Jump to content

Cars you didn't know existed until very recently.


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/31/2021 at 2:42 PM, chaseracer said:

Tell me that's not just a re-panelled GLE 'coupé'...

image.png

image.png

In my eyes, that Ford Kuga looks like a type of Aston Martin Crossover type thingy:

20211101_225503.jpg

Posted

Further proof that we ran out of car names in 1990, the Skoda Enyaq

image.thumb.png.97238496dbeb4897f516694d30617fe2.png

Posted
2 hours ago, bunglebus said:

Further proof that we ran out of car names in 1990, the Skoda Enyaq

image.thumb.png.97238496dbeb4897f516694d30617fe2.png

Enya? Isn't she a singer? 🤔 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Leyland Worldmaster said:

Enya? Isn't she a singer? 🤔 

Not so's you'd notice.🙂

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
9 hours ago, Leyland Worldmaster said:

Enya? Isn't she a singer? 🤔 

Orinoco Flows Knows.

  • Haha 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Austat said:

Citroën DS 19 Coupé GT Bossaert:

15011078417_87e91a4684_k.thumb.jpeg.8a0b2f05601f3d1cf8b44ef54a41c7c9.jpeg

Citroën DS Coupé GT 19 Bossaert

tumblr_6bb86049bb819adabee0c187efb01972_7416394f_1280.thumb.jpeg.6c2d046c14bc0dcdccd4e74e37844590.jpeg

Wow. I think I‘ve just found my perfect car.

Posted
On 11/3/2021 at 7:10 AM, bunglebus said:

Further proof that we ran out of car names in 1990, the Skoda Enyaq

image.thumb.png.97238496dbeb4897f516694d30617fe2.png

Maybe "Enyaq" is one of the many words that the Eskimos use for "shite".

Posted

I saw what I thought was a Nissan Cube in London the other day, but it had Suzuki badging. Can't seem to find it online.

Posted

Alto Lapin? That's quite square.

lapin.jpg.6174c20578ac277fa17595751c6e9b00.jpg

Or a Hustler?

hustler.jpg.e78fda743f4a69d993a1bc1cd4129884.jpg

Bit of a rabbit hole with JDM stuff as they have so many submodels; also the XBee

xbee.jpg.d07df3377fc71004f6900ea3f7731614.jpg

And the Wagon R Smile

wagonrsmile.jpg.27925182ae48b585405a837b8286ef9e.jpg

Posted

The last one looks most likely, but aren't they smaller than the cube?

Posted

The Aurus, a Bentley/Rolls copy from Russia.

At the point they talk about the infighting between designers and engineers and ending up with a ugly hippo. I thought about the Allegro.🙄.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Remspoor said:

The Aurus, a Bentley/Rolls copy from Russia.

At the point they talk about the infighting between designers and engineers and ending up with a ugly hippo. I thought about the Allegro.🙄.

 

It looks like a Chrysler 300C that has got it on with a RR Ghost. 

Still admire them for starting from scratch though. 

Also, the blunt honesty is refreshing. No flowery language used to describe the design and development. 

Thank foe sharing! 😎😎😎

  • Like 2
Posted

Today I learned that in the eighties NASA spent a lot of time developing a Chevrolet Celebrity powered by a Stirling engine.   Despite a very detailed paper on the vehicle there isn't actually a picture of it so here's a similar one.  Yes that is essentially a mk 2 Cavalier. 

1986 Chevrolet Celebrity 2.5.jpg

They got it to be marginally quicker and fuel economy went from 27 to 41mpg.  It must have been a strange thing to drive though and require a period of warming up before it could move.

 19880002196.pdf (nasa.gov)

Apparently Stirling engines are still under consideration by NASA for deep space missions using Uranium-235 as a heat source.

Posted
2 hours ago, cort1977 said:

Apparently Stirling engines are still under consideration by NASA for deep space missions using Uranium-235 as a heat source.

Pu238 would make more sense?

Posted
10 hours ago, somewhatfoolish said:

Pu238 would make more sense?

Yes, but needs much more shielding.  

The Americans have experimented with Pu238 in the past, there were various listening stations in the Arctic powered by these sources and they actually lost at least one high in the Himalayas trying to listen in on Chinese nuclear tests.  That Time The CIA Lost A Nuclear Device On An Indian Mountain | by Erik Brown | Lessons from History | Medium

Apologies for thread drift.

Posted

It was more that U235 is a rubbish heat source unless it's in a fission reactor and gone critical.

Posted
On 11/7/2021 at 4:28 PM, cort1977 said:

Today I learned that in the eighties NASA spent a lot of time developing a Chevrolet Celebrity powered by a Stirling engine.   Despite a very detailed paper on the vehicle there isn't actually a picture of it so here's a similar one.  Yes that is essentially a mk 2 Cavalier. 

1986 Chevrolet Celebrity 2.5.jpg

They got it to be marginally quicker and fuel economy went from 27 to 41mpg.  It must have been a strange thing to drive though and require a period of warming up before it could move.

 19880002196.pdf (nasa.gov)

Apparently Stirling engines are still under consideration by NASA for deep space missions using Uranium-235 as a heat source.

 

The old joke we used to tell about the Chevrolet Celebrity was how no celebrity would ever be caught dead driving one!

However, I do have to make one small correction.  The Celebrity wasn't a Mk 2 Cavalier.  Chevrolet had it's own Cavalier which, like the Vauxhall of the same name, was built on GM's "J" platform.  The Celebrity was built on the "A" platform which was little more than the "X" platform (Chevrolet Citation) with longer front and rear overhangs.  X and A cars even shared the same 104.9 inch wheelbase.  The smaller J-body Cavalier rode on a 101.2 inch wheelbase and was unrelated to the X and A cars.

 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
On 11/8/2021 at 3:14 PM, somewhatfoolish said:

It was more that U235 is a rubbish heat source unless it's in a fission reactor and gone critical.

The shielding issue comes about when you consider what you'd like to have versus what you can actually achieve; weight is critical for anything you want to put in space, and all the extra shielding (mostly for the electronics) makes a [sup]238[/sup]Pu power unit far heavier than a [sup]235[/sup]U one.

After that you're left with engineering your piece of kit to use the amount of power you [i]can[/i] provide...

 

EDIT: Lack of BBcode support is really annoying here!

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Madman Of The People said:

 

The old joke we used to tell about the Chevrolet Celebrity was how no celebrity would ever be caught dead driving one!

However, I do have to make one small correction.  The Celebrity wasn't a Mk 2 Cavalier.  Chevrolet had it's own Cavalier which, like the Vauxhall of the same name, was built on GM's "J" platform.  The Celebrity was built on the "A" platform which was little more than the "X" platform (Chevrolet Citation) with longer front and rear overhangs.  X and A cars even shared the same 104.9 inch wheelbase.  The smaller J-body Cavalier rode on a 101.2 inch wheelbase and was unrelated to the X and A cars.

 

You're right, it's so easy to get your mediocre and forgotten American cars from 40 years ago mixed up.

Which means GM had two slightly different FWD platforms introduced in the same year - madness.  Somehow, they still made money.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...