Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Picture 1 of 4

motorcycles scooters | eBay

'never race..not done 1 lap'

Given that the front brake line seems to be some garden hose held on with a cable tie, it's probs just as well, M8.

Picture 3 of 4

Posted
21 hours ago, grogee said:

Curious Maestro mystery. Can any BL lickers tell me if digital dash was an option on 1.3L spec? I thought it was only MG/VDP that could have it.

Anyway, good donor for bits for mine, but may skyrocket in price due to digital dash 80s mania.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/334722859896?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=lNKbcVwyRI6&sssrc=2349624&ssuid=2Z40wC2iSsq&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY

Screenshot_20230129-193040-165.png

Screenshot_20230129-193053-613.png

 

17 hours ago, High Jetter said:

Am pretty sure it wasn't, at least 1.6HL or above.

The digital dash on the Maestro was standard fit on VP and MG  1600 versions. Optional extra on the 1.6HLS. It was an option for early EFi engined MGs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Maestro#Novel_features

Some way down on this page.

https://www.aronline.co.uk/cars/austin/maestro/lc10-development-story/

  • Like 3
Posted
34 minutes ago, Remspoor said:

 

The digital dash on the Maestro was standard fit on VP and MG  1600 versions. Optional extra on the 1.6HLS. It was an option for early EFi engined MGs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Maestro#Novel_features

Some way down on this page.

https://www.aronline.co.uk/cars/austin/maestro/lc10-development-story/

That's what I thought. Yet this is a 1.3L with digital dash. Which would be unremarkable except I'm struggling to work out how it was integrated onto a 1.3 A-series, if the only factory options were 1.6 or 2.0. The underbonnet shot doesn't seem to show any fudged wiring (admittedly hard to tell among the BL Spaghetti).

Is it a Bitsa car? Bitsa this, bitsa that?

Either way it's BIN at £750, a steal* for 80s digital CoMpUtErIzEd space age.

Not obvious from the eBay pics whether it's got the talking module, which sits to the left of the instruments - I thought digital = talking, but maybe not in this case.

Curiouser and curiouser.

s-l1600 (5).jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Wibble said:

Switchable gearbox makes this the rare 4 litre S rather than the common 3.2. Believe only 500 4 litre S models were made.

@Cluffy & I had a four-litre XJ40. It went like the clappers. Think we paid about the same for ours and it was surprisingly un-rusty 

 

Posted
Just now, grogee said:

@Cluffy & I had a four-litre XJ40. It went like the clappers. Think we paid about the same for ours and it was surprisingly un-rusty 

 

A special car, that. Soooo comfy... Ate miles and fuel for laughs. It’s a shame we’ve not yet acquired that barn yet, @grogee!

Posted
8 minutes ago, grogee said:

@Cluffy & I had a four-litre XJ40. It went like the clappers. Think we paid about the same for ours and it was surprisingly un-rusty 

 

I had one too. 1994 4 litre sovereign, loved it. Tried to buy it back years ago when I heard the current owner was scrapping it due to an electrical fault. I went straight round but was too late. He got £35, prick.

  • Sad 2
Posted
1 hour ago, grogee said:

That's what I thought. Yet this is a 1.3L with digital dash. Which would be unremarkable except I'm struggling to work out how it was integrated onto a 1.3 A-series, if the only factory options were 1.6 or 2.0. The underbonnet shot doesn't seem to show any fudged wiring (admittedly hard to tell among the BL Spaghetti).

Is it a Bitsa car? Bitsa this, bitsa that?

Either way it's BIN at £750, a steal* for 80s digital CoMpUtErIzEd space age.

Not obvious from the eBay pics whether it's got the talking module, which sits to the left of the instruments - I thought digital = talking, but maybe not in this case.

Curiouser and curiouser.

s-l1600 (5).jpg

If I recall, and I did have an early MG, there is metal to be some sort of metal "box" which gathered the information from the sensors. This was in the engine bay. My old Hanyes manual is in the  attic so I cannot confirm.

Posted
23 minutes ago, wesacosa said:

Est. Retail Value:£2,795.00 GBP.   

,🤣

Seems about right...

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.eb2ebaf2e9ec6b5cd0b127551ac971b1.jpg

Posted

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.3f0b3d3607af52c97bfec00c11700695.jpg

I'd love take this to the coast and park next to some chump who just splashed 70k, on a crappy 4D number plated V Dud Caravelle.

Posted
3 minutes ago, morrisoxide said:

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.3f0b3d3607af52c97bfec00c11700695.jpg

I'd love to go to the coast and park next to some chump who just splashed 70k, on a crappy 4D number plated V Dud transporter.

That is pure sex.

  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, grogee said:

That is pure isopon

FTFY :D

Posted
10 hours ago, goosey said:

Lowline ?

is that to do with the spec ? 

No roof shape the original pre 59 highline had a thicker more bulbous roof.

  • Like 3
Posted
3 hours ago, grogee said:

That's what I thought. Yet this is a 1.3L with digital dash. Which would be unremarkable except I'm struggling to work out how it was integrated onto a 1.3 A-series, if the only factory options were 1.6 or 2.0. The underbonnet shot doesn't seem to show any fudged wiring (admittedly hard to tell among the BL Spaghetti).

Is it a Bitsa car? Bitsa this, bitsa that?

Either way it's BIN at £750, a steal* for 80s digital CoMpUtErIzEd space age.

Not obvious from the eBay pics whether it's got the talking module, which sits to the left of the instruments - I thought digital = talking, but maybe not in this case.

Curiouser and curiouser.

s-l1600 (5).jpg

A-Plus, well done!!! What was the difference between the original A Series and the newer A+ Series? Does A+ make it some kind of lean-burn unit like some later CVH's were?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...