Jump to content

Austin Montego Estate - Occasional appearance of the rest of the fleet


Tommyboy12

Recommended Posts

Excellent purchase!

There was never a factory built 1.3 estate, the 1.3 engine was only ever available in the base saloon.  5 speed gearbox was an optional extra on the 1.3 and 1.6 base saloons and 1.6 base estates, so the gearbox could be original to the car or have been transplanted along with the engine.  Either way, this is probably the only Montego 1.3 estate in existence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bezzabsa said:

so you polished it yet??????

 

Take a polishing mop to those arches and I think it'll look like Swiss cheese afterwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fumbler said:

Take a polishing mop to those arches and I think it'll look like Swiss cheese afterwards.

naw, be pure unadulterated Brummie metal under that LOL....or 4 tins of Isopon P38

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bezzabsa said:

naw, be pure unadulterated Brummie metal under that LOL....or 4 tins of Isopon P38

montego 12.jpg
Hmm I wonder. It still has shape to it so I can't imagine it's all that bad as Maestrontegos(TM) go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did the 4 speed come from for these? The 5 speed was a VAG thing of vagueness and a linkage comprising self-ejecting plastic balljoints which waited until you were at traffic lights then sprang off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, somewhatfoolish said:

Where did the 4 speed come from for these? The 5 speed was a VAG thing of vagueness and a linkage comprising self-ejecting plastic balljoints which waited until you were at traffic lights then sprang off.

Both are VAG units I gather. This 5 speed seems to be very firm and tight but finding first was a pig because if I went for where 1st should be I got reverse. 1st seems to be more like it's between 1st and 3rd. Maybe a hangover of an engine change?

As promised some videos! Heavily compressed so apologies if they're a bit rubbish. This was genuinely the second attempt at starting with no aids whatsoever. I had easi start and tools at the ready and didn't need them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well in.

That econometer reminds me of my early days of DJing - we had a set of lightboxes that looked like that!

I'm sorry I won't be at FotU to meet you and shake you by the hand.  This is a preposterous car and I think it's awesome.  Hopefully it'll make the July photo for the AS 2022 calendar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

itf its same as the mk1 golf unit then itll need the bushes doing, my mk1 shat its gearchange at the lights i had to pop it back on and drive home in what ever gear i found first!

2 hours ago, Tommyboy12 said:

Both are VAG units I gather. This 5 speed seems to be very firm and tight but finding first was a pig because if I went for where 1st should be I got reverse. 1st seems to be more like it's between 1st and 3rd. Maybe a hangover of an engine change?

As promised some videos! Heavily compressed so apologies if they're a bit rubbish. This was genuinely the second attempt at starting with no aids whatsoever. I had easi start and tools at the ready and didn't need them!


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Mk2 golf, you adjust the linkage with a plate fitted, that locks the car in a gear, and then you do up the linkage clamp. Going into reverse instead of first a common symptom. No idea if these are the same, but I’m pretty sure it’s a similar gearbox.

My dad had a C plate estate many years ago. C608 YWK if I remember right. 1.6 engine but not high spec. He always wanted a countryman but wouldn’t have diesel, as many seemed to be. Great find, and must be impossibly rare now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Treated the old girl to some of the finest Landsail tyres! Fitted on my driveway too.

While the tyres fitted are 165R13 the Montego & Maestro owners club states that the 1.3L was fitted with 155 tyres and the 1.6L with 165 tyres. As such I have decided to go with the slightly skinnier tyre which might help a bit with rolling resistance and the low power on offer!

image.png.a6f7673a7a3e97cb74809f0eaf7e263f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tommyboy12 said:

Treated the old girl to some of the finest Landsail tyres! Fitted on my driveway too.

While the tyres fitted are 165R13 the Montego & Maestro owners club states that the 1.3L was fitted with 155 tyres and the 1.6L with 165 tyres. As such I have decided to go with the slightly skinnier tyre which might help a bit with rolling resistance and the low power on offer!

image.png.a6f7673a7a3e97cb74809f0eaf7e263f.png

I hope it doesn't handle like a TV stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I have questions.  Seeing as how British Leyland/Austin Rover almost completely ignored the American market, my only exposure to the Maestro & Montego came from old copies of CAR, beginning in the late 1980s (all of which I still have) and the interwebs, of course.  I must have been the only kid in all of North America to have lusted after an MG Maestro Turbo!

