Cookiesouwest Posted March 19, 2024 Posted March 19, 2024 5 minutes ago, Bren said: I think the 2.3 motor is sought after for transplants into escorts etc. I think it only went in the galaxy and scorpio? Went in the mk4 mondeo too. Unless Ford developed a whole new 2.3 that no one wanted. lesapandre 1
Cookiesouwest Posted March 19, 2024 Posted March 19, 2024 Not bad MOT history too. Hope the coolant leak is not too worrying. Weird I'm more excited about an MPV than an MGF. Had both. I prefer the Galaxy. EyesWeldedShut, HMC, lesapandre and 1 other 4
Schaefft Posted March 19, 2024 Posted March 19, 2024 30 minutes ago, HMC said: The shad is going tomorrow, the p38 next thursday, but a mingebag OMG MPG chariot arrives tomorrow. £20 annual tax, any guesses? Audi A2 pls gadgetgricey and yes oui si 1 1
High Jetter Posted March 19, 2024 Posted March 19, 2024 1 hour ago, HMC said: The shad is going tomorrow, the p38 next thursday, but a mingebag OMG MPG chariot arrives tomorrow. £20 annual tax, any guesses? Your rotating garage door is making me dizzy!
EyesWeldedShut Posted March 20, 2024 Posted March 20, 2024 10 hours ago, HMC said: The shad is going tomorrow, the p38 next thursday, but a mingebag OMG MPG chariot arrives tomorrow. £20 annual tax, any guesses? 2008-2010 R56/R55 mini with DV6 engine and a rotting subframe (or two)
Supernaut Posted March 20, 2024 Posted March 20, 2024 10 hours ago, HMC said: The shad is going tomorrow, the p38 next thursday, but a mingebag OMG MPG chariot arrives tomorrow. £20 annual tax, any guesses? My guess is a citybug, 107/C1/Aygo. Carl1981 and HMC 2
loserone Posted March 20, 2024 Posted March 20, 2024 8 hours ago, High Jetter said: Your rotating garage door is making me dizzy! It's not so bad you know. E.g this year S class S124 Shad P38 Galaxy MGF It's one car every two weeks. Keep up at the back! yes oui si, High Jetter and tooSavvy 3
HMC Posted March 20, 2024 Author Posted March 20, 2024 19 hours ago, Schaefft said: Audi A2 pls There was one locally, for a decent price but decided against. Any excuse to buy a car, but lately ive been interested to scour the bargain bucket depths again. After covid things went a bit tits up for the casual banger buyer. Stuff got more expensive! I found it a bit depressing. Ive always been fascinated by how little money can provide a functioning motor car in no need work to be usable. Probably what lead me here back along. Lately ive found things changing, and for people prepared to dredge the internet, and sift through crap its possible to get road legal cars again, harbouring no terminal issues for not a lot. I nearly bought a 1998 volvo s40 for £250. 1.8 auto. Had a long ticket, and despite apparently a water leak into the rear footwells and some minor scuffs and scrapes it seemed legit. I decided against as ive never really lusted after mk1 v40s. Also having a van/ people carrier is quite handy with the ever changing friend profile resulting from collectively 5 kids between myself and ms_hmc. The need to haul bikes / other peoples kids/ have the interior trashed with dogs gave a specific set of requirements. Obviously its a bit rough, ready trashed, if you will; but it runs and drives just fine, and has an mot to jan 25. 2.3 manual- im suprised just how rapid it feels. Ideal to fill with booze over on a french trip. it was up at £895 (too much imo) but i sniffed a willing seller when it was parked on their grass and hemmed in by other vehicles. Apparently it was bought as a stop gap and no longer needed. Would sir accept £600? Yes, yes he would. Plus according the the vendor he was overwhelmed with messages from old skool ford people wanting him to have the engine but not the rest of the car? stuboy, egg, Marm Toastsmith and 8 others 11
Zelandeth Posted March 20, 2024 Posted March 20, 2024 Sad to see it go, but equally thank god I can stop worrying I'm going to end up letting my guard down and buying the Rolls now! egg 1
