Jump to content

VW V5 engines


Recommended Posts

Posted

What is the score with these? A friend of mine has just bought one in UK (in a Bora no less). Were VW the only V-odd design or were there more that have fallen into obscurity? Sounds to me like a recipe for vibration. What was the perceived benefit of this arrangement?

Posted

Space I think! It's not V-shaped, the cylinders sit in the same head, so typically, not an actual V engine at all, but the buyers and journalists bought the 'v' thing of course. They're not powerful either.

Posted

It's not really a V, because that'd be impossible, it's a staggered in-line 5. Think it's basically a VR6 with a cylinder lopped off. They are much more compact than 'V' or in-line engines.

Posted

I have a recurring dream about fitting one of these enignes into a NSU Ro80.

Posted

VR in German vaguely translates as'Inline V'.

 

Well, the words that are missing do.

 

The 5 pot allegedly gives the economy of a 4 wirh the smoothness of a 6. They're close to the smoothness of an ok 6 pot, but they're not that good on fuel. 23ish in town, maybe 30 on a run. So only slightly less juicy than a VR6 and 40 bhp down.

Posted

Someone once told me that the V5 uses the same block as the V6, but one of the bores is unused. Don't know how true this is - I would have thought this would make for a rather unbalanced crank, but I don't know much about these things.

Posted

Only using 5 pots out of 6 would be mental. I can't see 'em doing that..

 

Having said that, I know a chap who melted a piston in his GS850 and just took the piston and rod out and blocked off the fuel pipe to the carb for that cylinder.

 

It didn't run well.

Posted

Here's the V5 head

 

Posted Image

 

and the VR6 block, can't find any pics of the V5 block so maybe wuvvum is right!

 

Posted Image

Posted

Engines have to work in complete sequence to 'work'! :lol: My dad's been driving round with three cylinders out of four working because he can't be bothered changing spark plug lead. :oops:

Posted

I used to have a V5 Toledo, the 170 bhp version. It was a great drive - loads of torque right across the rev range, and resonably quick, but the "economy of a four pot" is a load of bollocks. If I went on an, aherm, "spirited drive" round the lanes I was lucky to see 11mpg. It always felt like it could do with an extra gear at the top end. 130+mph on a derestricted autobahn was more than possible but you always wanted to change up again.

 

They don't really like regular unleaded either; you need to feed them Super to get the best out of them.

 

Beware of clutches though. They don't last particularly long and they're also DMF-tastic. I don't know what the situation is now, but when I had mine SEAT wanted £900+vat just for the flywheel,and it wasn't avaialble aftermarket. Obviously I just shoved a new clutch plate in and sold it.

Posted

The water holes on the VR5 head and VR6 block don't seem to match up unfortunately.

 

I know the early Laverda Jota motorbikes had what amounted to a 4 cylinder engine with the fourth cylinder missing, so it is possible to run an "incomplete" engine. British Twins were even worse, they had the middle two cylinders of a four so they would shake themselves to bits.

Posted

There's been all sorts of formations tried; X's, radials, opposed-piston. All with the hope that getting the cylinder angles and crank bobweights right will make a smooth, powerful, reliable engine. Funny we always come back to the same handful of basic designs.

I remember reading when the VR6 first arrived, that VW were going to create a whole family of odd formation engines.

The VR6/V5 cylinder heads remind me of the old Ariel 'Squariel' square-4 bike engines, with long intake ports running next to long exhaust ports, just to get fuel/air in one side, and exhaust gas out of the other. To get equal lengths all round, you end up with a complicated mish-mash like the Suzuki RG500.

Incidentally, the original Laverda Jota came with a 180 degree crank. And with that, vicious power delivery, and a penchant for making the pistons and rods homeless. They quickly changed it to the 120 degree crank, which solved the issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...