Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is a V10 engine weird?  Probably not, but the following is a great story:

https://www.mobilityengineeringtech.com/component/content/article/44453-sae-ma-03773

It concerns events circa 2001-2, which culminated in the manufacture of a one-off, high-performance Ford V10 and its fitment in a condemned-to-be-crushed, engineless Mustang Cobra.  Said car still exists and runs, apparently.  

SAE-MA-03773-mustang-v-10_block-casting.jpg

SAE-MA-03773-mustang-v-10_custom-intake.jpg

It's possible to see the oddly dual nature of something that was, effectively, home-made on a shoestring by experts with vast resources at their disposal (Ford's Romeo engine plant and advanced casting facilities out of Windsor, Ontario).  

The Boss 351 itself, the V10 Mustang, looks perfectly normal:

SAE-MA-03773-mustang-v-10_team-at-milan.jpg

What might have been, eh?  It was supposed to have been a production car.  A variant of the same engine could also have powered the Ford GT. 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Zelandeth said:

Big brother of that is the Leyland L60.  

Which while problematic in the field, still sounds bloody awesome.

Or bolt three of the buggers together in a triangle, scale it up a bunch and you have the Deltic.

Apparently the Chieftan was a very well regarded tank, assuming it happened to conk out in a tactically useful position...

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Zelandeth said:

Big brother of that is the Leyland L60.  

Which while problematic in the field, still sounds bloody awesome.

Or bolt three of the buggers together in a triangle, scale it up a bunch and you have the Deltic.

Or cut one in half, miniaturise it and you have the CoventryClimax H30. Also found in the Chieftain.

IMG_0327.jpeg.d8700ec7ddc3525c7640c703c2bfadad.jpeg

https://eics-products.co.uk/shop/military-vehicle-spare-parts/6115998056847-h30-apu-gen-set-for-chieftain-tank-fv600408/

Posted

The combined petrol/diesel engine in this International TD6 crawler from 1942. This example and the wider explanation are on show at the fantastic North Ings Farm Museum in Lincolnshire:
https://northingsfarmmuseum.co.uk/

26-Apr-25-InternationalTD6withduelfuelengine-vehicle.jpg.d74b780ccdfd926434c3972d5c7334b7.jpg

 

26-Apr-25-InternationalTD6withduelfuelengine-explanation.jpg.8f2124e5ebef8a24ba977b200171d477.jpg

Posted

Gobron_engine_(Autocar_Handbook_Ninth_edition).jpg.209cc55e5e696422a636d3a843ad2229.jpg

The Gobron opposed piston engine with overhead yoke, used in Gobron-Brillié cars until 1925.

Posted
17 minutes ago, artdjones said:

Gobron_engine_(Autocar_Handbook_Ninth_edition).jpg.209cc55e5e696422a636d3a843ad2229.jpg

The Gobron opposed piston engine with overhead yoke, used in Gobron-Brillié cars until 1925.

Some British Motorbikes had 2 cylinder engines like this, with both cylinders firing at the same time.

Posted

Has there ever been a W9 engine, with 3 banks of 3 cylinders?

I remember puzzling over the possibility of one in my teenage years.

Posted

Well this has opened up an evening of reading about all sorts of weird engines - this one is wild:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tZmd7k33JWE

about 3:40 in its running - the Adam’s Farwell rotary engine, where the crank stays where it is, but the pistons go flying round instead. Genuinely terrifying! 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Mrs6C said:

The combined petrol/diesel engine in this International TD6 crawler from 1942. This example and the wider explanation are on show at the fantastic North Ings Farm Museum in Lincolnshire:
https://northingsfarmmuseum.co.uk/

26-Apr-25-InternationalTD6withduelfuelengine-vehicle.jpg.d74b780ccdfd926434c3972d5c7334b7.jpg

 

26-Apr-25-InternationalTD6withduelfuelengine-explanation.jpg.8f2124e5ebef8a24ba977b200171d477.jpg

I was looking at the one the king of obsolete has and thinking just how odd that arrangement was.

Posted
3 hours ago, Missy Charm said:

Is a V10 engine weird?  Probably not, but the following is a great story:

https://www.mobilityengineeringtech.com/component/content/article/44453-sae-ma-03773

It concerns events circa 2001-2, which culminated in the manufacture of a one-off, high-performance Ford V10 and its fitment in a condemned-to-be-crushed, engineless Mustang Cobra.  Said car still exists and runs, apparently.  

