Jump to content

1971 MGB GT - Added wadding - see page 39


Recommended Posts

Posted
53 minutes ago, vtec-e said:

Gunsons still make a Colortune

That's just reminded me, someone on the forum was going to send one to me ages ago - which I'd be happy to lend or pass on to @Peter C if required. Can't remember who it was though

Posted

It sounds to me like you could do with balancing the carbs - a length of hose you can hold at at the mouth of each one with the other end stuck in your ear is all you need for this. A colour tune is  otherwise only useful if you have two - one for each pair of cylinders.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Dj_efk said:

It sounds to me like you could do with balancing the carbs - a length of hose you can hold at at the mouth of each one with the other end stuck in your ear is all you need for this. A colour tune is  otherwise only useful if you have two - one for each pair of cylinders.

Colour tune is at the plug, not the carb. Yes, hose was the old trick.

Posted

This wild MPG business has been bothering me ever since I did my man maths on Sunday afternoon. 

I took the MGB to another local Esso this evening.

782.JPG.e00c8aace116075ba4c5a421109c5920.JPG

Last time my fuel gauge was showing just over half (on Sunday, before my road trip), I managed to squeeze about 25 litres (4.5 gallons) into the tank.

I started to fill the tank today, to the point where fuel starting dribbling over the rear bumper and onto the ground.

783.JPG.f5a741b8b78aa3f66c1d17d60c369b32.JPG

And only 14.3 litres (just over 3 gallons) went in.

784.JPG.2a631e66a8fc796f3fa6c6aa1b873747.JPG

With the ignition switched on, the fuel gauge confirmed that the tank was full.

@Mr Pastry @LightBulbFun You were both absolutely right, the fuel gauge was telling porkies! 

785.JPG.880a41ba344f75e5d251dcf30bd09642.JPG

So, if I clocked up approx 100 miles and used approx 3 gallons of fuel, that means that the MGB averaged approx 33MPG. Not 18! 

That's a very impressive figure, although it requires further verification as the exact amount of miles that I clocked up and the amount of fuel that I used is unknown. 

I have taken a mileage reading and will brim the tank again in approx 100 miles. Let's see what happens.

From the petrol station I went home via one junction of the M40. The engine ran fine but I have a feeling that it has less oomph at lower engine speeds. I might tweak the carb mixtures back up a little tomorrow.

I'm definitely winning.

More soon.

 

  • Peter C changed the title to 1971 MGB GT - Fuel tank brimmed, new MPG reading calculated - see page 39
Posted
8 minutes ago, Peter C said:

This wild MPG business has been bothering me ever since I did my man maths on Sunday afternoon. 

I took the MGB to another local Esso this evening.

782.JPG.e00c8aace116075ba4c5a421109c5920.JPG

Last time my fuel gauge was showing just over half (on Sunday, before my road trip), I managed to squeeze about 25 litres (4.5 gallons) into the tank.

I started to fill the tank today, to the point where fuel starting dribbling over the rear bumper and onto the ground.

783.JPG.f5a741b8b78aa3f66c1d17d60c369b32.JPG

And only 14.3 litres (just over 3 gallons) went in.

784.JPG.2a631e66a8fc796f3fa6c6aa1b873747.JPG

With the ignition switched on, the fuel gauge confirmed that the tank was full.

@Mr Pastry @LightBulbFun You were both absolutely right, the fuel gauge was telling porkies! 

785.JPG.880a41ba344f75e5d251dcf30bd09642.JPG

So, if I clocked up approx 100 miles and used approx 3 gallons of fuel, that means that the MGB averaged approx 33MPG. Not 18! 

That's a very impressive figure, although it requires further verification as the exact amount of miles that I clocked up and the amount of fuel that I used is unknown. 

I have taken a mileage reading and will brim the tank again in approx 100 miles. Let's see what happens.

From the petrol station I went home via one junction of the M40. The engine ran fine but I have a feeling that it has less oomph at lower engine speeds. I might tweak the carb mixtures back up a little tomorrow.

I'm definitely winning.

More soon.

 

25 litres is not 4.5 gallons, there are just over 4.5 litres to the gallon.

Posted
3 minutes ago, chadders said:

25 litres is not 4.5 gallons, there are just over 4.5 litres to the gallon.

Yup multiply the litres by 0.22, 5.5 Gallons

 

 

Posted

Yeah, sorry, I meant 5.5 gallons. 100 miles divided by 5.5 gallons equals 18MPG, as reported on Sunday.

Posted

how far are you from Beko? he's got one of those suction gauges for balancing carbs that he uses on the vacuums

Posted
5 minutes ago, Noel Tidybeard said:

how far are you from Beko? he's got one of those suction gauges for balancing carbs that he uses on the vacuums

@beko1987 How far am I from you?

Posted

@Peter C you can buy a carb balancing tool cheaply enough - you need one if you’re keeping the MG

Posted

If that 33mpg is genuine and it performs well, there isn't much wrong with it.  Leave it well alone, and enjoy it.

Posted
2 hours ago, Peter C said:

Yeah, sorry, I meant 5.5 gallons. 100 miles divided by 5.5 gallons equals 18MPG, as reported on Sunday.

Yebbut your rebrimming sums are correct no? 100 miles, 14.29litres/3.2 gallons...  ~31.5mpg...?

Posted
12 minutes ago, Christine said:

 /\ whs ...The pump says 25 quid   , not 25 litres 

To be fair @Peter C did have a schoolboy moment earlier confabulating his 25 litres w 4.5 gallons, but his sums on the refill look good to me (even if the figures are a tad unrefined as yet)👍🏻

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, Peter C said:

@beko1987 How far am I from you?

I'm in Thame. If I'm at the office it's even closer as that's in Marlow.

I do have a water lift gague, although no fittings or adapters (even I don't use it totally correctly tbh)

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

At the Flower Farm soiree, @vtec-e had a good listen to the MGB's new sound system and enquired whether I put any wadding into the 6x9 speaker boxes. I hadn't. 

I had an opportunity to correct that today.

I removed the speakers from the boxes, to reveal nothing but two voids.

786.JPG.db53062f9cef9cbf4cd8c1a3394f474c.JPG

Rather than buying proper speaker wadding, I popped up into my roof void and nabbed a length of quilt insulation.

787.JPG.cae1319b0233640082cfbd2c4bd9a693.JPG

Which I stashed into the two speaker boxes.

788.JPG.6eefdd5b8634dddac53a9037693c373a.JPG

789.JPG.394039a14265fd2a9fb0a415243a4b4c.JPG

I re-fitted the speakers, disconnected the other two amplifiers and had a listen to how the 6x9s perform now. It might be my imagination but the sound is significantly softer than before. Win.

Nice, no cost mod.

Thank you @vtec-e

  • Peter C changed the title to 1971 MGB GT - Added wadding - see page 39
Posted
11 minutes ago, Christine said:

Did you play Itchycoo Park  afterwards ?  

I’ve got that MP3 on my iPhone!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...