Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Still got its Colborne dealer plate on the back of it, too.  Just about legit still....

Posted

That 6/110 is terrible.

 

Over spray on rear wheels and on the door seal felt.

God awful wheels

Nice conversion for the rear suspension, but a tarted up paint job. Over spray on brake lines

No spare wheel cradle.

Time clock not original.

Description says only partly restored.

All adds up to it is way too much money.

 

Same dealer is also offering this.

https://www.autoscout24.com/offers/bmw-325-327-ix-mit-turbomotor-gasoline-black-3a760765-e973-455d-94dd-45b3aa67f041

640x480.jpg

Posted

Cheapest I think I ever saw one of these get to was £20k

 

I was offered a mostly fucked one for 6 bags in 2007; I bottled it, mostly through poverty but partly because of teh fearz.

 

Posted

I thought you were going to say do not paint!

  • Like 1
Posted

Can't believe no on else is getting on this. I've already emailed an offer. £300 rolls Royce for fucks sake!!!

Tease!

Posted

I'm pretty sure that Escrot belonged to that Bruce fella from the blue, who used to run the Area 52 workshop. It would have been a few years back now though- it was immaculate at the time.

Edit: looking at the plate, it's definitely the same one. Looks to have been used and abused in the meantime.

Edit again: Found the thread:

http://forum.retro-rides.org/thread/138494/85-sportswagon-magazine-shots-p12?page=1

  • Like 1
Posted

In Gainsborough, where soap and water have yet to be introduced. Apart from many other things, now that I think about it.

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Citroen-DS21-Pallas/264102917704

s-l1600.jpg

 

That bird must have walked there. Nothing that full of shit can fly.

 

 

.............

 

 

................

 

 

......

 

 

...........

 

 

...........

 

 

...............

 

 

...........

 

 

I'm NOT going there.

  • Like 3
Posted

Except it says it’s a 5-cylinder when actually the 2.0E is a four. Which is a shame.

 

Still nice though.

Are you sure? They did a 2.0 5 pot, the cubic capacity is 1994cc which tallies up with the details of this one.
  • Like 3
Posted

Are you sure? They did a 2.0 5 pot, the cubic capacity is 1994cc which tallies up with the details of this one.

All 100s bar the 1.8 were 5 cylinder weren’t they?

Posted

All 100s bar the 1.8 were 5 cylinder weren’t they?

The turbo-diesel was a four-pot.

Posted

Are you sure? They did a 2.0 5 pot, the cubic capacity is 1994cc which tallies up with the details of this one.

Four pot vorsprungs were1984cc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...