Jump to content

Marina Shite (long overdue updates- lots more Marinas...)


Recommended Posts

Posted

I think it's a bit of both. The plastics don't age well. For my Bedouin coupé I had to piece the dashboard together out of parts that came from several cars and it was a right pain to fit and get anything vaguely lined up. 

Mind you, the same applies to body panels. One of the long-term projects needs replacement doors. I tried four different passenger doors and each one fitted completely differently. A friend of mine tried fitting a bonnet from a 1972 Marina to another 1972 Marina. It wouldn't fit at all. Makes you wonder how they ever built them!

There is a book in progress. A chap did write one many years ago which I have been serialising in the Marina club magazine. Just need the time to finish it!

Posted

@MarinaJoshCould you direct me to a diagram or photo of the Ital front suspension with telescopic dampers?  Just interested to know how it was done, as I have never seen one and I can't find anything online.

Posted

Here you go. The top mount has the standard backplate used by the lever arm shocks. The top of the telescopic shock then mounts to a bracket on this.

A bracket is bolted to the bottom arm, which the shock then mounts to.

This set-up was designed by BL Special Tuning and was available throughout the production run. It was introduced as standard when production of the Ital moved to Longbridge in 1982.

Similar aftermarket kits were made by Spax and Demon Tweeks. These had a top mount which bolted over the top of the original lever arm, you had to remove the valve from the lever arm shock.

46700060_2249652081979429_2379056121252937728_n.jpg

Posted

Dear old British Leyland - why not do this from the start or early in the run? I expect because it saved £1.50 on a car with the lever arm.

Posted

Certainly an odd one, given it does transform the handling. It can only have been a cost measure. After all, they sold like hot cakes as they were and struggled to keep up with demand, so why bother changing it. Although it then makes the odd little details changing even stranger! I suspect the same applies for every car ever made though. 

Posted
5 hours ago, MarinaJosh said:

Here you go. The top mount has the standard backplate used by the lever arm shocks. The top of the telescopic shock then mounts to a bracket on this.

A bracket is bolted to the bottom arm, which the shock then mounts to.

This set-up was designed by BL Special Tuning and was available throughout the production run. It was introduced as standard when production of the Ital moved to Longbridge in 1982.

Similar aftermarket kits were made by Spax and Demon Tweeks. These had a top mount which bolted over the top of the original lever arm, you had to remove the valve from the lever arm shock.

46700060_2249652081979429_2379056121252937728_n.jpg

Were any tested by the motoring press with this change fitted ?

Given that the magazines of the time always criticised the handling, I wonder what they'd have made of it with this fitted.

Posted

I do wish BL had done more to cultivate a sporty image for some of its cars in the '70's as whilst Marina's sold very well it might have helped their image somewhat.

The 1.8TC version with the cool wheels was a fine looking motor but BL as usual dropped it. The HL looked good but wasn't quite the same somehow (IMO). Ford were good at adding a bit of Sporty appeal to a whole range of quite ordinary cars by selling more racy stuff like GT's & Sport versions. Look at the Escorts & Cortina's. 

BL always seemed to just be happy to cater to a "Terry & June" type image for it's mainstream motors.

 

Posted

There was the 1300GT which was considered quite cool at the time. 

A Marina GT would have worked. I think for a time they were as has been mentioned selling as many as they could make - then demand dropped off and it was too late.

Funny old BL. Their cars were sometimes just a bit frumpy and sensible - but always interesting.

Posted
34 minutes ago, ETCHY said:

Were any tested by the motoring press with this change fitted ?

Given that the magazines of the time always criticised the handling, I wonder what they'd have made of it with this fitted.

My original question re the front suspension was because I wanted to see how the top link was done - did it in fact have a proper top wishbone in place of the single lever arm, hence possibly better location/different geometry? No!

Handling was better with the Mk2 but this was due to anti-roll bars at both ends, and I would be surprised if the tele dampers alone would have made much difference as the lever arms were quite effective.

We had a Marina from new, and I drove it(and mended it) a lot.  I felt that it was a bit over-bodied and the weight distribution wasn't quite right, and the suspension seemed very flimsy for such a large car, compared with a Minor or Escort for example.

  • Like 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, lesapandre said:

There was the 1300GT which was considered quite cool at the time. 