First, I have to say that Montego estate is a magnificent looking machine!  What I really want to know is was it really worth the savings in tax to downgrade from the original 1.6 S series to a 1.3 litre A+ series?  Am I wrong in thinking the engine from a BMC Mini dragging a Monty estate body behind it must have been the slowest thing on Earth?  Did the A+ series still have the gearbox inside the sump, like the Minis?  Will you be keeping the 1.3 or do you have plans to refit an original spec 1.6 S series and it's corresponding VW gearbox?

I can't wait to see this car restored to it's former glory!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saves quite a bit on the VED, the monty is pretty light for its size so unless you're carrying a full load of lead ingots the performance will be adequate. The 4 speed will be a pain on M-ways and other fast roads though.

  

5 hours ago, rickvw72 said:

On the Mk2 golf, you adjust the linkage with a plate fitted, that locks the car in a gear, and then you do up the linkage clamp. Going into reverse instead of first a common symptom. No idea if these are the same, but I’m pretty sure it’s a similar gearbox.

My dad had a C plate estate many years ago. C608 YWK if I remember right. 1.6 engine but not high spec. He always wanted a countryman but wouldn’t have diesel, as many seemed to be. Great find, and must be impossibly rare now. 

From what I can remember of ours(F plate 1.6L) there wasn't any adjustment, the rods with the balljoints just popped onto(and off again at the next lights) the bellcranks; we put up with it until the new part arrived and I got quite adept at jumping out, raising the bonnet and reaching down to the linkage and reconnecting it. IIRC it sat in the 2nd-3rd plane so you could still drive with not much clutch abuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Madman Of The People said:

Okay, I have questions.  Seeing as how British Leyland/Austin Rover almost completely ignored the American market, my only exposure to the Maestro & Montego came from old copies of CAR, beginning in the late 1980s (all of which I still have) and the interwebs, of course.  I must have been the only kid in all of North America to have lusted after an MG Maestro Turbo!

First, I have to say that Montego estate is a magnificent looking machine!  What I really want to know is was it really worth the savings in tax to downgrade from the original 1.6 S series to a 1.3 litre A+ series?  Am I wrong in thinking the engine from a BMC Mini dragging a Monty estate body behind it must have been the slowest thing on Earth?  Did the A+ series still have the gearbox inside the sump, like the Minis?  Will you be keeping the 1.3 or do you have plans to refit an original spec 1.6 S series and it's corresponding VW gearbox?

I can't wait to see this car restored to it's former glory!

 

No, the engine is a conventional end-on gearbox layout using the A-Series as featured in the Marina and Ital, but mounted transversely. With 70bhp and good torque characteristics, they're nowhere near as sluggish as you might expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 'econometer' more than makes up for lack of tachometer on the main cluster.

I am more impressed that item works over the stereo. 

Can't see this old wardrobe being any slower than the low pressure tdi astra I had tbh. Should be more than pleasant enough on most roads unless at full load capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tommyboy12 said:

...The Montego & Maestro owners club states that the 1.3L was fitted with 155 tyres and the 1.6L with 165 tyres.

Early Maestros came with two designs of 13" wheel rim. Oblong holes for 155 section and round holes for 165 section tyres.

Montego 1.3/1.6 Base came with 165 section tyres and thus round hole 13" rims only. Unless of course you specified the optional metric sized TD rim and tyres, in which case you got an enlarged version of the typical Metro wheel of the time with a snazzy squared off centre cap rather than a full wheel cover. These were unbelievably rare, as at launch the Montego 1.3/1.6 Base was the only model in the range to come with conventional imperial wheels and tyres and not the snazzy metric TD stuff as featured on every other model in the range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Madman Of The People said:

Okay, I have questions.  Seeing as how British Leyland/Austin Rover almost completely ignored the American market, my only exposure to the Maestro & Montego came from old copies of CAR, beginning in the late 1980s (all of which I still have) and the interwebs, of course.  I must have been the only kid in all of North America to have lusted after an MG Maestro Turbo!

