Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What's the betting its something with 6 cylinders and German :)

 

Posted

So the a30 sold to a nice guy that was going to do father and son stuff together with it....

ECF0B0D5-3108-4E01-A339-FD60EE7F7251.thumb.jpeg.d6420eb8cea94276c6be55bf0e7c41f4.jpeg

And no further plans lined up to be honest. A bit busy at the moment and no itches that need scratching (at least at the moment!)

  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

It’s been an eventful recent time with family and cars both.

Long story short- the 4 speedBerlingo had a tired 1.6 hdi lump and was pretty tired on whatever basis you judged it. On the odd occasion when warmed up it would hang onto it’s revs when changing up, having had a runway HDI once already I decided to ditch it.

Forgive me forum for I have sinned. It’s not shite and it’s an Audi. A6 2.7v6 TDI QUATTRO tiptronic is it’s full title. It’s a 2006 and has a particularly nasty VED band. But it works and is faultless and cheap. Could do with one new tyre. But that’s it. Is it vain to say I look respectable in it? No apologies necessary to the masses. It’s made me start wanting something extra turn of the millennium VAG like a golf/ beetle  V5 Or a TT or an A2 Once again, sorry. At the time I worshipped stuff like that, aged 20 and a penniless student. Sorry again. Ohh soft touch plastics. I think I need counselling.

7F5AE83C-472C-40B3-98FF-A93FDA6CA966.jpeg

86CCFBBE-F2F1-407E-AB1A-3B023EFCF5B3.jpeg

Posted

The auto in the Quattro is not cvt, i was particularly keen to avoid a flakey auto gearbox - it’s the 2wd auto on these that’s a bit flakey “selectronic”, this 6 speed tiptronic is supposed to be pretty robust. Certainly pretty impressive; not DSG Avant grade But nicely matched to the engine and never caught napping.

I think I need to buy a trabant Or something dynamically awful to offset my non shite footprint

Posted

Stuff the H8RS, that looks ace.

My 75 is in a horrific VED band because it's an automatic but I love the car so don't give a monkeys.

Posted

I really want to hate VAG. Yet they're comfortable, almost all go well, well specced, nice places to sit, generally inoffensive looking and plentiful of parts. It's why we have a 196k example of a A4 B8 still after 3 years with zero plans to replace. 

There is sweet spots of VAG. If you hit the right ones they're decent machines. Get the wrong ones they're horrendous. Many just do what the yanks say, Nickle and Dime you with many small but persistence different problems. 

Posted

I don't understand the VAG hate but I think it's probably something to do with the anti-shite semi "premium" brand status together with the scene/tax around older cars which is daft but probably less so than say for classic Fords.

Personally I've owned dozens of cheaply bought and mostly poorly maintained VAG vehicles which have all provided charming, rugged, and typically reliable transport. They're not perfect but what is?

I bet that Audi is a lovely thing to cruise (blast?) around in. Well bought!

  • Like 3
Posted
18 minutes ago, marm said:

I don't understand the VAG hate but I think it's probably something to do with the anti-shite semi "premium" brand status together with the scene/tax around older cars which is daft but probably less so than say for classic Fords.

I think it's the fact that they're overrated - the myth of superior build quality and reliability still persists when a Mk4 or Mk5 Golf is no better built or more reliable than the equivalent Focus.  They're not actively bad cars - some of them have annoying faults, but then so do most brands.  I've had a number of Audis and quite liked them.

  • Like 2
Posted

I find one of the most annoying day to day niggles on early 00s VAG is the rubberised coating they used to (still?) put on switches/ buttons etc. It sort of goes soft/ gooey or peels off and feels like someone’s smeared a half eaten wine gum over it. Perceived quality own goal.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

So do early 2000 Renaults. A cleaning product called Elbow Grease is supposed to work well. 

Our 2010 A4 did away with the rubberised coating and went for smooth plastic made in high quality injection moulds. So still looking mostly fine after almost 197k miles. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, wuvvum said:

I think it's the fact that they're overrated - the myth of superior build quality and reliability still persists when a Mk4 or Mk5 Golf is no better built or more reliable than the equivalent Focus.  They're not actively bad cars - some of them have annoying faults, but then so do most brands.  I've had a number of Audis and quite liked them.

It's fair to argue that VW lost their competitive edge around the turn of the century, and that at times they have traded on reputation and perceived quality. But at the same time there do seem to be more Mk4 Golfs still on the road than there are Mk1 Focuses about.  At least around here...

It always seemed that the Focus was the first car that really gave the Golf a run for it's money. Given that the Golf came out in the mid 70s (and remained light years ahead of anything Ford were making throughout the 80s) you can see how VW built their reputation. I reckon up to the end of the 90s VAG stuff WAS better built than most of the competition, at least from Europe. Not always better to drive, obviously.

For me the early 00s is where they lost it slightly... the cars becoming bloated and full of plastic rather than their solidly engineered predecessors. But they made cars that people wanted.

 

  • Like 2
Posted

My 80 Cabrio has excellent build quality. Every nut and bolt looks well engineered  and isn't rusted solid. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

I remember my dad came back without his company mk1 vectra one day but with a new b5 Passat. Small things but I remember the purple backlighting and how the door hinge had this engineered progressive opening feel. I suppose those little details (oh plus the air vents whose slats would close flush) had a certain appeal to some. I loved those details aged 16. Sad but true.

