Jump to content

The grumpy thread


outlaw118

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Zelandeth said:

It was definitely secure prior to last week as it was something I checked when I was under there a few weeks ago when the tracking was being done.

If it was flapping about like that I'd be very surprised if I hadn't heard it or detected vibration from it...

I think the same every time I see it TBH, but then remembering the average IQ of a modern car driver it's not surprising... The fact that it's you makes me sugest it probably did just go instantly as you're usually shit hot on that sort of thing

Is there any of it left? IE can you see where it's ripped off the fixings leaving bits of plastic and bolts in tact? If it's a clean break then I'd go with the bloody garage not doing it properly. It's a good 15 minute each way job on my car to get it on and off so I could see them skimping on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key card for the Laguna has been a bit useless for the last week or so, which I filed away in the 'I need to do something about that soon' part of my brain. Went to use it today and its completely dead, to the extent I had to bust out the emergency blade for the first time. Fine, off to the supermarket for a battery. 

Get back to the car, and notice the 'this battery is baby proof' sticker. Which seems to mean that its now completely encased in plastic, and you can't just peel off the card backing. Great if you have scissors, less so in sainsburys car park. Fine, I'll use my teeth. 

*starts attacking surprisingly robust packaging*

Hmm, I wonder what that other sticker say-OHJESUSCHRISTFUCKFUCKWHATISTHAT?

20220427_202548.thumb.jpg.0e260aa78ea7df0e78926b5a16448753.jpg

According to Duracell that is Bitrex, 'the bitterest substance in the world'. Yay. I had* to go and buy a multi pack of Mars bars to try and counter the taste. 

Given that this is the access to the battery that's now in the key card:

20220427_204500.thumb.jpg.9f79309b1c4195c5cce5ba9d04b780ab.jpg

Please feel free to quote this post when I come back to this thread in 12 months having tried to remove the now dead battery with my teeth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 these parking machines have appeared in widnes adjacent to morrisons ,I took this picture last week, they're working today , only pensioners were really confused by them , the keyboard is at waist height instead of eyeline and the letters are not much different in colour to the background keys 

 

Its designed to catch you out , put a wrong digit in and it's a £100 fine instead of £1 , what's wrong with black keys on a silver background.

20220413_082056.thumb.jpg.ecd0f4571a366f5caaa9c546af59adf5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Not only that, it doesn't help the 'cost of living' in any meaningful way.  The price of an MOT is fixed at about £55.  Any additional cost is due to an MOT failure - so what the government are in fact saying here is that they're happy for cars that would otherwise fail an MOT to be on the road.


If it's appropriate to associate 'strategy' or indeed 'thinking' with the policy makers, I'm guessing with a biannual test and two years for advisories to turn into reasons for failure, they expect a rise in MOT failures with a verdict of 'uneconomic to repair' and yay! another modern can be cubed, and another driver is pushed towards the PCP market because they need a car and sharpish.

As for the obviously longer periods that a vehicle may be unroadworthy, fuck it, we're only the plebs that drive or get hit by the deathtraps. The policy makers will be safe on their yachts.

#commierant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chodweaver said:


 

 


If it's appropriate to associate 'strategy' or indeed 'thinking' with the policy makers, I'm guessing with a biannual test and two years for advisories to turn into reasons for failure, they expect a rise in MOT failures with a verdict of 'uneconomic to repair' and yay! another modern can be cubed, and another driver is pushed towards the PCP market because they need a car and sharpish.

As for the obviously longer periods that a vehicle may be unroadworthy, fuck it, we're only the plebs that drive or get hit by the deathtraps. The policy makers will be safe on their yachts.

#commierant

 

More dodgy cars on the road won’t go down well with the insurance industry. Up go premiums by at least twice what you’ve saved on the MOT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Wack said:

 these parking machines have appeared in widnes adjacent to morrisons ,I took this picture last week, they're working today , only pensioners were really confused by them , the keyboard is at waist height instead of eyeline and the letters are not much different in colour to the background keys 

 

Its designed to catch you out , put a wrong digit in and it's a £100 fine instead of £1 , what's wrong with black keys on a silver background.