First, I have to say that Montego estate is a magnificent looking machine!  What I really want to know is was it really worth the savings in tax to downgrade from the original 1.6 S series to a 1.3 litre A+ series?  Am I wrong in thinking the engine from a BMC Mini dragging a Monty estate body behind it must have been the slowest thing on Earth?  Did the A+ series still have the gearbox inside the sump, like the Minis?  Will you be keeping the 1.3 or do you have plans to refit an original spec 1.6 S series and it's corresponding VW gearbox?

I can't wait to see this car restored to it's former glory!

 

The engine will stay yeah. Sourcing a 1.6L would be pretty difficult unless I find a breaker car and in reality you're only gaining a few hp (86hp vs. 68hp). The 1.6 estate is 1015kg Vs. 940kg for the 1.3 saloon so it's effectively like carrying a passenger at all times in a 1.3 Saloon. I'm not worried about performance as I'm racing a 1L Citreon AX!

Gearbox wise my understanding is they are the same between the 1.3 and 1.6 but the 1.6 had 5 speeds were as that was optional on the 1.3. They actually used the inline version of the A-series to make the end-on gearbox FWD setup. So no gearbox in the sump.

The road tax is £100 a year cheaper on the 1.3 too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Eyersey1234 said:

Why is the road tax cheaper on the 1.3?  

Apparently the Welsh have a real soft spot for an A Series 1275 lump and like to show this by rewarding owners with discounted RFL. Apparently anyone considering dropping one of those heavy-breathing Rover V8s into a Montego engine bay are charged heavily and told to 'GTF boyo' if asking for cheap rates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Eyersey1234 said:

Why is the road tax cheaper on the 1.3?  

Pre-2001 cars the road tax was done on engine size and there were two bands. A low one for engines below 1549cc (£170pa) and a high one for about 1549cc (£280pa). Obviously this engine swap switches the capacity and reclassifies the tax band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn’t there also a company car tax thing going on at the time? Which favoured smaller engined cars.

I’ve read somewhere that Volvo sold significantly more 2.0 700 series cars at that time because of this, the only marginally bigger 2.3 engines were in a higher bracket so were a bit less popular for fleet buyers.

 

Cracking car btw, great to see it saved! For one of these the rust doesn’t look too bad at all, especially considering the outstanding mileage on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Tommyboy12 said:

Pre-2001 cars the road tax was done on engine size and there were two bands. A low one for engines below 1549cc (£170pa) and a high one for about 1549cc (£280pa). Obviously this engine swap switches the capacity and reclassifies the tax band.

Thanks I had forgotten it was done on engine size

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, danthecapriman said:

Wasn’t there also a company car tax thing going on at the time? Which favoured smaller engined cars.

I’ve read somewhere that Volvo sold significantly more 2.0 700 series cars at that time because of this, the only marginally bigger 2.3 engines were in a higher bracket so were a bit less popular for fleet buyers.

 

Cracking car btw, great to see it saved! For one of these the rust doesn’t look too bad at all, especially considering the outstanding mileage on it.

2.0 litres was a line for benefit in kind, allowed mileage and tax values of company cars for many years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I truly felt the joy when taking a 'nosebleed inducing' dive - from 1.6 to 1.0 - and pocketing the £110 saving :)

*no sleepless night over the new E10 u/l too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tommyboy12 said:

Gearbox wise my understanding is they are the same between the 1.3 and 1.6 but the 1.6 had 5 speeds were as that was optional on the 1.3.

Gearbox was dependent on trim level rather than engine size.  4 speed on base models, 5 speed on everything else, but the 5 speed was an optional extra on both 1.3 and 1.6 base.

