that mileage though, but nothing that ForeSkin couldn't sort.

Posted
12 minutes ago, grogee said:

I've been on the lookout for a 2.0 petrol non-ST170 and they don't come up often, everyone bought 1.6s at the time I think.

I agree, I think seller knows they're rare and getting rarer, and could well have an Escort-style following before long.

It's a great colour, good spec and looks tidy enough, at least on top. Probably a few gremlins with that mileage though, but nothing that ForeSkin couldn't sort.

I agree, I think it looks like a decent car. I just meant that until recently, any X-reg Focus was a very hard sell at £1500

Posted
3 hours ago, D.E said:

£460 S500, spares or repair but seller doesn't specify the things wrong with it.

https://www.gumtree.com/p/mercedes-benz/mercedes-s-class-s500/1426166925

s-l800.webp

The things wrong:
1. OSF does not exist 
2. Headlamp resembles B&W chicken breast in fog 
3. Suspension depressed
4. Space saver on NSR (new buyer can spend longer being shit) 
5. Yes

Posted
9 minutes ago, sdkrc said:

Does anyone need an upside down Corsa here? If so, you're in luck

Cheaper option is to buy one that's the right way up and just tilt your head a bit

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/NOT-BARN-FIND-UPSIDE-DOWN-CAR-AUTOMOBILIA-/255392964261

Screenshot_2022-02-18-18-31-28-06_260528048de7f2f358f0056f785be619.jpg

So basically an Oz one, wouldn't that make it a Holden Barina? Haha.

  • Haha 2
Posted
10 hours ago, Dyslexic Viking said:

You shit on a newspaper and throw it out the window.

You have some weird personal habits! 😁

  • Haha 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, AnnoyingPentium said:

That one's been on the bay for a while now. BDs are brilliant cars and massively underrated in general. However, the fella's deluded if he thinks he'll get anywhere near 2.3k for that particular example.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, goosey said:

Perkins 4236 conversion? 
 

it may have been re-bodied at some point in its life but retained the original chassis 

That may be true, but if it has had a different body, a different interior and a different engine fitted, if memory serves it no longer has enough points on the DVLA score system to keep its original identity.

Also a 4.236 makes about 75 bhp and is flat out at about 3,000 rpm so that is going to be slow AF.  Although it'd probably drive up a vertical cliff in low range.

Posted
45 minutes ago, wuvvum said:

That may be true, but if it has had a different body, a different interior and a different engine fitted, if memory serves it no longer has enough points on the DVLA score system to keep its original identity.

Also a 4.236 makes about 75 bhp and is flat out at about 3,000 rpm so that is going to be slow AF.  Although it'd probably drive up a vertical cliff in low range.

Ad states its a 300tdi which further suggests they've just stuck the three door's ID on a 90s five door. 

Posted
1 hour ago, wuvvum said:

That may be true, but if it has had a different body, a different interior and a different engine fitted, if memory serves it no longer has enough points on the DVLA score system to keep its original identity.

Also a 4.236 makes about 75 bhp and is flat out at about 3,000 rpm so that is going to be slow AF.  Although it'd probably drive up a vertical cliff in low range.

May have been rebodied years ago before the rules were tightened up, Back in the 90s my dad built a “coiler” which was a cut down Range Rover chassis and running gear but with a heavily modified a series 1 body but it was retained the series 1 ID 
 

Even with those power figures ( which for the time were pretty reasonable) A 4236 was a popular conversion back in the day and quite sort after, I even remember people converting Range Rovers to the Perkins 4203 which my dad had fitted in his series 2a and is the only vehicle I have ever snapped a half shaft in and yes that was slow and you needed arms like Popeye to turn the steering wheel 

Posted
10 minutes ago, leafsprung said:

Ad states its a 300tdi which further suggests they've just stuck the three door's ID on a 90s five door. 

My bad, it was mentioned earlier that it was registered as a 3.8 diesel which threw me a off 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...