HMC BIOHAZARD B5 passat

2,649 · January 31

Dad's mate had a landcrab when I was small.

I remember sitting in the back seat, and thinking the front seats were in the next county! 🥺

20,989 · January 31

PAS was an option on the 1800. The pump was stuck on the back of the dynamo meaning you couldn't convert it to an alternator which was quite a common conversion for any dynamo equipped cars back in the day (I have done my Triumph)

The six cylinder cars had a more conventional separate PAS pump run off the auxiliary belt. I'm not sure if the 1800 mk3 was available with it, as these were sold alongside the six cylinder cars but had alternators. Maybe as they were lower spec cars they just didn't offer it.

Best car I ever had (or at least the one I miss the most) was a Wolseley 18/85S auto with optional power steering. I fitted Rover SD1 alloys and Maxi HL (or Austin 1300 GT) steering wheel which was much smaller so gave better feel. It was properly chuckable. Being an S it had the MGB spec engine and the auto worked brilliantly because when you floored it the kickdown dropped it in to just the right rev range to pick up and go. It was faster than any manual Landcrab I had. And with the handbrake being under the dash you could use the centre armrests on the front seats to full effect. You could drive it with one hand and one foot leaving your left hand free to eat pies and the rover wheels meant it would go round any corners at any speed you wanted.

So I might be a little biased.

11,863 · January 31

My dad had 2 .An 1800S , TKP 338H and TKK 338N an 1800 run out model ..resprayed and oversills fitted at 3 years old .. with power steering . Far too light ..

9,668 · January 31

1 hour ago, Yoss said:

The six cylinder cars had a more conventional separate PAS pump run off the auxiliary belt. I'm not sure if the 1800 mk3 was available with it, as these were sold alongside the six cylinder cars but had alternators.

The 1800 Mk3 was available with an alternator or power steering as an optional extra, but not both together.

1972 brochure

12,509 · January 31

Didn't the 'Landcrab' tag come from when BMC took the 1800 Rallying and the car when viewed from above appeared to move sideways when cornering.

20,989 · January 31

17 minutes ago, Joey spud said:

Didn't the 'Landcrab' tag come from when BMC took the 1800 Rallying and the car when viewed from above appeared to move sideways when cornering.

Yes.

15,750 · January 31

6 hours ago, HMC said:

It seems to have a special smell-

{Hilda Ogden} Austin, Stanley - Austin /{Hilda Ogden}

21,243 · February 1

3,654 · February 1

can i throw my hat in the ring for when this comes up for sale?

10,995 · February 1

It was spotted!

21,243 · February 1

And what a very handsome vehicle it is.

BMC - why did you not retain Pininfarina for all your later cars?

Carrying a GB plate - wonder where it went on it's holidays?

Italy 🇮🇹 ? 😉

27,223 · February 1

3 minutes ago, lesapandre said:

Carrying a GB plate - wonder where it went on it's holidays?

Italy 🇮🇹 ? 😉

Isle of Wight!😄

45,149 · February 2

Ive got a few old “THE MOTOR” road test yearbooks, always a good read with carefully recorded data to a level thats simply not done anymore, following by a road test.

Theres a mechanically identical oxford on test in this edition…

Quite an interesting mix of cars….

Apparently a 6.2 litre Facel does 14 mpg at a constant 110mph, with a one way max of 134mph. Sounds like a fun test!

A diesel oxford was also tested… 0-60 ? 40 seconds (!)

27,223 · February 2

A guy I used to work with was a taxi mechanic years ago. He told me they used a fleet of diesel Oxford’s for a long time. He said they were incredibly slow and absolutely gutless but they coped with the mileage and were more fuel efficient than the petrol’s. Apparently the last one he worked on there was replaced by a mk2 Cavalier so that gives an idea how long they were in use.
He did tell me what the mileage was (I’ve forgotten now) but it’d gone round the clock multiple times. The only time they were switched off was to refuel or for maintenance/servicing as one driver clocked off another jumped into the drivers seat! Pretty sure he said it was body rot that finished them off in the end.

Wasnt the BMC diesel of that time actually originally a small marine engine?

20,960 · February 2

There were deffo marine variants, you see them in narrow boats sometimes. Not sure what came first though.

37mpg for such a glacial car seems unthinkable now, but I suppose it was different times and a full size saloon car cracking 30mpg wasn't really a thing...

13,223 · February 2

A former boss of mine had taxied Farinas in Blackpool in a previous life. They used to do about 50k miles a year.

17,682 · February 2

Plenty used as boat engines but it's just a B series converted to diesel.

45,149 · February 2

Longbridge brethren ; an old relic from our industrial past. And an Austin Cambridge.

