Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Sir Snipes said:

 I do wonder if the 1.8T suits a Rover though. No doubt better than the NA, and probably better numbers than the 2.0, but maybe the 2.0 "feels" more Rover?

Personally I thought the 1.8T suited the 75 surprisingly well.  The 2.0 V6 sounds nicer, but you have to rev the knackers off it to get it to move, which is very uncouth.  The Turbokettle is a lot torquier.

Edit:  The obvious answer is to go for the 2.5 V6 - all the advantages of the 2.0 (and similar fuel consumption) but avoids the underpowered feel.

Posted

gallery

FORD-CORTINA-2-0-GHIA-AUTO
 
 
Phwaaar!  Just right, brown Chatsworth interior, mismatched door, very solid and original, not too perfect, I would just sort the minor rust issues and use as is, looks good with the brake dust on the front wheels, like it’s been up and down the motorway all day    ,like they used to ?
Posted
23 minutes ago, Shite Ron said:

gallery

FORD-CORTINA-2-0-GHIA-AUTO
 
 
Phwaaar!  Just right, brown Chatsworth interior, mismatched door, very solid and original, not too perfect, I would just sort the minor rust issues and use as is, looks good with the brake dust on the front wheels, like it’s been up and down the motorway all day    ,like they used to ?

That's lovely but I'd be worried what's under the wob surrounding the windscreen!

Posted
15 minutes ago, Tenmil Socket said:

That's lovely but I'd be worried what's under the wob surrounding the windscreen!

I can answer that: it’ll be rust.

?

Just like George at Soup Classic Motoring found in his Cortina 80: 

https://youtu.be/5kj_LOVZE7Y

Posted
1 hour ago, wuvvum said:

Personally I thought the 1.8T suited the 75 surprisingly well.  The 2.0 V6 sounds nicer, but you have to rev the knackers off it to get it to move, which is very uncouth.  The Turbokettle is a lot torquier.

Edit:  The obvious answer is to go for the 2.5 V6 - all the advantages of the 2.0 (and similar fuel consumption) but avoids the underpowered feel.

I assumed the Turbo was the "busier" of the two!

Posted
1 hour ago, Hertz said:

I bet there are not many of these kicking around.

spacer.png

https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1224359

Yea, my neighbor had one. It's the only one I'd ever seen, I'd assumed it was a jap import. 

I'd suspect like most Suzuki's of that age you'd want to be careful about rot. 

 

 

Posted

No, that was the Xedos 9.  I wouldn't mind trying a Xedos 6, but can't take on any more non-MOT'd cars at the moment.

Posted
19 hours ago, cort16 said:

I kind of forgot the porsche 968 even exists.. Was it any more than a warmed up 944? It  was built in the dark days of Porsche when they nearly went tits up in the early 1990s so I imagine

the 968 was an attempt to knock out a new model on the cheap.

They're not cheap anyway, this one is an auto with 195,000 miles on it and is the best part of 8 grand

 

4747fe11a1254a4f9a3d150c35cc8c2e.jpg

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/202002107140436

The best car I ever owned by a mile (mine was manual, I hasten to add). The most reliable car I’ve ever owned and the most fun to drive, too, and I tripled my money when I sold it. 

Posted
1 hour ago, spike60 said:

That doesn’t look like a real GT from the dashboard. Hillman GT’s had a strip speedo and pod revcounter like a Mk 1 Escort Sport. When it  became the Hillman Hunter GT, I thought it got the same dash as the GLS, ie deep set speedo and tacho, with4 gauges in the centre .  This seems to be a DL or GL.

Wheres @PaykanHunter when you need him?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...