  • Like 3
Posted
On 9/15/2020 at 7:48 PM, wuvvum said:

a Mk4 Golf is no better built or more reliable than the equivalent Focus

This kind of reminded me I really should own a mk1 focus before they all disappear. I've had a Mk4 Golf and it was good. Not perfect, and admittedly a bit dull in some respects, but for a cheap car, hard to complain, very well built, felt classy in spite of age and mileage, went well, and cheap to keep. It had a few silly issues but nothing major broke in my ownership. I absolutely loved my Ford Ka, but despite being a low mileage, well maintained car, in a brief period of ownership it fell apart in front of my eyes, and would have made for expensive motoring if I'd kept it long term.

Just had a look on eBay. Hardly any Mk1 Focusses for sale. Loads and loads of Mk4 Golfs. The Focus might have handled well and had nice plastic in it but in terms of long term ruggedness it's hard to beat old VAG shite. For me long term survival is really what defines build quality...

  • Like 2
Posted

The Focus rusted worse than the Golf, but I think the other reason there are more Golfs around is that the residuals were higher because VAG so they're less likely to have been scrapped.

  • Like 2
Posted

I did look at HML and from memory year 2000 models still around 11k foci and 12k golfs- I think they shifted about 130k foci that year in the uk and a lot less golfs, so the rate of attrition is certainly different.

edit- here are uk golf registrations doesn’t have year 2000 but presumably not much different than 2001 

C66C0578-B9B7-4F59-9B3E-D68CF0A7526B.thumb.png.952a4152224529426c8475f8031e5d8b.png

Posted

I've just binned a perfectly functional food mixer because it's "soft touch" plastic went all Golf mk4.

Isopropyl alcohol, petrol, thinners: nothing would get rid of the slime.

 V5 engine,.  Would like to try.  Did they ever do a 2 door Bora?

Posted
1 hour ago, HMC said:

Ps whilst I remember here’s a golf v5 I’ve just bought

6D2DCB5D-9198-48EB-873E-A7D475ED5E97.png

ooh nice. auto or manual?

Posted

i had a passat V5 a few years back, ive had some juicy cars in my time (v8 M3 etc) etc, but my GOD that V5 was the worst car ive ever owned on fuel , sounded nice but  averaged about 13 mpg.

 

passat.JPG

Posted

We all know gumtree can be a dangerous place (spoiler alert). In and around broken x boxes and unwanted exercise equipment of course is the car section. It seems to bring out of the woodwork people only able to type numbers in response to adverts (offers of money? It’s never very clear) I managed to string a few sentences of actual words together and as a result I have another car.

I seem to have forgotten I already own a mk4 golf as I have bought another one. 

85B40042-5283-4D40-A8DE-ECA71D3170D1.thumb.jpeg.3788646740fcd51b86a3bcdb044dbcad.jpeg
 

It’s a 2000 X 1.6 se manual in a tasteful black with tan velour. It drives “ok” as it is a golf mk4, I can’t really describe it as driving “well”. It’s just turned 20 years old and has no rust. Some minor touch parking but it’s pretty tidy. It is 20 after all. SE in y2k meant a choice of either a sunroof OR climate control. Our buyer decided on the latter and it still works. 
 

This was registered at a time where there was much hand wringing about cars being cheaper in Europe. It might be for that reason that it had its PDI in Belgium, yet is a uk, rhd spec with mph instrument pack etc, has a south west London registration but it’s first service in Barnstaple, north Devon (where I picked it up from) 

Anyway, where’s the fun in having a set of golfs when you don’t take pictures of them both together......

6FE61D9C-8C42-4AA7-8C17-31FACBA52597.thumb.jpeg.0a8d31830ab812c40528d25f58efa42e.jpeg

2E0E5298-D090-40FB-8E41-D1E851DB05A2.thumb.jpeg.a6ccd7af13b5f60bd8b70f3c12823997.jpeg

BC86E625-C253-46E6-AACB-FC5FF2ADC978.thumb.jpeg.e6adf793d89bcef2cc66816babf1a491.jpeg

567F64A4-80F5-4659-A379-3A4DA3FEF4AC.thumb.jpeg.572a7514b680c57cc47cb453b0994fba.jpeg

3E1826CB-68DD-40B5-BA6B-AB5BDD2C0543.thumb.jpeg.ebeac4e5d0e36e3081ec8f2208109c9f.jpeg

 

  • HMC changed the title to HMC motors- a GOLF set (more VAG)
Posted
On 9/17/2020 at 9:48 PM, marm said:

ooh nice. auto or manual?

Manual. I’ve googled the engine code and it’s the 170 rather than 150 BHP (something to do with more valves apparently )

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/17/2020 at 8:44 PM, Asimo said:

  Did they ever do a 2 door Bora?

On 9/17/2020 at 8:49 PM, sdkrc said:

I wish

unnamed.jpg

no but people have made them

 

bora.jpg

Posted

ps audi wanker vag bummer german apologist etc :D

bit like me - no need for it but wanted one so did

sounds like you did too

not an airbag one is it?

Posted

Nothing wrong with the Mk.4 Golfs, as long as you avoid the 1.4 16v. Gutless. Low-geared. Not a motorway car. Guess which one my sister had?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...