HMC Posted March 20, 2024 Author Posted March 20, 2024 16 minutes ago, Zelandeth said: Sad to see it go, but equally thank god I can stop worrying I'm going to end up letting my guard down and buying the Rolls now! Got to say i’m really glad @Weird Car bought it as having younger people prepared to get stuck in with old cars is fantastic. And this isnt, say, an allegro, its a rolls royce silver shad! Looking forward to fun road trip / general updates! For me this is what enjoying older cars is all about, id happily put a flamethrower to all carcoon / dehumidified air chambers. Driving is living imo. Sigmund Fraud, Carl1981, Popsicle and 8 others 3 8
Zelandeth Posted March 20, 2024 Posted March 20, 2024 7 minutes ago, HMC said: Got to say i’m really glad @Weird Car bought it as having younger people prepared to get stuck in with old cars is fantastic. And this isnt, say, an allegro, its a rolls royce silver shad! Looking forward to fun road trip / general updates! For me this is what enjoying older cars is all about, id happily put a flamethrower to all carcoon / dehumidified air chambers. Driving is living imo. Dammit...that means I'm still not safe from it! Agreed on everything you've said though. I see no point in having cars if you're not going to use, enjoy and share the experience with others. Flat4 and HMC 1 1
HMC Posted March 22, 2024 Author Posted March 22, 2024 Took the shed-MGF out for a spin. I think it might meed the attention of a hand pump I bought when I had my last mgf, and also used on 2 rover 100s i previously owned. Cos its LOW. I mean, it looks nice and low but the ride is pretty stiff. Maybe im just getting old? Photos show the dreadful paint. But it drives a lot better than it looks, thankfully! The “16v “ badge is none original (what isnit off?) but it feels period as when valveage was proudly displayed on the car bodywork feels a long time ago now. Unforgiving light- but basically all the laquer has come off the NSF wing, and it’s falling off the front bumper/shroud and the bonnet. Im enjoying pottering about in it. When I last had one ( a long time ago) I used to try and unstick it on b roads an generally behave like an imbecile. Eg I remember I attempted a 4 wheel drift but it ended up correcting and recorrecting snap oversteer. What an idiot. Somehow i didnt crash it. Anyway im happy just pottering now, and to be honest with its metro underpinnings maybe this suits the car better anyway. rainagain, Burnside, brownnova and 6 others 9
Zelandeth Posted March 22, 2024 Posted March 22, 2024 Badge is from a Citroen I think. That does look a little excessively low, especially at the back. HMC 1
J-T Posted March 22, 2024 Posted March 22, 2024 4 minutes ago, Zelandeth said: Badge is from a Citroen I think. That does look a little excessively low, especially at the back. Saxo VTS I believe. That and the SPORT badge from RenaultSport Clios made their way on to many vehicles in the early 00s HMC and 500tops 2
HMC Posted March 22, 2024 Author Posted March 22, 2024 Good intel. It looked familiar but i couldnt place it. I normally de-tat cars but i recon this is staying.
wuvvum Posted March 22, 2024 Posted March 22, 2024 Four-wheel-drifting a mid-engined car is not something I would feel confident doing. It ain't no MX-5. Sigmund Fraud 1
Zelandeth Posted March 22, 2024 Posted March 22, 2024 35 minutes ago, J-T said: Saxo VTS I believe. That and the SPORT badge from RenaultSport Clios made their way on to many vehicles in the early 00s That's it. Used to be on the rear quarter. My brain was refusing to remember exactly which model it appeared on.
HMC Posted March 29, 2024 Author Posted March 29, 2024 MGF progress After a pump up (i had a hand pump that i got off e bay years ago) it now sits at the spec ride height. So much more comfortable, presumably it was skittering about almost on its bump stops. I was a bit worried the shit ride quality was also blown displacers, but is now manages to be both sporty and a lot more supple. Broadsword, eddyramrod, Justwatching and 13 others 16
bezzabsa Posted March 29, 2024 Posted March 29, 2024 did rover ever chuck the 1800 Turbo lump in these??? if not why not???