A Marina GT would have worked. I think for a time they were as has been mentioned selling as many as they could make - then demand dropped off and it was too late.

Funny old BL. Their cars were sometimes just a bit frumpy and sensible - but always interesting.

You know i've just remembered they did do a Marina GT it was the Coupe I think.

Tbh though the fact i'd forgotten about it probably says it all. Nice but a bit lukewarm..

Posted

All kind of byways. Some 6-cylinder models in the Antipodes and badged as an Austin in the USA!

Posted

I was thinking about the 6 cylinder one.  That must have had interesting handling.

.th?id=OIP.p5b6Ky5S3ZINJDqN8uJg0AHaE7&pid=Api&P=0&h=180

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Mr Pastry said:

I was thinking about the 6 cylinder one.  That must have had interesting handling.

Review here:

Posted

The six cylinder was similar to the B series in terms of weight. The B series is a heavy old lump. That’s one of the reasons why BL Special Tuning focused on the 1.3 Marina. Better handling and can easily be tuned to higher performance. It then of course went on to be very successful until BL pulled the plug.

The marketing was definitely lacking in ambition. For the Marina, the expertise of American Filmer Paradise was employed. Even then it wasn’t a hugely aspirational campaign. Ford were the masters here even if the products were even more archaic than offerings from BL, the man in the street could believe his 1.1 base model was a rally winner, especially so with Mexico, RS and all the other special editions. Pulling the plug from taking the Marina rallying is a good example of this. Rather than directly funding race teams, BL race teams relied on the income from Special Tuning parts sales so didn't have the cash to keep the Marina going in motorsport alongside the Dolomite and the incoming TR7. See also the product placement own goals in The Professionals!

BL viewed the Marina coupé as the lesser model, rather than making it luxurious and desirable, it was cheaper and sat further down in the range. I wonder whether they got too caught up in making/marketing it as a cheap basic vehicle for fleet buyers.

The GT was the TC version of the MK2 coupé. The saloon TC became the HL.

The inclusion of telescopic shocks was overshadowed by how outdated the last of the Itals was.  The car was a bit of a joke by then and build quality had really tailed off with steel even thinner. They certainly rot more! Saying that, it still sold well enough. Personally, I think it was one of the more successful latter day BL facelifts. Certainly more convincing (in my eyes) than the Ambassador, the Series 3 Allegro or the Series 3 Maxi. I have owned 1.3 and 1.7 Itals and they drive very nicely. Easily comparable with a late MK2 Escort or a MK5 Cortina.

The main issue with the handling as standard is the softness of the lever arm dampers. Thicker oil can help. This softness leads to excess body roll. The anti-roll bars helped, but telescopic shock absorbers totally transform it. With a set of Spax adjustables they handle very well- a set of these can easily make up for no anti-roll bar. It's the same with the back end- the standard two leaf rear springs are very soft. Fitting three-leaf springs from an estate or four-leaf from a commercial can improve things. Police traffic cars had thicker torsion bars and a four-leaf rear. Once the suspension is made firmer (plus a touch of negative camber), it's surprising what you can leave behind in the bends. The other big improvement has been the introduction of polyurethane bushes, particularly on the front tie bars. Of course it helps that there's usually nothing left of the original foam rubber ones!

Posted

A little bit of insight here...

"BL viewed the Marina coupé as the lesser model, rather than making it luxurious and desirable, it was cheaper and sat further down in the range. I wonder whether they got too caught up in making/marketing it as a cheap basic vehicle for fleet buyers."

I remember Donald Stokes being interviewed on BBC Nationwide when the Marina was launched. There was a phone-in I think or at least questions were put on behalf of the public.

One little old lady asked why they did not keep the Minor in production - and I can remember Donald reassuring her that the Marina was the new equivalent - perhaps that is where they saw the 2-door Marina - a kind of no frills Minor replacement.

The 2-dr had design input from Sir William Lyons who had a seat on the BL board. He favoured the 2-window side elevation over a 3-window proposal.

Posted

As we're on the subject of the coupé, it's time for the third distraction!