SAE-MA-03773-mustang-v-10_block-casting.jpg

SAE-MA-03773-mustang-v-10_custom-intake.jpg

It's possible to see the oddly dual nature of something that was, effectively, home-made on a shoestring by experts with vast resources at their disposal (Ford's Romeo engine plant and advanced casting facilities out of Windsor, Ontario).  

The Boss 351 itself, the V10 Mustang, looks perfectly normal:

SAE-MA-03773-mustang-v-10_team-at-milan.jpg

What might have been, eh?  It was supposed to have been a production car.  A variant of the same engine could also have powered the Ford GT. 

Love reading about this sorta stuff, there's always hope while people like this work in big companies.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

How about the Detroit diesels big 2 stroke with a blower? 

Nothing else sounds like one of those, even the little ones that we sometimes got in plant over here sound good.

  • Agree 2
Posted

Has the BRM H-16 been mentioned yet?

H16+prototype+engine.jpg
brm-h16-engine-article.jpg

 

Posted

Reading about all these incredibly complex engines, just makes it even more frustrating that I can’t get a poxy single cylinder strimmer to start.

Posted

Life Racing Engines' 1990 W12 "broad arrow" with three banks of four DOHC cylinders.

undefined

It powered (in a loose sense of the word) the Life L190, which is widely regarded to be probably the worst Formula One car ever.  It was so totally slow and unreliable that at some events Bruno Giacomelli would probably have done quicker laps on a bicycle!

 

  • Like 3
Posted
48 minutes ago, DodgeRover said:

How about the Detroit diesels big 2 stroke with a blower? 

Nothing else sounds like one of those, even the little ones that we sometimes got in plant over here sound good.

Two stroke diesels probably deserve their own category, the Detroit Diesel xV71 series certainly did make some epic noises, though they’re fairly conventional by the standards of some engines in this thread. I’m rather partial to the GM 645 series, which like many GM two stroke diesels have gear-driven turbochargers:

The idea is that at lower rpms the geartrain keeps the turbo spinning and once revs increase the clutch driving the turbo off the geartrain disengages and allows the turbo to become truly exhaust-driven like a conventional turbo.

Posted
2 hours ago, Richard_FM said:

Has there ever been a W9 engine, with 3 banks of 3 cylinders?

I remember puzzling over the possibility of one in my teenage years.

Nothing comes to mind or pops out of the interweb on W9s, but although I was aware of the Napier Lion broad arrow (=W) 12 cylinder aero engine with three banks of 4. I did not realise it first ran in 1917!

Posted

I've mentioned it before on other threads, but I reckon the Dawb 6 engine is worth showcasing again:

1446855208_Screenshot_20220811-0051182.png

You're looking at an air-cooled transverse inline 6 cylinder engine with a dry sump, displacing 1.4 litres and with three twin-choke Weber carbs fitted.

All completely designed from scratch by its creators, Davy Woods and Artie Bell.

20190615_161910 (2).jpg

The car and engine both survive as an exhibit at the Ulster Transport Museum just outside Belfast.

20190615_161922.jpg

Posted
9 hours ago, Datsuncog said:

I've mentioned it before on other threads, but I reckon the Dawb 6 engine is worth showcasing again:

1446855208_Screenshot_20220811-0051182.png

You're looking at an air-cooled transverse inline 6 cylinder engine with a dry sump, displacing 1.4 litres and with three twin-choke Weber carbs fitted.

Classic Cars Oct 1988

s-l1600 (1).jpg

s-l1600.webp.3ececc4c3cdfc05e45c558e1de8e6a64.webp

Posted
15 minutes ago, MiniMinorMk3 said:

Suzuki RE-5

Suzuki_RE5_005_Dom_TheBike-768x576.jpg

The 1975 Suzuki RE-5 was pipped at the Wankel production post, by the 1974 Hercules/DKW W2000

Hercules-W2000-1600x1135.webp.10e3e033f98379f7b333750d89613c8f.webp

Fichtel & Sachs had purchased the Hercules motorcycle marque in 1963, around the same time they had bought a license to build Wankel rotary engines with a view to using them in stationary motors and in vehicles like the 1969 Arctic Cat Panther 295 snowmobile

92388832_2954483527974777_8440270443616665600_n.jpg.7b445cd928c084b1686b6f19b032f3eb.jpg

Sales of the motorcycles were hurt due to insurance companies of the period's inexperience of Wankel engines, e.g. classing the Hercules as having a capacity of 882cc rather than 294cc. As a result of this, insurance costs in many countries was on par with the most powerful superbikes of the era, despite the far lower power output.

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, castros_bro said:

Valveless Pulsejet, no moving parts (not a ramjet)

 

is posting that on here wise sir

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...