Jump to content

How Many Horses? - Free Beer


Recommended Posts

Posted

I predict a disappointing sub 200 initially then up to 242 with a fettle 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Saabnut said:

I will do a post on the history of the car later in the week. It was originally fitted with a brand new 357 but when Carroll Shelby drove it (I have a picture of him at the wheel) he insisted on a 427 and a 400 out of a 73 Chevelle was acquired and built to what it is.

That presumably puts the ford nerdists in a tizwaz over a GM product displacing FoMoCo.

Posted

It looks like it is all go for tomorrow :-) 

A few friends are running a sweepstake on it so I will go with the same number I have there. 365bhp

  • Like 2
Posted

I'm optimistic so will say a nice round 400bhp

 

I'll swap the pint for a run around the block in this ;)

Posted

First run completed, no figures yet (git!) but primary and secondary jet change underway

1580232879_jetchange.thumb.jpg.06b461995cfebdce2954f71bcfc29ab0.jpg

Posted

do we get to HEAR this??????

  • Like 4
Posted

I like seeing a car produce it's best on a dyno, there's an element of 'edge-of-the-seat' anticipation.

Surely with a half decent cam that should be able to make 350bhp.

 

Posted

I have a video on a run but a) cannot figure how to get it off my phone and b) it is very muted due to the exhaust collectors.

Anyway, the results are in. I am still awaiting confirmation of the weight but believed to be 1075kg. Very happy with the torque, a little disappointed with the power output.

plot.thumb.jpg.9163fea22303b2a886143bc8471f4beb.jpg

Posted

So I believe @Fumbler was closest (and I’m quietly smug about guessing within 2.5%).

I’m sure you can get that up into the 300s with a little bit of fettling though 😊

Also

1 hour ago, bezzabsa said:

do we get to HEAR this??????

this.

Posted

A pint to @Fumbler and to show I am not a poor loser one for @Skizzer as well!

Having thought about it, one of the priorities with this car is reliability as it will be making fairly regular trips between Aberdeen and Lemans (just under 2k miles round trip) and having a relatively unstressed engine should help with that. The torque should ensure a fun drive whilst retaining some semblance of control.

There are only 2 tyres still made for the rear, BFG All terrains :-) and Avon ZZR semi race tyres. The last set (9 years ago) cost £1200 trade, and they will need changing at the end of this year. They are superb tyres though.

Posted

Look at the torques, for a 1100kg car.   PMSL.  Happy times ahead.

Posted

260bhp per tonne is pretty respectable. 

More than a modern Golf R, a A45 AMG or even a Mustang GT V8. They'd have to be in the bigger engined Dodge Challenger to get close.

Posted
35 minutes ago, JeeExEll said:

Look at the torques, for a 1100kg car.   PMSL.  Happy times ahead.

This. Torque is much more fun than power and you’ve got literally truckloads of it.

What a fabulous device in every way 😁

1 hour ago, Saabnut said:

and to show I am not a poor loser one for @Skizzer as well!

Ha! Cheers! I’ll be glad to get a round in too when such things are allowed again.

Posted
2 hours ago, Saabnut said:

I have a video on a run but a) cannot figure how to get it off my phone and b) it is very muted due to the exhaust collectors.

Anyway, the results are in. I am still awaiting confirmation of the weight but believed to be 1075kg. Very happy with the torque, a little disappointed with the power output.

plot.thumb.jpg.9163fea22303b2a886143bc8471f4beb.jpg

I R disapoint. Still, as you say it should be docile and civilised to drive with curves like that; there's some constriction in there as it gives up at 3700 and starts twiddling its thumbs.

Posted

Just spoken to my friend who took it down. First he reminded me that it was wheel HP so add 20-30% ??? for transmission losses. The printout shows losses as 19HP but I am unsure of what these things mean. He said that to increase HP we would reduce Torque, especially at low revs. He said it drives superbly and would not change a thing! Coming home at 85mph it was sat at 1800 rpm and just lolloped along!

@hairnetthe tyres are super sticky, the last attempted 11 (on the Mulsanne straight) destroyed the clutch......

When lockdown ends I can go and fetch it.....

The printout:

numbers1.thumb.jpg.e8dfa4febec29b0eeac9f04e7debe68d.jpg

numbers2.thumb.jpg.41271d3f7e2c3e4db1ee720b254d318c.jpg

Posted

What size are the rear tyres? Just curious, having once run a car for which rear tyres were just no longer available (255/45 -15).

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Asimo said:

What size are the rear tyres? Just curious, having once run a car for which rear tyres were just no longer available (255/45 -15).

 

I cannot be sure but memory tells me 285/50-15 - the only reason they are still available is they were fitted to early 60s Corvettes, hence race tyres being the default.

Posted
1 hour ago, Saabnut said:

He said that to increase HP we would reduce Torque, especially at low revs.

You might already know this but:

BHP = Torque * RPM / 5252

A lot of low down torque that eases off with revs will give a max bhp that appears disappointing. Modern engines with turbos and fuel injection can give a flat torque curve, so give good bhp and still low down performance.

Low down torque is the head snapping umpfh and responsive feel that people likes.

Posted

Tow anything.................hmmmmm cobra with full on Transit and Dag lovers 'van on the back.....LOL

Posted

Looking at the first graph the house looks to have been already adjusted* to  flywheel figures?

Must admit to also having been disappointed with the figures produced, I would have been expecting somewhere around 400 flywheel figure?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...