Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1318693

Alright, any guesses for the numberplate on this one? I'm vaguely interested in buying it on the off-chance that the seller isn't trying to hide a fuckton of rust-related advisories. My best guess was NEB658R but apparently that's not it, and I've drawn a blank with every similar combination I can think of.

1976-triumph-stag-604e8945b7dbc.thumb.jpg.d3c666ccb0fe1caf0935a9eb607cbb44.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, solderblob said:

https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1318693

Alright, any guesses for the numberplate on this one? I'm vaguely interested in buying it on the off-chance that the seller isn't trying to hide a fuckton of rust-related advisories. My best guess was NEB658R but apparently that's not it, and I've drawn a blank with every similar combination I can think of.

1976-triumph-stag-604e8945b7dbc.thumb.jpg.d3c666ccb0fe1caf0935a9eb607cbb44.jpg

Says it's P reg in description, just send them a message, if they've nothing to hide they'll give you the details.

Posted
4 hours ago, solderblob said:

https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1318693

Alright, any guesses for the numberplate on this one? I'm vaguely interested in buying it on the off-chance that the seller isn't trying to hide a fuckton of rust-related advisories. My best guess was NEB658R but apparently that's not it, and I've drawn a blank with every similar combination I can think of.

1976-triumph-stag-604e8945b7dbc.thumb.jpg.d3c666ccb0fe1caf0935a9eb607cbb44.jpg

Maybe this?

stag_m10.jpg

The mileage on the history doesn't match, so maybe not. If it is, it's rotten as a peach, and has more electrical problems than a Tesla in a swimming pool.

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, SteersWithThrottle said:

Maybe this?

 

HOLY SHIT YOU ACTUALLY FOUND IT. Thank you!

And just as expected:

stagmot.thumb.jpg.d8972f4daf194ee87fd28909402cd5aa.jpg

Posted

That Puma is nice, I wonder how good the arches are up close?

Posted
22 hours ago, Justwatching said:

Poor thing.  It didn't deserve that.  It's worth maybe 10% of what he's asking too, which means it'll stick around for ages, gradually reducing.  At least some of us know how to realistically price a car!

Posted
15 minutes ago, cort16 said:

That Puma is nice, I wonder how good the arches are up close?

Arches don't look too bad from a distance, do they?  MOT history says it's seen the welder a couple of times but nothing particularly surprising on a Puma.  Looks like it was parked up from 2017 until Dec 2020, failed an MOT, got re-MOT'd in Jan 2021 and failed again, then got repaired and put up for sale.  Nasty Barum tyres on it though, if any car deserves decent rubber it's these.

Posted
6 minutes ago, phil_lihp said:

Arches don't look too bad from a distance, do they?  MOT history says it's seen the welder a couple of times but nothing particularly surprising on a Puma.  Looks like it was parked up from 2017 until Dec 2020, failed an MOT, got re-MOT'd in Jan 2021 and failed again, then got repaired and put up for sale.  Nasty Barum tyres on it though, if any car deserves decent rubber it's these.

I had one exactly the same as that and I spent ages fannying around putting rear arches in it. The only thing I didn't like about it was the roof was bit too low and that metal gear knob on cold mornings!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...