Back in June I received a message from Danny Hopkins at Practical Classics. He was looking to sell his Limeflower 1971 coupé and was offering me first dibs for £veryreasonable. Limeflower is one of my favourite BL colours, plus this is another very early car. It was built in May 1971, just after the Marina was launched. Presumably the first owners wanted to wait until the new K plate came out on 1st August 1971, a shame as it would have been nice if it was a J plate!

A bit of background to the car. Danny bought it in 2020 after it had sat in a garage since the late 1980s. It looked rough with scabs everywhere but was certainly solid enough underneath. The interior was excellent, but it was let down by a hideous pop-up sunroof.

received_322289509217453.thumb.jpeg.90616a16159a59c57ae17820fe01a99c.jpegreceived_3271433589602094.thumb.jpeg.e83af3740dc099a245b00fa0fbaed4c9.jpeg

When Danny bought it I headed over to the PC workshop along with the Marina club chairman, Chris, to assess it. We then got called back to help strip it down and did various work on it along the way. It was then ‘rebuilt’ at the NEC Classic Motor Show in 2022. Of course, the time pressure meant this was only really the beginning. At some stage it had been fitted with disc brakes and suspension from a late 1971 on car. Danny wanted it refitted with drum brakes and early front suspension for the authentic experience. Eventually, a complete set appeared on eBay so the Marina ended back at mine for it to be stored and the work carried out. It returned to Danny in winter 2023. He then had some fun in it, used it for a few magazine features, but as is often the way other projects were calling.

received_2727067547571812.thumb.jpeg.67212833de06533dc904b38ece766f01.jpeg

137583258_3951329531551971_7192015465435922755_n.thumb.jpg.df35219c05e0c60bedc60cdaa2fa0ac5.jpg138220274_3951325018219089_4265851140251025383_n.thumb.jpg.39ed6675e5db132d88aca749f08accf5.jpg146404353_4018837841467806_4297304116923443549_n.thumb.jpg.04461c753393e88b935c95bbb77944c4.jpg

He had driven it a fair bit, although he advised me that when sitting in traffic it would run poorly and cut out. Sure enough, as we approached the McDonalds roundabout on the A505 near Duxford and the traffic built up, it started to struggle. This was an opportune moment to pull in and enjoy a piping cold miserable dinner. After eating, the traffic had settled and the car had cooled down. It then didn’t miss a beat all the way home, happily cruising along at 60+. Aside from the earlier problems, it actually drove very well. These were taken on the journey back:

IMG_20240624_192641.thumb.jpg.3e92e01763cae9064a69d12b0f72e527.jpgIMG_20240624_192701.thumb.jpg.62ac597af8f2faaed3f1b3eb421cbcf0.jpg

What then followed was several months of simple and very satisfying jobs. Things like getting rid of overspray, finishing off the fitment of a Webasto roof (the best we could, no template, incomplete fixings, a hole that wasn’t quite square and seemingly bits from more than one roof!), fitting badges and replacing damaged or missing trim. It’s always rewarding seeing those odd little details being sorted which totally transform the car.

IMG_20240703_115050.thumb.jpg.2b3f19db34f1e7596a5aa23408df808a.jpg

Mechanically it didn’t need a lot. The poor running when hot was traced to it running very rich. There was an odd mix of spark plugs too, some of which were different temperature ratings. The radiator was also leaking so a replacement was fitted from my stock. The other main issue was the gearbox which was very noisy and had lost synchromesh on second gear. A replacement was fitted from an Ital and the gearstick swapped to suit.

It’s still far from perfect. There isn’t a straight panel on it, a lot of that stems from some of the bodywork it had experienced prior to being taken off the road. Danny was let down on the paint job so ended up doing it himself outside, the sides are good but the horizontal panels have had some kind of reaction. None of that really bothers me. It has joined the ‘regular use’ fleet. Although it doesn’t get driven quite as much as the J reg saloon, it did come out regularly for the drive to work up until winter arrived and with the Webasto it is particularly enjoyable on a warm sunny day. Here are some pictures of it with some of the trim on. Since these the rear side windows have been taken out and fitted with the painted inserts and the stainless trim has been fitted under the rear side windows.

IMG_20240721_184702.thumb.jpg.de3ea55b10c356f994a37e5ff0ccde16.jpgIMG_20240721_184734.thumb.jpg.e2acb5cce7b5c80feaf3e566186f5ea2.jpg

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...