20220413_082056.thumb.jpg.ecd0f4571a366f5caaa9c546af59adf5.jpg

Is the keyboard in ABCD layout rather than Qwerty too? The ones in Thame are like that and it always pisses me off whenever I use them. Someone had the choice to do it normally but decided to make it different just to be twats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, chodweaver said:


 

 


If it's appropriate to associate 'strategy' or indeed 'thinking' with the policy makers, I'm guessing with a biannual test and two years for advisories to turn into reasons for failure, they expect a rise in MOT failures with a verdict of 'uneconomic to repair' and yay! another modern can be cubed, and another driver is pushed towards the PCP market because they need a car and sharpish.

As for the obviously longer periods that a vehicle may be unroadworthy, fuck it, we're only the plebs that drive or get hit by the deathtraps. The policy makers will be safe on their yachts.

#commierant

 

The Tüv in Germany is two years without mayhem ensuing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, artdjones said:

The Tüv in Germany is two years without mayhem ensuing.

What we have Similar to MOT and TUV in Norway are 2 years also. And works just fine and read a while ago that very few of the accidents here are caused by faults on cars. Having to take the car to MOT every year would be very annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our local green environmental group seems to have got the town council to make 98% of roads in my rural town 20mph. Gr9... 

I can see the argument for maybe 40% of the roads but nope, the entire town and surrounding areas. My opinion of maybe they should repaint all the fucked white lines on the road and clean and uncover the road signage that gets buried in overgrowth, and cut back the verges and junctions that grow tall every year 'so the bees have somewhere to go' would probably see more of an improvement in road safety got gaslit down by the electric car brigade. 

I'll be in 2nd gear at 20 then, maybe even dropping to 1st if I'm in a particularly pissed off mood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, beko1987 said:

Our local green environmental group seems to have got the town council to make 98% of roads in my rural town 20mph. Gr9... 

I can see the argument for maybe 40% of the roads but nope, the entire town and surrounding areas. My opinion of maybe they should repaint all the fucked white lines on the road and clean and uncover the road signage that gets buried in overgrowth, and cut back the verges and junctions that grow tall every year 'so the bees have somewhere to go' would probably see more of an improvement in road safety got gaslit down by the electric car brigade. 

I'll be in 2nd gear at 20 then, maybe even dropping to 1st if I'm in a particularly pissed off mood. 

Brighton is a nightmare and sounds just as bad, you've got roads like they have in America coming off the A23-A27 heading towards town and they're all 20mph too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, RoverFolkUs said:

Biannual MOTs...

What an utterly fucking ridiculous idea

I see plenty of cars coming in as absolute deathtraps after just one year

"will ease the cost of living"

How? The advisories system would have to be far more stringent when the problem is likely to be ignored for 2 years instead of 1... 

I maybe in favour of an MOT after 3 years, then biannually from thereonwards until the car reaches X number of years old then back to annual tests. 

They toyed the idea of increasing first tests to 4 years, that idea soon fizzled out

Crazy idea this. If you can’t afford £40 for the test get off the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, angle said:

I'll use my teeth.

 

12 hours ago, angle said:

Bitrex

It's people like you why warnings ⚠️ like this exist😄😄😄

On a serious note, why is the warning hidden behind where the battery would be and not on the front of the packaging.

They are a proper bastard to get in though and bloody expensive. My slk takes two of the bastards per fob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here in Ireland the first roadworthyness test is done at four years old,then every two years until the car is ten years old.Then it's tested every year.

If a car is lucky enough to survive to thirty years old then the test becomes every two years again,when the car reaches its fortieth it's exempt from test.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, junkyarddog said:

Here in Ireland the first roadworthyness test is done at four years old,then every two years until the car is ten years old.Then it's tested every year.

