Jump to content

Eye-catching black and whites


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 20/07/2025 at 20:06, Dyslexic Viking said:

Mazda 

019EE6EfB8xrf?dimension=1200x1200

The rear of this car just does not sit right in my eyes. The rear axle is located too far forward. If only it had sat more towards the C pillar. The design would have been proportional. There may have been space for rear doors too.

Oh, is is not a grump about the design, but why are the mud flaps located at an angle?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Remspoor said:

The rear of this car just does not sit right in my eyes. The rear axle is located too far forward. If only it had sat more towards the C pillar. The design would have been proportional. There may have been space for rear doors too.

Oh, is is not a grump about the design, but why are the mud flaps located at an angle?

I don't think the rear axle on these is bad, I actually think they are nice little cars.

And mud flaps were mandatory in Norway in the 1970s  and some at the importer possibly had a bad day at work when they installed them or this was the only way they could install them. Are my guesses.

Posted
1 hour ago, Remspoor said:

The rear of this car just does not sit right in my eyes. The rear axle is located too far forward. If only it had sat more towards the C pillar. The design would have been proportional. There may have been space for rear doors too.

Oh, is is not a grump about the design, but why are the mud flaps located at an angle?

Most early Mazda, Datsun, Daihatsu, Toyota had ungainly styling, but it kinda worked. Jap vs Euro eyes, I guess

Posted
57 minutes ago, High Jetter said:

Most early Mazda, Datsun, Daihatsu, Toyota had ungainly styling, but it kinda worked. Jap vs Euro eyes, I guess

The next generation of Japanese cars were even stranger, being an odd mix of scaled down American looks blended with styling that would be out of place on Matchbox original die cast cars & cars from Gerry Anderson's shows!

Luckily by the end of the 1970s they were looking more angular & closer to European cars in looks.

Posted

IsleofWightFerry.jpg.da57bc29538969fe2344192d4a48b985.jpg

Isle of Wight Ferry.

  • Like 5
Posted
4 hours ago, Remspoor said:

PamAyres.jpg.e1a8edff00609b00af5f0406d57d2038.jpg

 

 

Oi loved driving in my old MG

Though it’s not quite a Ferrari

I went to Kent, to Sittingbourne

But now it’s fucked and declared SORN!

(Say it as Pam or sing it like Madness)

Posted

image.png.97b64b94fbec0fb96f7905f994ea855d.png

Jim Parkinson driving his 1935 Rytecraft through the streets of Tokyo during a world tour, 1965.⁠

image.png.61b29b03b8bf6fe4c7514e86c70a762a.png

We have a winner! @LightBulbFun Does the 1984 date of first registration imply that it was brought back from the dead? 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, martc said:

image.png.97b64b94fbec0fb96f7905f994ea855d.png

Jim Parkinson driving his 1935 Rytecraft through the streets of Tokyo during a world tour, 1965.⁠

image.png.61b29b03b8bf6fe4c7514e86c70a762a.png

We have a winner! @LightBulbFun Does the 1984 date of first registration imply that it was brought back from the dead? 

pretty much, around November 1983, the DVLA closed the vehicle register/record, and ended the RF/VE60 (buff logbook) to V5 scheme, because of rampant fraud and number plate robbery on the go, if you had not computerised your old buff logbook vehicle by then you *had* to register it anew on an age related plate *unless* you pleaded your case and could prove the vehicle and its plate was historically significant and even still in a lot of those cases the DVLA did *not* record the original date of first registration

so generally you will see this sort of thing on Fancy high end or historically important vehicles (see @Six-cylinder's Rolls Royce 20/25 for example) but you wont see this sort of thing on something like a Morris Minor (unless said Minor was in itself historically significant in some way)

see also for example the registration marks of the great train robbery vehicles (which is a fun thing in itself because the registration mark on the lorry was a false plate used by the robbers, but then it got "legitimised" when that Lorry was computerised in 84! see my musings on that here https://autoshite.com/topic/50439-cae-dai-1950s-museum)

as a given practical example thats why @Andrew353w's "lowly" Skoda Octavia ended up on an age related plate back in 1984 despite a complete buff logbook being present, because back then likely it was not seen as historically significant enough to have its orignal number given back to it, thankfully in the 1990's the DVLA relented and allowed people to claim back original numbers with suitable evidence on a non transferable basis, the V765 scheme so I was able to help Andrew get its original mark back you can read about that here :) 

 

https://autoshite.com/topic/43497-christmas-collection-with-a-bit-of-help-from-shiply

 

  • Like 3
Posted
16 hours ago, Remspoor said:

apfilms.jpg.8321c4f32ec93965fd3482364ae63739.jpg

 

Gerry Anderson's place of business.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Richard_FM said:

Gerry Anderson's place of business.

And not a Stingray in sight

spacer.png

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...