New POD Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 I had 2 C reg mk2 Cavaliers with the 1.8e 8v same as in the mk1 Astra gte. And a 1.8l mk3 cavalier with a carb and 20 bhp less in a heavier car. All were great. Not complex. Easy to fix and reliable. What went wrong Vauxhall? Stevebrookman and chodweaver 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandamonium Posted October 25, 2018 Author Share Posted October 25, 2018 Astra H and automatic? That bullet proof bit isn't going to last long, I'm afraid.Ha ha ha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geep Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 This is quite a touching thread, because Amy's 1.8 zafira Is shit on fuelStinks of oil when hotRattles its tits off when coldUnder the rocker cover is a load of crusty smeggy oil crustThe oil filter was caving in on itself when I gave it a service Yet it plods on quite happily! And has done for a long time, and hopefully will do for a long time yet! Reminds me, it's due an oil change soon... Had the oil smell on sons 1,8 vectra. New cam cover gasket and put a dab of sealant on the bottom corner of the slope at cam pulley end and replaced oil cooler seals. The oil cooler is a bit of a faff having to remove exhaust manifold to do and watch the coolant pipe O rings but check the cam cover gasket first. £15 at local motor factors for an FAI one cured the leak down the back of engine. (It leaked on to exhaust by lambda sensor and burnt oil patch was visible) On the subject of 1.8's, Italy also had some odd sized engines in various vehicles due to taxation, not sure if still the same. I quite like a 1.8, sons 58 vectra runs quite well. A bit of extra grunt when loaded or with passengers is useful, I'm a bit of a fan. I run a 2,0 Scenic (02) so like a bit of torque rather than small high revving engines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiC Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Astra H and automatic? That bullet proof bit isn't going to last long, I'm afraid.At least it's not the awful automated manual Easytronic. A Vauxhall slush auto has a bit more of a chance of surviving to 100k (just). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltox Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Astra H and automatic? That bullet proof bit isn't going to last long, I'm afraid.All Vauxhalls etc I think you’re wide of the mark on this one though, chief - that engine is the pick of the range and at least it’s a proper auto and not easychronic! SiC and Stevebrookman 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beko1987 Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Had the oil smell on sons 1,8 vectra. New cam cover gasket and put a dab of sealant on the bottom corner of the slope at cam pulley end and replaced oil cooler seals. The oil cooler is a bit of a faff having to remove exhaust manifold to do and watch the coolant pipe O rings but check the cam cover gasket first. £15 at local motor factors for an FAI one cured the leak down the back of engine. (It leaked on to exhaust by lambda sensor and burnt oil patch was visible) On the subject of 1.8's, Italy also had some odd sized engines in various vehicles due to taxation, not sure if still the same. I quite like a 1.8, sons 58 vectra runs quite well. A bit of extra grunt when loaded or with passengers is useful, I'm a bit of a fan. I run a 2,0 Scenic (02) so like a bit of torque rather than small high revving engines.I've don't the cam cover gasket, that's bone dry. I do have the oil cooler gaskets and a how to printed for one day, want to time it with a service though as I'll need to drop the oil and coolant, and it's too cold for that at the moment! Amys used to not sitting with it idling now, so temporarily fixed Geep 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mk2_craig Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 I've just remembered most of the MGF and TF production run was 1.8 litre. Broadsword 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bren Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Ford fitted the granada with the 1.8 for a mercifully short time. It would'nt pull your foreskin back. Stevebrookman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bolognasal spray Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 I've been running my 1.8 pezzer Fuckus for 14 years now. I suppose technically speaking there are now billions of cars more economical than it, but as I've forgotten what it's like to own anything else, I don't notice how bad on fuel it is. For the best part of a decade now I've been trying to drive as smoothly as possible, use the brakes as little as I can get away with, and change up at about 2.5k rpm. So quite short shifty, really. Third gear in the 30 limits, and keeping it legal. It seems to like this kind of treatment and doesn't appear overly thirsty. I prefer it to the 1.6, which the mrs had previously. It's just go that little bit more torque that means you can be quite laid back. Also, and although I've never driven one, I think I might prefer my Fuckus to these new eco boost lumps. Will have to try one though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bolognasal spray Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 What's the mx5 like with the 1.8 engine? I always imagine it must be quite nippy in such a small, light shell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltox Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 What's the mx5 like with the 1.8 engine? I always imagine it must be quite nippy in such a small, light shell.It is the engine to have according to Pistonheads I had a 1.6 and liked it mind. bolognasal spray and Bamboocarman 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adw1977 Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Ford fitted the granada with the 1.8 for a mercifully short time. It would'nt pull your foreskin back.About two years, from the launch of the Mark 3 until sometime in 1987. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loserone Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 323f GTi and baleno GSR both marvelous with 1.8s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormee Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Golf and Scirocco 1,8 90hp. Perfect for these little cars. The Reverend Bluejeans 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austin of England Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 I seem to remember it was in about 1985 the company car tax rules / bands altered, up to that point the bands were up to 1.3 litre, next 1.6 litre then 2.0 litre. Possibly in the new tax year from April the bands changed to 1.4 litre, 1.6 litre, not sure if the 2.0 litre stayed the same. The company I worked for had a fleet of Fords, Escorts & Sierras, entry level car was a 1.3L Escort, further up a 1.6L Sierra next 1.6GL Sierra or 1.6 Ghia Escort and the top management a 2.0 Ghia Sierra. As a daft young lad / gofer at the time I got to drive them all. I remember the 1.8 Sierras coming on fleet, the first was my favourite which I always tried to borrow if I could a 1.8 Ghia Estate, it wasn't quick but it looked good in a metallic blue / grey, pepperpot wheels and roof bars. I believe the first 1.8s were the Pinto engine and was changed to a CVH engine when the Sierra was facelifted for the 87 model year, I preferred the Pinto ones. The Escorts got the 1.4 CVH engine in about 86 I think - its a long time ago Datsuncog 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollywobbler Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Small capcity V6's are pointless - just as expensive to run as their bigger engined siblings put power outputs comprarable to their smaller engined bretheren. I don't necessarily agree. I can rag the crap out of my Rover and know I'm hardly likely to upset PC Plod. I like that. I want a V6 more for the the noise than the performance. Personally, I'd far rather have a 1.8 over a 1.6. Now they really are the worst of the worst. Barely enough power to move, yet clobbered for the same rate vehcile tax as a bleedin' Range Rover. Or a Dodge Viper. Sir Snipes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noel Tidybeard Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Economy of a 2 litre, performance of a 1.6. golly you just described the crocus 1.8 spurt that B&Q hired whilst i was there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rantingYoof Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 All Vauxhalls etc I think you’re wide of the mark on this one though, chief - that engine is the pick of the range and at least it’s a proper auto and not easychronic! My mum's car, while she could drive, was a '58 Astra 1.8 VVTi in Elite spec. 140hp in a car that small made it pretty damn nippy, particularly off the line, and it also had a weirdly distinctive (and enjoyful) engine note. The 4spd autobox was very basic and dimwitted...you had to treat it really roughly to get it to kick down or stay in gear, but it would rev happily and keep pulling willingly all the way. It also settled down to a pretty refined cruising engine speed too. It was dreadful on fuel. Like, 22-24mpg around town, although shorter journeys didn't help. I once had it for nearly a week while I was between cars. I actually put around half my mum's annual mileage on it in that time! On a long run I managed to get 42mpg from it. I think that 1.6 diesels are the modern-day version of the older 1.8 petrol, although clearly it'll be more about the performance compromise than the economy. I'm surprised at what a 1.6 TDi is being shoved into. In fact, if Nissan launched a bloody cruise ship I wouldn't be at all shocked to find out that its engineers had considered fitting it with the 1.5 DCi unit... Lacquer Peel and beko1987 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrcento Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 I don't necessarily agree. I can rag the crap out of my Rover and know I'm hardly likely to upset PC Plod. I like that. I want a V6 more for the the noise than the performance. Personally, I'd far rather have a 1.8 over a 1.6. Now they really are the worst of the worst. Barely enough power to move, yet clobbered for the same rate vehcile tax as a bleedin' Range Rover. Or a Dodge Viper. Agree with this entirely. I find in all ranges, the 1.6 is the unhappy middle ground, the worse of all worlds choice. (the only exceptions are arguably the Mk1 Focus, where the 1.6 feels like the 1.8 except slightly less thirsty, and the B16 Vtecs, a great engine in their own right, albeit still the 1.8 Vtec flavour is better). A boggo 1.6 never has enough power to justify the extra thirst over a 1.2 or 1.4, nor does it usually save enough fuel to justify ignoring a 1.8 or 2.0, yet you still pay top tax on the old system. Using Fiat as an example, they has a 1.6 that was used from early 90's to around 2004, it was terrible. Fiat had the 1.2 8v MPI 75BHP engine which in the real world, felt arguably faster than the 1.6 due to its torquier nature and also did an extra 15mpg. It also had a 1.8, which was no thirstier. In fact, the 2.0 20v 5cyl engines in non turbo variety were actually giving about the same MPG as the 1.6 in the real world! They ended up binning the 1.6 and replacing with the 1.2 16v SuperFIRE and later added the 1.4 16v. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broadsword Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 MGF 1.8 is an utter delight, just right for the car. mk2_craig 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rantingYoof Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 in the E46 3 Series, the three 6-pot petrols (320i, 325i, 330i) all have basically the same fuel economy figures. So why would you buy either of the two smaller ones?Because you had to rag it all the time to get any decent forward movement, the naturally aspirated 2.4 20v lump in my V70 (140hp) got around the same mpgs as the same car with the 2.4 T5 lump (260hp) which could be driven relatively normally and was not worked as hard. I guess the outright purchase price between these models at the time may have made some difference? Lacquer Peel 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chodweaver Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Being desperately out of touch with modern trends, I wouldn't touch a car with a 3 or 2 cylinder engine. Similarly, something available with 1.6, 1.8 and 2 litre engines suggests to me that the 1.6 is going to be an apology of a power unit, the 2 litre is for those who can disregard the added cost for the kudos of having the 2.0 badge and hang the thirst, or are just straight out nutters that have little desire to keep their licence, and the 1.8 gives the best compromise between power and economy. But then I formed my motoring opinions when a Cavalier was a desirable motor and before 1.4 litre 'tax efficient' engines were a thing. And when you could still get Lemon Puff biscuits. 'Ecoboost', I hear you say. Complete with a DMF, to make up for the chronic lack of balance in a three cylinder engine? FTS. Bamboocarman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floatylight Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Ford fitted the granada with the 1.8 for a mercifully short time. It would'nt pull your foreskin back.My Mum has one of them to replace a Belmont with the 1.8i engine out of the Astra GTE, the Granny was comfy but woefully slow, especially compared to Dad's Granny 2.8i manual injection special.. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghosty Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Are any VAG 1.8Ts left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghosty Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 also, 2 cylinder is great. They sound like a pair of bongos caning it down the street. Datsuncog and Sir Snipes 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hooli Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 I seem to remember it was in about 1985 the company car tax rules / bands altered, up to that point the bands were up to 1.3 litre, next 1.6 litre then 2.0 litre. Possibly in the new tax year from April the bands changed to 1.4 litre, 1.6 litre, not sure if the 2.0 litre stayed the same. The company I worked for had a fleet of Fords, Escorts & Sierras, entry level car was a 1.3L Escort, further up a 1.6L Sierra next 1.6GL Sierra or 1.6 Ghia Escort and the top management a 2.0 Ghia Sierra. As a daft young lad / gofer at the time I got to drive them all. I remember the 1.8 Sierras coming on fleet, the first was my favourite which I always tried to borrow if I could a 1.8 Ghia Estate, it wasn't quick but it looked good in a metallic blue / grey, pepperpot wheels and roof bars. I believe the first 1.8s were the Pinto engine and was changed to a CVH engine when the Sierra was facelifted for the 87 model year, I preferred the Pinto ones. The Escorts got the 1.4 CVH engine in about 86 I think - its a long time ago1.4LX was the fleet favourite mk4 escrote from memory. They all seemed to be in that crap blue as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bub2006 Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 Ford fitted the granada with the 1.8 for a mercifully short time. It would'nt pull your foreskin back.Dad had a red D plated one. Base trim. No electrics at all. Don't think it even had Central locking or Pas. Wrote it off when it went sideways on black ice and hit a slow moving BMW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket88 Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 VAG 1.8 turbo pez................bloody sight better than than 2 litre that followed it......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollywobbler Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 Being desperately out of touch with modern trends, I wouldn't touch a car with a 3 or 2 cylinder engine. Similarly, something available with 1.6, 1.8 and 2 litre engines suggests to me that the 1.6 is going to be an apology of a power unit, the 2 litre is for those who can disregard the added cost for the kudos of having the 2.0 badge and hang the thirst, or are just straight out nutters that have little desire to keep their licence, and the 1.8 gives the best compromise between power and economy. But then I formed my motoring opinions when a Cavalier was a desirable motor and before 1.4 litre 'tax efficient' engines were a thing. And when you could still get Lemon Puff biscuits. 'Ecoboost', I hear you say. Complete with a DMF, to make up for the chronic lack of balance in a three cylinder engine? FTS. Three-cylinder engines are great, though my preference is clearly for engines built before DMFs were things. The Japanese have been building them since the 1980s with no horrible balance issues. Lacquer Peel and Bamboocarman 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaseracer Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 My Dad once had a 1.8 Carlton that was pretty unkillable until I wrapped it around a lamppost. Sorry Dad. The Owd Giffer went the other way and had a 2.6 with a Getrag manual. It was a lovely old thing. Killed by idiot welder (yep, rear inner arches...) who fried the whole electrical system. cort1977 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now