29,212 · February 2

2 hours ago, HMC said:

A diesel oxford was also tested… 0-60 ? 40 seconds (!)

I want one of these so bad.

Did these come with column shift?

21,243 · February 2

2 hours ago, captain_70s said:

There were deffo marine variants, you see them in narrow boats sometimes. Not sure what came first though.

37mpg for such a glacial car seems unthinkable now, but I suppose it was different times and a full size saloon car cracking 30mpg wasn't really a thing...

Cracking 25 or even 20 was good for a full-sized saloon in the '60's unless driven very carefully.

The Austin 1800 was about 25 mpg.

The Cambridge was probably no slower as a diesel - than the equivalent MB Ponton and Fintail 180's or same-size Peugeot diesels. It just failed to capture world markets in the same way - probably not quite as durable as the aforementioned on rough roads.

27,223 · February 2

43 minutes ago, lesapandre said:

Cracking 25 or even 20 was good for a full-sized saloon in the '60's unless driven very carefully.

The Austin 1800 was about 25 mpg.

The Cambridge was probably no slower as a diesel - than the equivalent MB Ponton and Fintail 180's or same-size Peugeot diesels. It just failed to capture world markets in the same way - probably not quite as durable as the aforementioned on rough roads.

Even by the mid 70’s 30mpg from an average sized car was pretty good going. I think by the book, my 74 1.6 Capri is 27mpg.

Mind you, petrol is made for burning so it’s pointless trying to save it, right!?
Think about what was going on in the USA at the time. Massive engines, cheap fuel and a gas station on every corner.

3,654 · February 2

what was the difference between the Oxford and the Cambridge?

12,367 · February 2

3 minutes ago, bezzabsa said:

what was the difference between the Oxford and the Cambridge?

Badges mainly 🤣

1,249 · February 2

1 minute ago, Matty said:

Badges mainly 🤣

Oxford a bit sniffier ?

7,345 · February 2

15 minutes ago, bezzabsa said:

what was the difference between the Oxford and the Cambridge?

The rear wings were quite different,along with the radiator grille.Think the colours offered were different as well.

3,084 · February 2

23 minutes ago, bezzabsa said:

what was the difference between the Oxford and the Cambridge?

The shade of blue. Darker blue for Oxford, lighter for Cambridge

21,243 · February 2

The Oxford retained a metal dash I think - the Cambridge is a wood-grained formica finish I think. Most Cambridges were leather inside - the Oxford were more vinyl?

Wings were the same at rear. [edit - they are slightly different including the rear lights and bumpers]

All this 'badge engineering' was to keep the old dealers happy as well as traditional customers.

They would have been much better binning the lot and going for a BMC badge on these saloons IMHO.

Good cars but like a lot of BMC stuff not significantly updated during their later life and no real equivalent replacement in the marketplace afterwards. The Marina was a car with a very different character.

4,697 · February 2

33 minutes ago, bezzabsa said:

what was the difference between the Oxford and the Cambridge?

The rear end, the fin styling was different on both but apart from that they are pretty much identical to look at.

21,243 · February 2

32 minutes ago, jim89 said:

Oxford a bit sniffier ?

The was also an Austin Eton in the 1930's. 😂

7,345 · February 2

4 minutes ago, lesapandre said:

The Oxford retained a metal dash I think - the Cambridge is a wood-grained formica finish I think. Most Cambridges were leather inside - the Oxford were more vinyl?

Wings were the same at rear.

All this 'badge engineering' was to keep the old dealers happy as well as traditional customers.

They would have been much better binning the lot and going for a BMC badge on these saloons IMHO.

Good cars but like a lot of BMC stuff not significantly updated during their later life and no real equivalent replacement in the marketplace afterwards. The Marina was a car with a very different character.

The rear wings on the Oxford VI had more pronounced "fins" and vertical lights compared to the A60,with its sloping ones.On the previous Oxford V and A55 they both had taller still,fins and vertical lights.

Sign In

HMC BIOHAZARD B5 passat

Recommended Posts

comfortablynumb

Yoss

Christine

adw1977

Joey spud

Yoss

High Jetter

lesapandre

bezzabsa

Lankytim

lesapandre

danthecapriman

HMC

danthecapriman

captain_70s

artdjones

somewhatfoolish

HMC

Dyslexic Viking

lesapandre

danthecapriman

bezzabsa

Matty

jim89

Dobloseven

mintwth

lesapandre

bigstraight6

lesapandre

Dobloseven

Create an account or sign in to comment

Create an account

Sign in

Similar Content

The doom blue Passat - The Ministry 1 2 3 4

Browse Forums

Activity