Eyersey1234 Posted October 17, 2019 Posted October 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tadhg Tiogar said: Also, not having to make tooling for a straight-topped window frame saved money. Yes it will have done. The 240 must have been highly profitable for Volvo as basically the same car was in production for nearly 20 years
Tadhg Tiogar Posted October 17, 2019 Posted October 17, 2019 29 minutes ago, Eyersey1234 said: Yes it will have done. The 240 must have been highly profitable for Volvo as basically the same car was in production for nearly 20 years ....and some of the tooling will have originated on the 140/160. Eyersey1234 1
Steve79 Posted October 17, 2019 Posted October 17, 2019 Alfa 145 window line. All Alfa had to do was continued the line front the rear window down through the front window and it would have been perfect. Could have saved them a few quid which they could have put towards better electrics! MJK 24, Bamboocarman and crapcarcollector 3
LightBulbFun Posted October 17, 2019 Posted October 17, 2019 that the steering wheel in a Model 70 is ever so slightly to the right... (same goes for the seat in all Model 70's) Bamboocarman and stereotype 1 1
Steve79 Posted October 17, 2019 Posted October 17, 2019 Toyota C-HR - WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK It makes the Pontiac Aztec look like a contenter for car of the year. Toyota HQ "look guys, we've been churning out boring looking family car shit for years, anyone got any idea's for something new?" Design Team "lets design a car using only set squares" Toyota HQ "fuck it, go on then, how bad can it be!" Also why on earth decide to put the handle for the rear passenger door at the top? Would have looked fine where everyone else puts theirs. Could have taken a leaf out of Alfa's book as at least they had the common decency to put it somewhere convenient (and discrete) on the 156. spartacus, mitsisigma01, stripped fred and 10 others 11 2
djim Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 5 hours ago, Shep Shepherd said: The rear door window frames of the Volvo 200 Series estate car: The black paint on the later models makes the shape of the frames less obvious, but even so... That has bothered me for years since I was 5 and my dad had one. It got to the point many years ago where now I smirk every time i see one. I mean, everything to the rear of the door is different from the saloon. Why not just get some slightly different shaped glass and a window frame. Honestly how much can they have saved by doing that...grrr etc. hennabm, Sudsprint and Shep Shepherd 3
MorrisItalSLX Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 Estates with saloon doors are simply slack design. FB & EK Holdens suffer the same fate, but strangely the previous and subsequent models had different, squarer doors for the estates. My bother is with Toyota’s 4WD Estate design department. ”Should we make the side windows line up with the doors?” ”Nah, fuck it, let’s go the the pub.” Datsuncog, garethj, chodweaver and 2 others 4 1
Sir Snipes Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 9 hours ago, captain_70s said: Triumph Dolomite (see also 1300fwd, 1500 and Toledo) door handles sit at different heights/angles front to rear. You're welcome. They look more or less level but the rest of the car is dropping to meet the boot lip.
BorniteIdentity Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 How smoll the rear doors are on a Ford Sierra estate. When compared to the front door and the rear 1/4 window, they look absurd - like a train door or the middle door on a limo. inconsistant, michael t, Bamboocarman and 5 others 8
Tadhg Tiogar Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 7 hours ago, djim said: ..... Honestly how much can they have saved by doing that...grrr etc. Creating tooling is expensive. Every penny counts. adw1977 1
adw1977 Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 8 hours ago, LightBulbFun said: that the steering wheel in a Model 70 is ever so slightly to the right... (same goes for the seat in all Model 70's) IIRC there was a practical reason for the offset seat, which was to give space for a folded wheelchair at the side. At least they then put the steering wheel squarely in front of the driving seat. Bamboocarman 1
adw1977 Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 11 hours ago, captain_70s said: Triumph Dolomite (see also 1300fwd, 1500 and Toledo) door handles sit at different heights/angles front to rear. Oddly complicated rear door shape near the handle, too. Never noticed that before.
Cheggers Posted October 18, 2019 Author Posted October 18, 2019 Oddly complicated rear door shape near the handle, too. Never noticed that before. Almost a Hofmeister Kink...very BMW.
Tadhg Tiogar Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 8 minutes ago, adw1977 said: Oddly complicated rear door shape near the handle, too. Never noticed that before. Dates back to the Triumph Mayflower, which itself looked a bit weird as a 2-door, with rear passenger windows that looked as though they should have been part of a door.... FakeConcern, Datsuncog, Shep Shepherd and 7 others 10
adw1977 Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 Ah, the Triumph Mayflower. An entire car that can't be unseen! blakey79, LightBulbFun, Yoss and 12 others 10 5
bunglebus Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 23 minutes ago, Tadhg Tiogar said: the Triumph Mayflower, which itself looked a bit weird.... No shit. One of the ugliest cars ever along with that Daimler Dart thing that looks like a deep sea fish. Anyway this one always annoyed me when it came out; Side windows should line up. That's just the law. As for this Looks like the front and rear were designed by different teams. Tamworthbay, FakeConcern, stereotype and 1 other 3 1
bunglebus Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 8 hours ago, Steve79 said: Toyota C-HR Toyota seem to be on a mission to make the rear of their cars as awkward and ugly as possible lately Bamboocarman, stereotype, Sudsprint and 1 other 4
bunglebus Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 Here's one that always annoyed me - 5 series exhaust not quite in the middle Assuming that was in case a tow bar was fitted but...yuk. FakeConcern, madwelshman, Barry Cade and 2 others 5
Sir Snipes Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 18 minutes ago, bunglebus said: Here's one that always annoyed me - 5 series exhaust not quite in the middle Assuming that was in case a tow bar was fitted but...yuk. More likely to ensure it missed the suspension and diff?
