eBay tat volume 3.

62,728 · December 16, 2022

10 minutes ago, wesacosa said:

I do quite fancy ticking one of these orf the list

me too, I wouldn't be embarrassed to drive one, but I would be annoyed finding it tipped on its side every Friday night.

3,375 · December 16, 2022

13 minutes ago, wesacosa said:

I do quite fancy ticking one of these orf the list

They’re massive fun, I have memories of absolutely flying down the a3 in my old one, and definitely hitting corners a bit too quickly, I never rolled it though I’m proud to say

23,870 · December 16, 2022

https://www.gumtree.com/p/citroen/citroen-ax-hatchback-1993-manual-954-cc-3-doors-easy-project-/1421787656

3,350 · December 16, 2022

This is a 1967 MGB, apparently

22,736 · December 16, 2022

3 minutes ago, neil1971 said:

This is a 1967 MGB, apparently

Last taxed in 1981. Well, not this one, but the one the id came from for the ring-a-ding-dinger.

Selling for his uncle* too. WCPGW?

9,047 · December 16, 2022

I rather fancy the Moggy behind it ..... I was wondering if the MG is like a lot of the 'tax exempt' Defenders that are rolling around on the V5 for a Ser 2a?

129,702 · December 16, 2022

Skyteam Ace 125 Motorbike (Learner Legal) (Cafe Racer) (Honda Replica) | eBay

'Front puncture (I have a spare that I can supply at no extra charge)'

Who can resist a spare puncture?

9,274 · December 16, 2022

4 hours ago, Dick Longbridge said:

Last taxed in 1981. Well, not this one, but the one the id came from for the ring-a-ding-dinger.

Selling for his uncle* too. WCPGW?

Why bother with the ring a ding ding as it'll be tax exempt anyway.

23,870 · December 16, 2022

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/185700762520?hash=item2b3ca0c398:g:JPcAAOSwPmVjmoGu

22,736 · December 16, 2022

10 minutes ago, busmansholiday said:

Why bother with the ring a ding ding as it'll be tax exempt anyway.

I'm guessing the original shell consisted of rust flakes and a vin plate.

24,834 · December 17, 2022

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/6099167560148260/?hoisted=false&ref=search&referral_code=null&referral_story_type=post&tracking=browse_serp%3A2dacef3f-5d72-4dd1-a964-7b2df971215b

4,841 · December 17, 2022

9 hours ago, busmansholiday said:

Why bother with the ring a ding ding as it'll be tax exempt anyway.

It was probably given the fake ID some time between 2007 and 2012 before rolling tax exemption was resumed. I cannot understand doing it on something so obviously wrong but there are many cars around like this, there was a mk3 Cortina estate on eBay recently clearly a 1976 model with a 1972 log book! I would not pay more than a few hundred for these type of cars as I would be expecting a pull from plod as it is really obvious they are ringers.

9,047 · December 17, 2022

Funnily enough - this on my FB Shite Search this morning : 1966 Ser 2a Land Rover

Land rover series 2a , 3500 v8 engine On a classic range rover chassis, On coil overs and disk breaks Mot and tax exempt, It comes with a modified certificate from dvla and v5 - Yeah, sure - it's missing original engine, transmission, axles, chassis, blah blah - how it got past the points system beats me

9,047 · December 17, 2022

1 hour ago, Shite Ron said:

It was probably given the fake ID some time between 2007 and 2012 before rolling tax exemption was resumed. I cannot understand doing it on something so obviously wrong but there are many cars around like this, there was a mk3 Cortina estate on eBay recently clearly a 1976 model with a 1972 log book! I would not pay more than a few hundred for these type of cars as I would be expecting a pull from plod as it is really obvious they are ringers.

Would today's junior plod know anything other than 'aww, look, a nice * old car' - PNC check would show nothing untoward either so it'd likely not get a pull

62,113 · December 17, 2022

19 hours ago, egg said:

99 year old waiting for the Telegram from the King.

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/432461825624857/

That must have looked ancient even in 1923.

62,728 · December 17, 2022

8 minutes ago, wuvvum said:

That must have looked ancient even in 1923.

Yep, Austin 7 would have seemed a great leap forward in comparison!

23,870 · December 17, 2022

8 minutes ago, wuvvum said:

That must have looked ancient even in 1923.

It wouldn't have looked like that back then:

Quote

Looking somewhat older courtesy of its brass radiator, windscreen surround and lighting set, this particular example is understood to date from the final few years of Model T production.