2021-07-29_10-58-43.thumb.jpg.fd212cc86f09a9768951a452c5806b59.jpg

July 1987 brochure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Tommyboy12 changed the title to Austin Montego Estate - Occasional appearance of the rest of the fleet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Fumbler
      To mark the genesis of my fleet project thread I here present my new car: a 1997 Nissan Micra Shape-


      It really looks that good. There is a reason for this: its previous owner was an old lady who loved the thing so much so she made every effort to keep it in good shape. It originally came from Fleet in the GU postcode which suggests to me it was bought by the present dealer at auction, hence arriving down here in Kent. Before seeing the car I checked its MOT history and its only fails were thanks to broken stoplights, which shows me that it was very well cared for. I suppose an example of this was that on the last MOT, an advisory was a corroded rear silencer. The silencer on the car when I saw it was new. Methinks the lady wanted to keep it as good as possible. It was kept in a garage and so all the bumpers and black trim are very black and the tyres are in very good condition. Spare never used! Also included a free Dettol first aid kit from 1997.
      This car has 15000 genuine miles on the clock. We clocked over 15000 during the test drive! The lady owner really only trundled around her village in it and the MOT shows that it only did some meagre miles between tests. This, of course, came at a price. We saw a cherry red Micra from 2002 at the same dealer. Paint was shoddy and when they washed it the boot had massive sections of bare metal and it wasn't very happy. This car, however, is in fabulous condition and there was no contest between the two cars- it really is that good, inside and out. Immaculate interior, driver's airbag, cassette player... all there and all functioning (apart from cassette thanks to new battery and failed display). This meant that I bought it for £1600, £100 over what was my uppermost limit, but I knew I wouldn't see another like this that was in as good shape for a fair while. It was priced very ambitiously, at £1990, so I'm content in the fact I managed to slash a few hundred off the price. There wasn't that much paperwork though. All the dealership received was the logbook with 3 service stamps from 1998, 1999 and 2000, the radio key pass, a National Trust sticker, and the original paperwork holder. I suspect the old lady died and had her car auctioned, and the massive file of paperwork is now someone's egg carton, along will everything else she owned.

      As always, this car isn't exactly in showroom condition. While the inside is great and the floor is solid, and the underseal is in great shape, the not undersealed parts need a small looking at. Mainly the rear of the driver's side sill. It's really the only bubbling on the car. I suspect a well aimed stonechip managed to fester over the wintery salted roads, making it rust even more. It's around the size of a 5p piece, and will give me the opportunity to spray the insides of the sill with some chain oil to prevent any further corrosion. Behind the fuel tank there are a few rusty joints- places where the spraygun cannot get paint onto- which some Vactan and Dynax should put to rights. Alternator belt looks original because of the cracking and Nissan badges and will need doing soon as well as the front plate. As much as I like the 90's font and original dealer surround, the dishevelled R and general water ingress is a persistant MOT advisory. It could be the MOT station being strict (and most likely is considering there's a Saxo down the road with far worse blackening), however for the sake of peace of mind and all that, I'll get a new one made. The rear has already been replaced indicating this has happened before.
      All in all, I think this is a nice plucky motor. I'll have it by the end of the week; just got to sort out tax, insurance, and it's going to have an MOT. As part of the deal it's getting the MOT and an oil and filter change which will be something ticked off the list. It has some love scratches and chips here and there, but it drives well, is stiff and controllable, and should make out to be a nice summer project!
    • By BorniteIdentity
      This week, for the first time ever, I felt old. I have sciatica which swaps from one side to the other, arthritis in one hand and what I think is the beginnings of IBS. On top of that it took me 2 weeks to remember a registration number that once would take me 2 seconds, and I forgot my parent's wedding anniversary.

      I'm only 32.

      Shit. No I'm not. I'm 33. I forgot that too. (Genuinely)

      So, it's about time I committed some of my tales to paper. Well, a shonky server... but that's the best you can do in 2016.

      First up, a list of the cars I've owned (as best as I can remember) in chronological order.

      Main Cars
      1985 VW Polo Formel E. C158 TRT. This was given to me even before I passed my test.

      1991 Rover Metro S. J801 TAC. Bought about 3 months after I passed my test as I was convinced the Polo was about to shit its gearbox.