riek Posted March 29, 2024 Posted March 29, 2024 9 minutes ago, bezzabsa said: did rover ever chuck the 1800 Turbo lump in these??? if not why not??? Produced similar power to the VVC but the VVC was more of a 'spank it' sports car choice? St.Jude 1
horriblemercedes Posted March 29, 2024 Posted March 29, 2024 Just now, riek said: Produced similar power to the VVC but the VVC was more of a 'spank it' sports car choice? This. Also why the 75/ZT got the 1.8 turbo but not the VVC It was a light pressure turbo that was designed to be fairly lazy and cheaper on company car costs than the 2.0 V6
N Dentressangle Posted March 29, 2024 Posted March 29, 2024 4 hours ago, HMC said: MGF progress After a pump up (i had a hand pump that i got off e bay years ago) it now sits at the spec ride height. So much more comfortable, presumably it was skittering about almost on its bump stops. I was a bit worried the shit ride quality was also blown displacers, but is now manages to be both sporty and a lot more supple. Can thoroughly recommend making sure hydragas cars run at their correct height. If as a boy you ever dreamed of having your very own hydragas pump, maybe as a stepping stone to your own BMC dealership even, you'll be pleased to know they're cheap and readily available: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/173119147833?itmmeta=01HT5RWTD7W06EXCP4C62JYT2G&hash=item284eb48f39:g:R3YAAOSwExZZc6h6 This is the very kind I have - fancier stuff is also on offer. Works a treat. auntiemaryscanary and High Jetter 2
HMC Posted March 29, 2024 Author Posted March 29, 2024 22 minutes ago, N Dentressangle said: Can thoroughly recommend making sure hydragas cars run at their correct height. If as a boy you ever dreamed of having your very own hydragas pump, maybe as a stepping stone to your own BMC dealership even, you'll be pleased to know they're cheap and readily available: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/173119147833?itmmeta=01HT5RWTD7W06EXCP4C62JYT2G&hash=item284eb48f39:g:R3YAAOSwExZZc6h6 This is the very kind I have - fancier stuff is also on offer. Works a treat. Same here, sorted 2x r100s and 2xmgfs with it so far.
St.Jude Posted March 29, 2024 Posted March 29, 2024 5 hours ago, horriblemercedes said: This. Also why the 75/ZT got the 1.8 turbo but not the VVC It was a light pressure turbo that was designed to be fairly lazy and cheaper on company car costs than the 2.0 V6 Think there was an emissions thing too with the turbo? Could be wrong on that though. Besides the VVC worked better at a higher rev band I think, as it was the VTEC equivalent. So you would do that in a 2 seat sports car and less so on a saloon. horriblemercedes 1
horriblemercedes Posted March 29, 2024 Posted March 29, 2024 3 minutes ago, St.Jude said: Think there was an emissions thing too with the turbo? Could be wrong on that though. Besides the VVC worked better at a higher rev band I think, as it was the VTEC equivalent. So you would do that in a 2 seat sports car and less so on a saloon. I think the emissions thing was to do with producing less CO2 than the V6 (better fuel economy) so it meant cheaper company car tax and more fleet sales St.Jude and tooSavvy 2
Boycie Posted March 31, 2024 Posted March 31, 2024 HMCs car history is like the life of John Profumo .... Minister of War ....Silver Shadow ...... get caught shagging Keeler and lying ......washing dishes and driving a tatty MG..... jim89, N Dentressangle, egg and 2 others 5
Jim Bergerac Posted March 31, 2024 Posted March 31, 2024 On 29/03/2024 at 19:54, horriblemercedes said: I think the emissions thing was to do with producing less CO2 than the V6 (better fuel economy) so it meant cheaper company car tax and more fleet sales Yep, around that time there was a bit of a trend towards such turbo petrols for that reason, as well as the 75/ZT can remember them coming up with 2.0 turbo versions of the Vectra and Laguna. And then the company car market moved to diesels and they disappeared almost as quickly as they appeared. 2flags, eddyramrod and horriblemercedes 1 1 1
EyesWeldedShut Posted March 31, 2024 Posted March 31, 2024 6 minutes ago, Jim Bergerac said: Yep, around that time there was a bit of a trend towards such turbo petrols for that reason, as well as the 75/ZT can remember them coming up with 2.0 turbo versions of the Vectra and Laguna. And then the company car market moved to diesels and they disappeared almost as quickly as they appeared. And now they're back? Plus ca change... I was wondering if getting the intercooler into the MGF was maybe thought too much hassle? I'd guess you could lose that little bit of boot space at the back if you really had to but that'd leave you with sod all space for 'stuff'? (Would it be feasible to site it all the down the front with the radiator? )
HMC Posted March 31, 2024 Author Posted March 31, 2024 Acquired one of these lately. Looks a bit “unhappy” to my eyes. Pininfarina design and build apparently. Presumably this one wont feature in future glossy portfolios of their work. Familiar focus vibes from the view out front. 2.0 duratec/ manual. Its a bit flat in a car this weighty (think its about 1500kg) but its quite a comfy cruiser to potter about in. Bear, Coprolalia, loserone and 13 others 16
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now