mercrocker Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 That looks exactly what I was talking about on your other thread, Joloke.... I love the reference to "complaining letters to garage" - surely the ultimate Maxi accessory! Joloke 1
For Fiats Sake Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 1981! looks much older despite the revised bumpers! To me they look like they are two different cars joined together at the b pillars. I think the new mini countryman looks more like one of these than a real mini though.
alf892 Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 1981! looks much older despite the revised bumpers! To me they look like they are two different cars joined together at the b pillars. I think the new mini countryman looks more like one of these than a real mini though. yeah...........aren't all new cars shit?
dave21478 Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Fuel: Petrol Ahm oot. Lacquer Peel, Craig the Princess, alf892 and 8 others 11
nisfan Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Now i like most shite but why do i find these utterly miserable? I find the allegro ok, also the marina but these just seem like a grey damp cold november afternoon. Alexg, derskine, Joey spud and 1 other 4
Alexg Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 ^ +1. I think early Maxis look great, I'd love one, but these later specs look proper ungainly. I think it's the half-arsed attempt (but in fairness impossible task) of dragging an already slightly awkward 1960s design into the 80s. mouseflakes and michael t 2
eddyramrod Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 To me they look like they are two different cars joined together at the b pillars.Mine was! 30 years on, I'm doing well: I've resisted the urge to have another all this time. Mind, it's like the urge to buy a new BMW 116d: totally non-existant. No real resistance required!
For Fiats Sake Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Actually after a bit of reading up I've now changed my opinion from bland and old fashioned to hopeless and hideous. No one we knew at the time had one and they would buy anything that was British.
derskine Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 I hate Maxis so much. Potentially my least favourite car ever, modern cars aren't included in this though. eddyramrod 1
Bren Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 It looks so dated it's hard to believe they were still making them on an X registration. eddyramrod and trigger 2
eddyramrod Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 It looks so dated it's hard to believe they were still making them on a K registration.FTFY Tamworthbay, mercrocker, chaseracer and 1 other 4
anonymous user Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Well I like it, it also has a "suitable" numberplate, it nearly reads M(e)RD(e) Craig the Princess, Sudsprint, Supernaut and 1 other 4
Supernaut Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Well I like it, it also has a "suitable" numberplate, it nearly reads M(e)RD(e) My thoughts exactly, when I saw that plate! For Fiats Sake 1
trigger Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 That's so miserbaly shite that I'd love to have that as a daily to go to work in! Leave it exactly as it is and park it amongst the Audis and VW's in the car park. Talking about dated, If you think about it the Sierra came out a year after this, you can see why people said it was too futuristic.
forddeliveryboy Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Talking about dated, If you think about it the Sierra came out a year after this...Or that Citroën was replacing the GS after 11 years in production. I quite liked them, for being as far behind the curve as a GS was ahead. Vicar-quality.
Eddie Honda Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Or that Citroën was replacing the GS after 11 years in production. Hardly replacing. They threw some plastic shite on and put the tailgate on it should of had in the first place. I don't think many manufacturers of the time were immune to attempting shelf-life extension. Yes, the Maxi has a deficit in the looks department, but it did have 5 doors and 5 gears against the GS's 4 doors and 4 on the floor. Having had both, I'd rather drive the Citroen, but work on the Maxi.
MarvinsMom Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 i like the Maxi. And i prefer the Maxi 2 over the earlier versions. certainly it is no looker, but the theory was sound. with the Mini, ADO16, then a big jump up to the ADO17-Landcrab, the Maxi was to sit in between the 1100 and the 'crab. BMC got the sums wrong of course, turning over the Cowley mini production line over to the Maxi, and then the whole new factory at Cleckheaton to produce the E-series engine, and which produced many more engines than they could use, even when it was added to the Allegro. using the central section and the doors off of the Crab didn't help the cars looks, though it will have helped speed up development., was that why BMC used a cable change instead of a proper rod gear linkage? Donald Stokes said it would be a slow seller. he was right, it was!
Eddie Honda Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 prefer the Morris Nomad myself: mouseflakes, saucedoctor, Skizzer and 3 others 6
Dead_E23 Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Miserable to look at, but surprisingly enjoyable to drive. A bit like a giant Mini, appropriately enough.
Tamworthbay Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 I have never been a fan but my wife loves them, she has very fond memories of stretching out on the back seat and falling asleep when she was a kid. Her dad also had a Capri and a vitesse which she also loves, he didn't know then but he did me a big favour.........
I_am_Diesel Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Why does the boot have stone chips? Has it been driven in reverse at high speed over a long distance? oldcars 1
Squire_Dawson Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Sir Issigonis would've been much more concerned with function than form. So if it was ugly, it was because of practicality. MarvinsMom 1
djimbob Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Maxi's are for winners, I had one, lent it to a twat who borrowed it to drive to scotland and never came back! probably for the best
chodweaver Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 I love that there is equal measures of love* and hate for the Maxi on here! It was shockingly out of date from the outset - and I had a 1972 model in 1986. It was however desperately simple to fix, had a decent turn of speed, durable, quite economical, a hoot to hoon around in the snow in, and it was mahoosive inside. I still can't believe that it takes up less room on the road than a modern Astra. I'd have one again like a shot. Just not an auto. And a diesel would be perfect. Parky and forddeliveryboy 2
forddeliveryboy Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Hardly replacing. They threw some plastic shite on and put the tailgate on it should of had in the first place. Well, the replacement was more advanced that what replaced the GSa. Even after Peugoet said, "make it cheap, make our 305 not look cheap". Even Saab took until the late 70s to make hatchbacks - not everyone was as happening as Austin, Renault or Simca. Sir Issigonis would've been much more concerned with function than form. So if it was ugly, it was because of practicality. Nah, they just couldn't be arsed.
lisbon_road Posted May 6, 2016 Posted May 6, 2016 I remember fields full of these unsold around Oxford at about this time. Really spacious inside though, and comfy.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now