      1987 Volvo 360 GLT. D899 CBJ ___ Managed three months in a Metro before the small car and smaller petrol tank became a bore.



      Ford Mondeo and Honda Civic Coupe by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1999 Ford Mondeo Zetec. V384 DBJ. Still the most I've ever spent on a car. It was 3 years old and cost, from memory, about £8,000. Just think of the Rover R8s you could buy with that now!

      1987 Volkswagen Golf GTI 8v by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1987 Volkswagen Golf GTI D79 CVV. I very nearly bought a MK1 Golf 1.1 but was persuaded, by my father amusingly, to buy this one from a different friend. From memory I gave about £500 for it, and sold it to some racers later that year for about £300. Amusingly, 16 year later I'd sell the Hartge wheels that came with the car for £530.

      1999 Toyota Avensis CDX by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1999 Toyota Avensis CDX. V781 GDP. By far the best car I've ever had. Bought in 2002 for £5300, it had previously been a company car at British Telecom. I ran it from 62,000 to 174,000 before it became surplus to requirements. A German chap bought it on ebay for about £500 and drove over to collect it. Hero.

      2001 Ford Mondeo Zetec by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      2001 Ford Mondeo Zetec. Y821 EEB. I should have loved this car. I gave £500 for it in 2008 which was stupidly cheap by anybody's standards. It needed 4 tyres (which actually was nice to pick good ones for once) and a coil spring. Sadly, it was just bill after bill after bill. I sold it and promised to never own another Ford. I nearly succeeded.

      1998 Nissan Almera by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1998 Nissan Almera GX Auto. S58 NLO. My late Grandfather's car and, upon reflection, my first proper attempt at bangernomics. I bought it for £500 in 2008 from the estate and ran it for well over a year and 30,000 miles. It was also my first automatic which, whilst a bit dumb, did lock up into overdrive and give a good 36 mpg no matter how it was driven.

      2004 Ford Fiesta 1.25 LX and 2006 Ford Focus 2.0 Ghia by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      2004 Ford Fiesta Zetec. AG53 BWL. My wife's car which I ran for a couple of years when I bought her a Focus as a wedding gift.

      2003 Rover 75 by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      2003 Rover 75 Club SE. AX53 BFA. This is where my career as a serial car buyer really began. Ignoring all of the warning signs I decided to press a K Series into a daily 100 mile commute, which it did with aplomb. This wasn't actually the car I set out to buy, the one I'd agreed to buy OVERHEATED ON THE FORECOURT whilst I was doing the paperwork. Consequently I couldn't leave fast enough and bought a different car later that day.

      2004 Toyota Avensis T30-X by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      2004 Toyota Avensis T3-X. KT53 DWZ. Sensible head back on, I decided to get back into something I trusted when my 3rd son was born. This was a lovely car, but not without its problems. The VVTi oil burning issues are well documented and do frequently occur. Ironically, this was less reliable than the Rover it replaced! Despite fearing the worst and 3 months off the road, the new owner has just MOTd it.

      1999 Toyota Avensis SR by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1999 Toyota Avensis SR. V263 GDP. Back into bangernomics territory again. The last MK1 Avensis I had was the best car I'd ever had, so I hoped to replicate it with another T22 Avensis. This one came up for sale in my favourite (and rare) colour with a numberplate sequential to my previous car - so it was meant to be. I still have this now, and tomorrow it will tick around to 185,000 miles having been bought by me at 100,500.

      Side Bitches

      1974 Morris Mini 1000 by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1974 Morris Mini 1000. GEL 517N. Well, I always wanted one - and was young, free, single and well off at the time (2003). A memorable trip to buy it when I called my new girlfriend by my ex girlfriend's name 20 miles into a 200 mile weekend away. She's never forgiven or forgotten but we're still friends. Oh - and married.

