Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, Cavcraft said:

Picture 1 of 24

MORRIS MINI CLUBMAN | eBay

Anyone who buys that and fucks about with shit wheels, head light trims and stickers should be kneecapped with the roof rack.

A kneecapping would not be enough!

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Cavcraft said:

I guess he either hasn't had a V5 for it or there's something slightly wrong there. It was taxed until May 1993 so presumably being used as of May 1992 at the earliest

Last V5 issued September 1991

Posted
1 minute ago, egg said:

Have we ever had a Wind on here?

All the time, when I've been drinking cider

Posted
1 hour ago, horriblemercedes said:

I guess he either hasn't had a V5 for it or there's something slightly wrong there. It was taxed until May 1993 so presumably being used as of May 1992 at the earliest

Last V5 issued September 1991

He's saying he's had since 1988 (if my maths are any good) so he possibly does have the log book somewhere. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Cavcraft said:

He's saying he's had since 1988 (if my maths are any good) so he possibly does have the log book somewhere. 

Yeah, but he also says he bought it as a non-runner with no MOT and presumably it was running and with MOT until 1992-1993 if someone was still taxing it 

Posted

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/115846639002

Skoda Superior Estate 1.8 TSI SE 5dr Automatic - REPAIR OR SPARES

s-l960.thumb.webp.43e91ef369686d8b4a5f8fd910fc978a.webp

Shit load spent on that engine but...

The clutch and magnatronic unit have failed, so it has to be towed away. 

  • Like 3
Posted
48 minutes ago, egg said:

TWO genuine Citrines - both f*****

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/354889537975

 

 

Someone the other side of town had two in his garden, one was in use most days but both seem to have gone now.

Posted
55 minutes ago, MantaGTE85 said:

We didn't get these in K reg, did we?

No, they were available in 1994 only I think - so L and M reg. Some are in great condition (like below), a few projects, and some like these never coming back. I'm sure someone must have a register. I try not to follow them too closely, as I don't want to get sucked into to trying to get one 😆

279734954_10228696802704374_190391084313

 

Posted

Some real gems around at the moment, if you're handy with a spanner.Wish I wasn't such an inept mechanic so I could afford to buy something good.

Want an American muscle car coupe? Step this way!

355120462_10225912965762451_330586496823

This might be the coolest thing I've ever seen, actually

355271654_10225912964042408_547925442510

3.6-litre V6. Off the road for 20 years but looks pretty good to me. £2750 which sounds like a mega barg

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/1390853538151784/

I've been seriously looking at MGBs recently (I'm approaching middle-age, sue me) and this looks like a belter tbh

347565590_2041320859562446_1203122876301

347385133_2041333339561198_3076877702858

It's all sorts of brown, but it's also in the arse-end of Wales. Off the road for 20 years again, but does look fundamentally sound, honest and appealing. £2750 again, which doesn't get you much in the MG world these days

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/1509117983225504/

Mega rare Opel Astra with the 1.2 powerhouse

357739732_10209879810989540_896560652508

Meets my minimum brown content requirements with ease

357528295_10209879801309298_369231046569

Failed its MoT on some welding (doesn't sound too serious looking at the test) but it's from 1983 so SOD MOT and be dammed. Inexplicably only £1250 which seems aight for a genuine slice of extinct street furniture

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/1506663796798120/

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, barrett said:

Mega rare Opel Astra with the 1.2 powerhouse

357739732_10209879810989540_896560652508

Meets my minimum brown content requirements with ease

357528295_10209879801309298_369231046569

Failed its MoT on some welding (doesn't sound too serious looking at the test) but it's from 1983 so SOD MOT and be dammed. Inexplicably only £1250 which seems aight for a genuine slice of extinct street furniture

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/1506663796798120/

 

As far as I can see in this pictures it seems quite rotten or previously repaired in the usual places unfortunately (under the headlamps/indicators, the wings, sills, rear arches). This one is especially worrying, my own 1.2 failed on rot there and after a bit of poking most of the footwell turned out to be toast:

Quote

Nearside Front Lower Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength suspension arm (5.3.6 (a) (i))

Also, this may put me at risk of sounding like an ignorant foreigner, but were rear seat belts already mandatory in Britain in 1983? 

Quote
  • Nearside Rear Seat belt missing (7.1.2 (a))
  • Offside Rear Seat belt missing (7.1.2 (a))

It doesn't look like it had seat belts originally:

357721127_10209879801189295_555556077440

 

  • Like 3
Posted
26 minutes ago, D.E said:
26 minutes ago, D.E said:

Also, this may put me at risk of sounding like an ignorant foreigner, but were rear seat belts already mandatory in Britain in 1983?

No they weren’t.  I had to specify them as an extra on my new  (company car) Cavalier in 1984. When it was replaced in 1986 rear belts were mandatory on new vehicles, so I didn’t have to ask for them to be fitted.

Wearing  rear belts was not mandatory until 1991.

Posted

 

29 minutes ago, D.E said:

As far as I can see in this pictures it seems quite rotten or previously repaired in the usual places unfortunately (under the headlamps/indicators, the wings, sills, rear arches). This one is especially worrying, my own 1.2 failed on rot there and after a bit of poking most of the footwell turned out to be toast:

Also, this may put me at risk of sounding like an ignorant foreigner, but were rear seat belts already mandatory in Britain in 1983? 

It doesn't look like it had seat belts originally:

357721127_10209879801189295_555556077440

 

you’re right. They didn’t become mandatory until 1991

EDIT: seat belt wearing.

The above post is correct. 1986 for actually having them.

I wonder if that was the reason for the retest 4 days later as it’s the only thing that’s different.

Also tester is a clown. It’s obvious the car has been round the clock.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...