If a car is lucky enough to survive to thirty years old then the test becomes every two years again,when the car reaches its fortieth it's exempt from test.

 

I don’t know about Ireland but in the U.K. there’s loads of cars knocking about 2-3 years old on bald tyres. There’s no excuse in my opinion, if you haven’t got the money to run the car legally then you need taking off the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dyslexic Viking said:

What we have Similar to MOT and TUV in Norway are 2 years also. And works just fine and read a while ago that very few of the accidents here are caused by faults on cars. Having to take the car to MOT every year would be very annoying.

I suspect the average Norwegian or German might have a different perception of car maintenance than the average Brit though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have bi-annual tests in Slovakia as well, and to be fair even in the rural places in the East that I've stayed you don't tend to see motors that are properly hanging in daily use anymore, it's mostly a sea of moderns out there. I'm not sure where you could gather data from, but it would be interesting to see figures on collisions due to mechanical failure in the countries that do have bi-annual test versus annual test, and also would be interesting to see the average mileage covered annually in those countries, plus the average age of car. Maybe even data for inspection failure rates too if you're going all out. You'd hope that some kind of exercise along those lines is guiding the govt decision...

I don't think there's a perfect solution really, as pointed out above it's perfectly achievable to make a new car un-roadworthy within the 3 year initial grace period so our system already has gaps. Testing standards are another point to consider - I've previously imported cars from Japan that were being sold having failed the test there, which then passed an MOT here once landed after having a fog lamp chucked on. Perhaps the 2 year tests are more stringent than the annual tests?

From a purely selfish point of view I wouldn't mind a 2 year test and keep the extra multiples of £50 a year in the beer fund, but it's unusual for me to do more than 1500 miles a year in any one car bar the Insight so a system that suits me probably isn't going to be reflective of the average car user...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many nuns and kittens died due to the extended MOT grace period during COVID? 

My feeling is those who look after their cars will continue to do so, and those who don’t won’t. I know plenty of folk who will skim around on balder tyres, but more who will continue to correctly maintain. More of interest - to me - is whether the great unwashed will now adopt a bi-annual service scheme too, as lots do a service and test at the same time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sierraman said:

The point is that we should be making life more difficult for people who won’t reach the minimum standards, the way of enforcing that is ensuring an annual check.

<two pence>

I agree. The amount of absolutely hinging cars gives me the fear. Certainly no 'nuns or kittens' were injured, but how long does it have to be before someone is because some mechanical sadist fuckwit is driving around in some shed that's bordering on lethal. As yon thread about the police complaint highlighted, it's less likely for the police to tend to these things as it once was.

If you're choosing not to keep a car meeting the bare minimum of roadworthiness then don't participate. Simples. :)

</two pence>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to be devil's advocate;

If it's just about making life harder for those who don't maintain their cars, why not a 6 month test? It would only be an extra £50 a year per car for those who look after their motors, and the knackered motors would potentially be removed from the roads several months earlier than under the current system.

Completely agree that not keeping your vehicle roadworthy is not acceptable if you are going to use it on the road, but the timescales and what contemplates roadworthy appears to be somewhat arbitrary depending on each individual country so how do you know what's the best fit without looking at solid data in order to determine what actually supports a level of safety which we have determined is acceptable for our own society? If the data suggests that our car usage matches those of countries with 2 year tests and they have no worse failure/accident rates than us then you'd expect it would be ok to move the test date out without any real consequence in safety assuming usage doesn't alter. If our usage is greater and we already have higher failure or accident rates then you'd expect us to keep annual tests or maybe even consider shorter test periods if it's apparent that there must be a large number of cars out there that aren't roadworthy and are a contributor to road deaths or injuries.

TBH I think they should keep it to an annual test just because that's what we're used to and it presumably works (if it ain't broke etc. etc.), but if the government move it having done due diligence (don't laugh!) then it wouldn't make me more worried to be out on the road with a 2 year test system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rust Collector said:

Just to be devil's advocate;

If it's just about making life harder for those who don't maintain their cars, why not a 6 month test? It would only be an extra £50 a year per car for those who look after their motors, and the knackered motors would potentially be removed from the roads several months earlier than under the current system.

