Jump to content

eBay tat volume 3.


Ross_K

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Skizzer said:

No MOT though, and I’m not convinced its exempt, being modified.

Is that right? I thought it was only based on the age, how would dvla decide how much modification was too much to be exempt if the registration remains the same?

Edit: apologies, you're right, there's a whole 'substantial changes' clause that applies for engine swaps etc. However, "alternative cubic capacities of the same basic engine and alternative original equipment engines are not considered to be a substantial change"

is the later 3.0 the same basic engine?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they did a 2.8 CIH. They did 2.0, 2.2 and 2.4 four cylinders but I think the six was always 3 litres. I think the blocks are broadly similar - there was a fella in the North West doing a 16v head for a Manta by cutting down a 24v head. That was maybe twenty years ago now and I don't know if he ever finished it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sir Snipes said:

I don't think they did a 2.8 CIH. They did 2.0, 2.2 and 2.4 four cylinders but I think the six was always 3 litres. I think the blocks are broadly similar - there was a fella in the North West doing a 16v head for a Manta by cutting down a 24v head. That was maybe twenty years ago now and I don't know if he ever finished it. 

The 2.8 CIH was the carb option for Senators and Royales in saloon or Coupe flavour. I think ,in the U.K. anyway, Monzas we’re always 3.0 Injections. There was also a 2.5 CIH found in carb form in Commodores and Viceroys and later in injection form in Senators . Presumably the 2.6 in Carltons and later Senators was also the CIH .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, NorfolkNWeigh said:

The 2.8 CIH was the carb option for Senators and Royales in saloon or Coupe flavour. I think ,in the U.K. anyway, Monzas we’re always 3.0 Injections. There was also a 2.5 CIH found in carb form in Commodores and Viceroys and later in injection form in Senators . Presumably the 2.6 in Carltons and later Senators was also the CIH .

Wow I either didn't know or had forgotten how many variants of the CIH they did back then! Let's list them;

1.3, 1.6, 1.9, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 (4-pots)

2.5, 2.6, 2.8, 3.0 (6 cyl)

Can we count the Lotus as a very heavily revised/distant relative? How about the Manta 400 16v? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sir Snipes said:

Wow I either didn't know or had forgotten how many variants of the CIH they did back then! Let's list them;

1.3, 1.6, 1.9, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 (4-pots)

2.5, 2.6, 2.8, 3.0 (6 cyl)

Can we count the Lotus as a very heavily revised/distant relative? How about the Manta 400 16v? 

Yes the 3.6 is a stretched 24v CIH , also I think some Bitters had a 4.0 version . There were a couple of 4.0 Senator 24v s for sale recently on eBay or C&C, presumably these were the same lumps Bitter used rather than some ancient South African or Australian 1950’s Chevrolet pickup truck engine like in their Senator A’s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Skizzer said:

It’s even properly logged as a 3.0 with the DVLA. No MOT though, and I’m not convinced its exempt, being modified.

Further checking with DVLA suggests that 24v Royale Coupe is still MOT exempt:

Quote

The following changes are not considered substantial:

  • Engine - alternative cubic capacities of the same basic engine and alternative original equipment engines

So as the 3.0 Carlton GSI replacement engine is substantially the same block as the original 2.8 (as well as the 3.0 that was later a factory option on the Royale), all is good for MOT exemption.   

And yes there was a 2.8 CIH, I've got one parked outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another obscure FoMoCo barge -  Mercury malaise-era Monarch!   

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.0c9c78add72fcd990d37aa87a2ff0298.jpg

Right Hand Drive, so LHD-o-phobes will have to think of different excuses.

696373760_Screenshot2020-06-21at10_56_41.thumb.png.f45520c5339dd977cee39d2e068f3758.png

1407027793_Screenshot2020-06-21at10_54_13.png.cd27138f83cab5f7d9e5360570512af8.png

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1977-Mercury-Monarch-Ghia-V8-302cu-auto/264769169821?hash=item3da578e99d:g:kHkAAOSwmsxe5LDn

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

19 minutes ago, Asimo said:

Another obscure FoMoCo barge -  Mercury malaise-era Monarch!   

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.0c9c78add72fcd990d37aa87a2ff0298.jpg

Right Hand Drive, so LHD-o-phobes will have to think of different excuses.

696373760_Screenshot2020-06-21at10_56_41.thumb.png.f45520c5339dd977cee39d2e068f3758.png

1407027793_Screenshot2020-06-21at10_54_13.png.cd27138f83cab5f7d9e5360570512af8.png

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1977-Mercury-Monarch-Ghia-V8-302cu-auto/264769169821?hash=item3da578e99d:g:kHkAAOSwmsxe5LDn

 

 

 

I hadn’t noticed before, but the glasshouse on those has a distinct Mk2 Granada look to it:

71BFA271-59B7-4EF8-8272-61E8060B6D89.thumb.jpeg.636c52fe39544f8f97980daec1c977ff.jpeg

EC5656F9-C943-4A72-B463-54A4F4F4EE42.thumb.jpeg.10504ae24ab4982d18fde3a8a25a1b29.jpeg

I assume there are no interchangeable parts though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Skizzer said:


 

I hadn’t noticed before, but the glasshouse on those has a distinct Mk2 Granada look to it:

71BFA271-59B7-4EF8-8272-61E8060B6D89.thumb.jpeg.636c52fe39544f8f97980daec1c977ff.jpeg

F4F9E73F-5A34-4886-A46C-5CCAD786824A.thumb.jpeg.c1addd2f8a30207b3289b485381d5863.jpeg

I assume there are no interchangeable parts though.

 

I think that shape Monarch/ US Granada predates the Mk2 Granny by a couple of years, they were going for a Euro look though , as can be seen by the ads of the time. I remember the Mark2 being compared to the W126 and W123 by the press at launch too.

3565B027-B8D7-40EC-804A-C48F0C4B035A.thumb.jpeg.27b6cffcf9b95098f7e631602fdb92b4.jpeg57E3249F-18FA-4030-979F-775D021771E7.thumb.jpeg.1ec7252eaf43b0fd19c0f82656b4a860.jpeg

Personally I think both you and the copywriters would benefit from a drive in a Disco Sport, to Barnard Castle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...