Shep Shepherd Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 ^ Incredibly, that was the official line from Volvo's head of styling
LightBulbFun Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 1 hour ago, adw1977 said: IIRC there was a practical reason for the offset seat, which was to give space for a folded wheelchair at the side. At least they then put the steering wheel squarely in front of the driving seat. Aye I know why they did it and I talk about in my thread (the chair and wheel was off set to the right specifically as although the Model 70 is a 2 door machine, they really only wanted you using the left hand side to get in and out, ie the one closest to the kerb) but I just never noticed the steering wheel thing before until inspecting Dolly up close at the FoD a couple months back and now you seen it you can't unsee it as per the title of the thread funnily enough the handle bar variants have the handle bars smack bang in the centerline of the car (although I cant quite tell if the actual handle bar is welded offset in relation to the 2 forks or not)
Steve79 Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 1 hour ago, bunglebus said: Here's one that always annoyed me - 5 series exhaust not quite in the middle Assuming that was in case a tow bar was fitted but...yuk. As an E28 owner I had actively been trying to forget about the offset silencer, so thanks for that! ? bunglebus, Bamboocarman and UltraWomble 3
Supernaut Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 10 hours ago, Steve79 said: Toyota C-HR - WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK It makes the Pontiac Aztec look like a contenter for car of the year. Toyota HQ "look guys, we've been churning out boring looking family car shit for years, anyone got any idea's for something new?" Design Team "lets design a car using only set squares" Toyota HQ "fuck it, go on then, how bad can it be!" Also why on earth decide to put the handle for the rear passenger door at the top? Would have looked fine where everyone else puts theirs. Could have taken a leaf out of Alfa's book as at least they had the common decency to put it somewhere convenient (and discrete) on the 156. I'd say just stupid ugly crossover / SUV / compromised piles of shit / whatever you want to call them, in general. Why do vehicles that are both scream-out-loud ugly and also massively impractical sell like fucking hot cakes?! People are stupid. I do sometimes think the human race deserves its inevitable extinction caused by its own hubris. The C-HR is four-wheeled evidence of that. The other day, outside St Abbs, I was walking along a path next to a narrow twisty little road. A grey C-HR on personal plates pulled up and stopped in the road. No hazards, nothing. The two doddery old fuckwits in the front were fannying about with the sat nav or whatever. They sat there for ages on a narrow road with poor visibility with no hazards on. It's not as if they could have pulled into the clearly visible car park about 100 yards further along to do that. No, because that would require one iota of intelligence. That iota of intelligence was already evidently absent by the fact they were driving a C-HR in the first place. My eyes were almost burning holes through the body panels as I walked past. Every time I see one it's driven incredibly badly, to the point you almost just want to give up driving knowing that other people can get away with driving so badly. I guess they're doing their best, judging by how little visibility it must have. I'm not a fan of them, it must be said. The styling of the C-HR, to me, looks like Toyota looked at the Nissan Juke and said "Yes! More. More of everything. More ugly, more compromised visibility, more general dumbfuckery." Lacquer Peel, RayMK, mullett471 and 9 others 7 5
Tadhg Tiogar Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 33 minutes ago, Supernaut said: .....how little visibility it must have..... It's a mobile blindspot in an industry that designs blindspots. stereotype and Supernaut 2
kinkersaab Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 SAME PIC I ALWAYS POST ON THIS QUESTION.. Amishtat, stereotype and madwelshman 2 1
Tamworthbay Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 My V70 is a big car but all round visibility is brilliant, my mate has a Mazda shitebox CX5 wankerwagon and it needs cameras for reversing as you can see the square root of fuck all out the back. Stupidity for the sake of fashion. Squirrel2 and Bamboocarman 2
NorfolkNWeigh Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 28 minutes ago, kinkersaab said: SAME PIC I ALWAYS POST ON THIS QUESTION.. Could have been worse they probably tried to use the 1800's doors, there wasn't a long one of those either.
vulgalour Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 Toyota Celica face. Right hand side you've got two headlights for eyes, the bit between for the nose, and below on the bumper a great big mouth going YAY! chodweaver, Stanky and stereotype 3
vulgalour Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 Ford Fiesta dashboard face too. Vents for eyes, hazard button for a nose, and the CD slot for a mouth. madwelshman, stereotype, Bamboocarman and 4 others 4 3
vulgalour Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 BMW 7 series rear indicators, it's like they forgot to design them in and threw them on at the last minute. Either drop them into the rest of the light cluster, or bring the rest of the light cluster up to meet them, not this. stereotype, Tamworthbay and chodweaver 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now