Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.

Ross_K

By Ross_K
in AutoShite

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mrcento Rank: Renault 16

Mrcento

Posted
Posted

45455319_1764760343650472_40556787765608

 

Why is Chris Tarrant watching on?

 

I'm guessing in case anyone comes to buy it so he can ask if that's their final answer or suggest they phone a friend?

garethj Rank: Isuzu Florian

garethj

Posted
Posted

What are they actually like to drive?

 

https://www.leboncoin.fr/voitures/1518925939.htm/

 

3110ff027db38679d807f5a3d842761d8ec2011e

 

From what I've heard, driving a Panhard 24 isn't a problem you're likely to have as they mostly don't go.  As you probably know they were made in 4 types, B, BT, C and CT.  B is berlinetta or little saloon, C is coupe which has a shorter wheelbase and I think looks prettier.  T is Tigre which means 60bhp, otherwise it's 50bhp from the 850cc boxer twin engine.

 

I have loved, no, lusted after one of these for decades.  When a friend organised the Brooklands "Aircooled" event back in 2001 I was there in my Tatra and I got talking to a man who owned a RHD 24CT, I think it was a 1964 version with the drum brakes that showed through the wheel centres.  I asked him what the best thing was about driving it and he said the pleasant surprise of actually getting to his destination.

 

I don't give a fuck, I'd still have one.  But as it's only in my fantasy garage it would be a CT with drum brakes please :)

cros Rank: Renault 16

cros

Posted
Posted

That would involve having to enter it, no?

So no.

Flagrant Shirism. Requires a good stiff point.

panhard65 Rank: Renault 16

panhard65

Posted
Posted

From what I've heard, driving a Panhard 24 isn't a problem you're likely to have as they mostly don't go.  As you probably know they were made in 4 types, B, BT, C and CT.  B is berlinetta or little saloon, C is coupe which has a shorter wheelbase and I think looks prettier.  T is Tigre which means 60bhp, otherwise it's 50bhp from the 850cc boxer twin engine.

 

I have loved, no, lusted after one of these for decades.  When a friend organised the Brooklands "Aircooled" event back in 2001 I was there in my Tatra and I got talking to a man who owned a RHD 24CT, I think it was a 1964 version with the drum brakes that showed through the wheel centres.  I asked him what the best thing was about driving it and he said the pleasant surprise of actually getting to his destination.

 

I don't give a fuck, I'd still have one.  But as it's only in my fantasy garage it would be a CT with drum brakes please :)

Mine was pretty good to be honest and always started and never let me down. They are a bit scary mind as they will fly along and with the front wings mounted on rubber cotton reels it feels like the whole thing will fly apart. Mine was registered as a BT and had all the right bits for a BT but had the drum brakes which look much nicer. It didn't have a standard engine though as the heads had 2 spark plugs each but it had lost the dual ignition system at some point so was only using one plug per cylinder.

  • Skizzer, egg and garethj
  • Like 3
Supernaut Rank: Talbot Tagora

Supernaut

Posted
Posted

I'm posting this again just because I can't work out my excuse for why I haven't collected it yet. Apart from driving a 1300 crossflow across most of France would make an epic collection thread.

FTFY. When you collecting it?

Jim Bell Rank: Matra Rancho towing a Tagora

Jim Bell

Posted
Posted

Actually considered that for a moment, as the tax isn't that bad, but 24 - 34 mpg at today's diesel prices... No thanks,

Good! One less person for me to bid against.

barrett Rank: Lancia Gamma

barrett

Posted
Posted

Panhard 24s are great to look at and great to drive, although the C has such a short wheelbase the handling can be a bit odd. You sit very low, with a huge glasshouse, and they are occasionally a little unnerving. A lhd 24CT with drums is definitely the one to go for. The brakes aren't bad enough to make me think discs were necessary, and the drum wheels really do look the business. The rhd cars were so compromised, as I discovered the hard way, they're really not worth bothering with (lucky there are only about five left).

 

I can't imagine what sick train of thought led somebody to try and convert a Panhard engine to four plug/dual ignition, though. Is there any possible advantage to that? You can easily fit a wasted spark ignition which surely does the same job with about 1/1000th of the complexity. And you really don't wanna go making a Panhard more complex.

 

I think it's a bit of a joke that they don't work very often (says the man with two dismantled Panhards in the shed) but actually the engines are great, and as long as it hasn't been too fucked about with or driven by an unsympathetic owner there is no reason why they shouldn't just go on forever with minimal maintenance. The trouble is lots of people think they can 'improve' things and just make them worse. A good Panhard on song is hard to beat under any circumstances and they ought to be left well enough alone.

Lacquer Peel Rank: Talbot Tagora

Lacquer Peel

Posted
Posted

Actually considered that for a moment, as the tax isn't that bad, but 24 - 34 mpg at today's diesel prices... No thanks,

Eminently veg friendly.
egg Rank: Matra Rancho towing a Tagora

egg

Posted
Posted

Well owning a Panhard 24CT is certainly a before I die/petrol 'runs out'* aspiration. I'm not going to say also a great leccy conversion potential, for fear of being shot.

oldcars Rank: Lancia Gamma

oldcars

Posted
Posted

That Tata is class. Thye are normally rotten, that one only* has advisorys for inner sills. That would be brilliant for towing my caravan. Rock up with this and the old Marauder at a caravan club site. No one would come near me.

  • davehedgehog31 and BorniteIdentity
  • Like 2
Supernaut Rank: Talbot Tagora

Supernaut

Posted
Posted

Ha. I've just read some reviews of the Tata Safari and it working on veg would be the first plus point I've come across. They must be awful.

 

https://www.totaloffroad.co.uk/vehicles/tata/dont-do-it/

The Safari is a solid foundation for, well, nothing. It’s just a horrible, horrible thing, and under no circumstances should you ever buy one. It fails to deliver on any of its promises, implicit or explicit. And in EX form, it simply confirms that age-old adage: you can’t polish a turd. Especially not when what you’re trying to polish it with is another turd.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

 

When are you collecting it?

  • jumpingjehovahs, somewhatfoolish, Timewaster and 1 other
  • Like 4
Lacquer Peel Rank: Talbot Tagora

Lacquer Peel

Posted
Posted

I'm sure by £15k new car standards they were quite shit but I'd try one out for shiter money.

  • Jim Bell and 95 quid Peugeot
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...