      1977 Ford Capri II GL by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1977 Ford Capri II 1600 GL. SMY 675R. I can't remember why I bought this, other than I thought it'd be amusing. It was bought from Norwich for £350 and was perfectly well behaved for the 8 months that I had it (other than a flasher unit expiring). I remember being shocked just how much the windscreen would ice up inside, and duly sold it in November to a guy who was going to drive it daily! It's still alive and now, apparently, black! (Update - it's now silver!!!)

      1989 Volvo 340 DL by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1989 Volvo 340 DL. G67 AVN. I bought this for £80. Unbelievable. It was utterly bloody perfect. I wanted to do a banger rally which is why the guy gave it to me so cheap. I'm still yet to do that rally, but no longer have the car. I sold it for about £300 to a family who were clearly down on their luck who, I hope, still have the car.

      1996 Toyota Granvia by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1996 Toyota Granvia. N775 JEV. My wife and I decided to increase our numbers further and, with our 4th son on the way, larger transport was required. We quickly realised you can either have 4 children and no apparel, or apparel and no children. After trying a very tired Mercedes Viano, the Granvia was found for 1/4 of the price and it's still here 2 years later. I can safely say that we'll never sell it - it really is another member of the family.

      1993 Mercedes 190e by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1993 Mercedes 190e. L795 COJ. I've admired these cars since I was a child. In fact, one of the very few toy cars I still have from my childhood is a Mercedes 190e. Regular readers of "Memoirs from the Hard Shoulder" will know what a PITA this car has been since day 1, but I get the feeling it's a keeper. We'll see!

      1983 Ford Sierra Base 1.6 by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1983 Ford Sierra Base. GVG 510Y. Not explicitly my car, but it should be documented here for reference. Oh - and the V5 is in my name. The story is online for all to read as to how five of us acquired what is believed to be the only remaining Ford Sierra Base. Make a brew and read it, it's a fantastic story.

      1982 Ford Sierra L by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1982 Ford Sierra L. LCR 503Y. I accidentally won this on ebay for £520. Upon reflection, I shouldn't have sold it - but short stop of saying I regret it. I could never get truly comfortable driving it and, in fairness, I could scratch my Sierra itch with the base if I wanted. Sold it at a stupid profit of £1250. It is believed to be the oldest remaining Ford Sierra in the UK.

      1979 Volvo 343 DL by Bornite Identity, on Flickr
      1979 Volvo 343 DL. DBY 466T As you'll see above, I'd had a 360GLT as a younger lad and fancied one of these earlier cars. The variomatic is, frankly, terrible but amusing. This car has just 8000 miles on the clock and inside was absolutely timewarp. Sadly, the huge bill for the Mercedes 190e cylinder head rebuild meant I had to sell this car shortly after acquiring it. Since then I've had a bit of money luck, and now realise I didn't need to sell it after all. Typical.

      I think that's it. My arthritis is playing up even more now. I've left out a few cars that were actually my wife's, but if I find pictures will add them in at a later date. I'll run this as an ongoing thread on cars and what's happening.

      Current SitRep:

      Purple Avensis: Just about to click over 185,000. Minor drama this week when an HT lead split but otherwise utterly fantastic, fantastically boring and boringly reliable.

      Granvia: Just done 1000 miles in a month around Norfolk, 6 up with suitcases. 31mpg achieved on the way up which is good for an old tub with a 3.0 Turbo Diesel on board. ODO displaying 175,000 which is a mix of miles and kilometers. Say 130,000 miles for argument's sake.

      Mercedes: Being a PITA. It's had the top end completely rebuilt after the chain came off. Now needs welding to pass another MOT and the gearbox bearings are on strike. It's about to go into the garage for winter until I can stomach it again. 151,000 miles on the clock.

      Sierra bASe: Still on sabbatical with AngryDicky who only took it bloody camping in cornwall! Legend.
    • By Peter C
      I bought a lovely Mini Cooper S from @Sunny Jim which my wife and I collected yesterday. See here:
      The Cooper made the 250 mile 4.5 hour journey to Buckinghamshire (from North Wales!) under its own steam but all was not well under the bonnet. The fresh air vents were providing anything but fresh air, I was choking on oily fumes. I stopped on route and wiped a lot of oil from the rocker cover and gently kept going, keeping the engine revs below 3k.
      Before you read any further, I have absolutely no qualms about the car or the deal I made with @Sunny Jim I bought an 18 year old car with 120k, sold as seen, of course there will be problems! 
      I investigated further this morning. There was oil all over the front of the engine and on top of the exhaust manifold shield.