Completely agree that not keeping your vehicle roadworthy is not acceptable if you are going to use it on the road, but the timescales and what contemplates roadworthy appears to be somewhat arbitrary depending on each individual country so how do you know what's the best fit without looking at solid data in order to determine what actually supports a level of safety which we have determined is acceptable for our own society? If the data suggests that our car usage matches those of countries with 2 year tests and they have no worse failure/accident rates than us then you'd expect it would be ok to move the test date out without any real consequence in safety assuming usage doesn't alter. If our usage is greater and we already have higher failure or accident rates then you'd expect us to keep annual tests or maybe even consider shorter test periods if it's apparent that there must be a large number of cars out there that aren't roadworthy and are a contributor to road deaths or injuries.

TBH I think they should keep it to an annual test just because that's what we're used to and it presumably works (if it ain't broke etc. etc.), but if the government move it having done due diligence (don't laugh!) then it wouldn't make me more worried to be out on the road with a 2 year test system.

Don’t think the infrastructure could cope with a test every 6 months 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say I don't get the historic MOT exemption idea.

It places too much risk on the owner of the car. And people don't maintain things.

My mate Dan used to drive a Beetle with a great big hole in the floorpan. We'd go on 100 mile outings, and you could see the M40 rushing underneath your feet. A hole nearly big enough to put your foot into.

I bet there's loads of cars like that, or perhaps worse cars "repaired" with a sheet of steel and a gob of filler.

Rules are good for stuff like this. They give vehicle owners a standard that they must adhere to in order to satisfy the law. At the moment, the onus is on them to decide what's legal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BorniteIdentity said:

How many nuns and kittens died due to the extended MOT grace period during COVID? 

My feeling is those who look after their cars will continue to do so, and those who don’t won’t. I know plenty of folk who will skim around on balder tyres, but more who will continue to correctly maintain. More of interest - to me - is whether the great unwashed will now adopt a bi-annual service scheme too, as lots do a service and test at the same time. 

This, pretty much. The bare minimum drivers will still be bare minimum while those who like cars and driving will continue to drive well-maintained and/or safe cars. I don't think that much would really change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chris667 said:

I have to say I don't get the historic MOT exemption idea.

It places too much risk on the owner of the car. And people don't maintain things.

My mate Dan used to drive a Beetle with a great big hole in the floorpan. We'd go on 100 mile outings, and you could see the M40 rushing underneath your feet. A hole nearly big enough to put your foot into.

I bet there's loads of cars like that, or perhaps worse cars "repaired" with a sheet of steel and a gob of filler.

Rules are good for stuff like this. They give vehicle owners a standard that they must adhere to in order to satisfy the law. At the moment, the onus is on them to decide what's legal.

There’s always been the misapprehension that all classic car owners are competent and keep their vehicle in top notch condition. Some it has to be said shouldn’t be anywhere near the tools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, horriblemercedes said:

This, pretty much. The bare minimum drivers will still be bare minimum while those who like cars and driving will continue to drive well-maintained and/or safe cars. I don't think that much would really change

But surely we should be doing more to heavily penalise the ‘bare minimum’ folks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sierraman said:

But surely we should be doing more to heavily penalise the ‘bare minimum’ folks?

I agree with you, but MOTs don't really do that in my opinion. Scraping pass after pass is barely a deterrent and even (in my opinion) might encourage people just to find completely bent MOT testers to pass their shitbox Fiesta for £50.

 

I would be happy to see it stay as a yearly test, but I don't think that it would make much difference were it to go to every other year. I'd welcome it for myself, but I'm confident that my cars are well-maintained so means that there's a bit less hassle for me organising and paying for tests. It's a long time since I had a car fail a test though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...