      I went to remove plug lead No 2 and it came off in two pieces, the metal connector has split from the cable.

      Next I removed the sparkplugs. Plugs 1 and 4 were a little moist but plugs 2 and 3 were sinking in engine oil.


      The rocker cover gasket and plug well seals were obviously knackered, a typical R50/53 fault. 
      To get the rocket cover off...

      All this had to be removed. It's by no means a difficult job but it was time consuming. There is a bit more space under the bonnet of my W123 & W124!

      I've bought a new set of leads £18 and I'm picking up the gasket set tomorrow morning (£40). Hopefully the whole lot will go back together without any issues.
      Look at this engine, it's hard to believe that it's done 120k miles in 18 years. Everything under the rocker cover looks mint!

      In other news, to replace a blown brake light bulb I had to remove the entire light unit. How stupid. Modern* cars ehh?

      The annoying rattle from the tailgate was silenced with a 4 inch length of insulation tape, wrapped around the lock catch.

      I do like a clean exhaust pipe. Or two. Out came the Brasso and I am pleased with the shine.

      And finally, I've noticed that the small lights in the front bumper flick on randomly. According to the experts on a Facebook group, the presence of LED bulbs is upsetting the system.

    • By dome
      This evening I venture forth into hitherto unknown lands (Kirkintilloch) to collect my latest acquisition.

      Which, naturally, has issues.

      I have purchased my first line of defence.



      Which appears to have antigravity properties

      More will follow this evening...
    • By Zelandeth
      Well I've been meaning to sign up here in forever, but kept forgetting. Thanks to someone over on another forum I frequent poking me about it recently the subject was forced back into my very brief attention span for long enough to get me to act on the instruction.

      I figure that my little varied fleet might bring you lot some amusement...

      So...we've got:

      1993 Lada Riva 1.5E Estate (now fuel injected, as I reckon the later cars should have been from the factory...).
      1989 Saab 900i Automatic.
      1987 Skoda 120LX 21st Anniversary Special Edition.
      1985 Sinclair C5.
      2009 Peugeot 107 Verve.

      Now getting the photos together has taken me far longer than I'd expected...so you're gonna get a couple of photos of each car for now, and I'll come back with some more information tomorrow when I've got a bit more time...

      Firstly...The Lada. Before anyone asks - in response to the single question I get asked about this car: No, it is not for sale. Took me 13 years and my father's inheritance to find the thing.


      Yes, it's got the usual rusty wings...Hoping that will be resolved in the next couple of months.

       






      Next, a proper old Saab. One of the very last 8 valve cars apparently, and all the better for it. I've driven two 16v autos and they were horrible - the auto box works sooooo much better with the torque curve of the 8 valve engine. Just wish it had an overdrive for motorway cruising...









      Next up a *real* Skoda...back when they put the engine where it belongs, right out the back. In the best possible colour of course...eye-searingly bright orange.







      Seat covers have been added since that photo was taken as it suffers from the usual rotting seat cloth problem that affects virtually all Estelles.

      Then we have possibly the world's scruffiest Sinclair C5...



      Realised when looking for this that I really need to get some more photos of the thing...I use it often enough after all! We have a dog who's half husky, so this is a really good way of getting him some exercise.

      Finally - again, I really need to take more photos of - we have the little Pug 107.



      Included for the sake of variety even if it's a bit mainstream! First (and probably to be the only) new car I've bought, and has been a cracking little motor and has asked for very little in return for putting up with nearly three years of Oxford-Milton Keynes commuter traffic, before finally escaping that fate when my housemate moved to a new job. Now it doesn't do many miles and is my default car for "when I've managed to break everything else."

      I'll fill in some more details tomorrow - I warn you though that I do tend to ramble...
×
×
  • Create New...