brownnova Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Looks a bit Daimler SP250 ish to me... Maybe a modified coupe? But it does look awful small! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownnova Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 In fact this is a Daimler and looks similar... ... But it was discounted on another forum (where I found the image) think this one had stumped petrol heads all over the interweb! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skut Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Based on how tiny the wheelbase looks and how low it is, my guess would be someone has gone to great effort to modify a Berkeley. The drivers seating in relation to the rear wheels looks about right. The bonnet line just looks very low to have a sidevalve munter in there.(Probably all wrong) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HillmanImp Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 If the rest of the t'interweb AND Barrett don't know I fear we never will. I am afraid its time to give up and go back to posting pictures of our lunch on Facebook. Junkman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skut Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 Had a go at drawing the Harrington Munter. Couldn't be bothered to add wipers as would have taken a lot of effort to get right and probably still looked wank. vonmon, Dick Longbridge, Mr Laurence and 10 others 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cros Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 ∆∆ It would hardly be worth putting your knob away if you owned one of them. Cavcraft, The Moog, JeeExEll and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavcraft Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 ∆∆ It would hardly be worth putting your knob away if you owned one of them. {Throws away bobble cap} Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian_pt Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 Based on a Fairthorpe Electron? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asimo Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 Had a go at drawing the Harrington Munter. Couldn't be bothered to add wipers as would have taken a lot of effort to get right and probably still looked wank.You have just designed the Honda***S600! ***As built for the UK market by Jowett Skut, Aston Martin, Dick Longbridge and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkman Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Junkman will know. He is omnipotent in such matters. Although I'm flattered that my name has been mentioned on several forii regarding this car, I must pass.However, most of the suggestions provided all over the interwebs are bordering ridiculousness,especially for those who know their cars. The car has enough unprofessional touches to outrule it was made by a car maker, even a small scale one.Having said that, whoever cobbled it together in his garden shed had a keen eye for shapes. barrett and Banger Kenny 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HillmanImp Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 Someone claims to have known this car. https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=140&t=1555306&i=2200 Possibly solved or a late April fool. Lankytim, worldofceri, bunglebus and 4 others 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunglebus Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 I was thinking "yeah yeah" but it does sound very plausible HillmanImp 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightBulbFun Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 3 minutes ago, bunglebus said: I was thinking "yeah yeah" but it does sound very plausible the only problem is RAFxxx was issued in May 1953, but the Ford 7Y according to Wikipedia was only produced from 1938-1939 so that does not quite add up as that would be some 14 years late registration madness! (unless the registration mark itself was already a private registration mark by then, but im not sure why someone would transfer it to such an old vehicle then abandon it) JeeExEll, HillmanImp and Dick Longbridge 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Longbridge Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 Intriguing reading. I'd be inclined to assume that 'alfgarnett' is a bored fella who wants to wind up a load of blokes on tinternet though. Why's he not posted since? Why doesn't he give a few more clues about the last remembered address? Who is his 'son' who saw the PH thread and encouraged him to reply? It smells like a gone-off kipper to me. I want to believe it, but the whole scenario has too many ifs and buts for me. HillmanImp and LightBulbFun 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Jude Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 Look, let's be honest. The story sounds plausible, but this is the internet. It can't be believed. In lieu of any other credible evidence, I stand here before you all right now with the answer. It's a new Tesla, the first with Toyota, as a GT86 replacement, from the year 2050 and it's a time travelling Musk looking for some hash. Or a personality. Either way case closed m'lord. HillmanImp 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HillmanImp Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 17 hours ago, LightBulbFun said: the only problem is RAFxxx was issued in May 1953, but the Ford 7Y according to Wikipedia was only produced from 1938-1939 so that does not quite add up as that would be some 14 years late registration madness! (unless the registration mark itself was already a private registration mark by then, but im not sure why someone would transfer it to such an old vehicle then abandon it) Yeah, as soon as I saw the registration thing I thought that's right up your street. Not sure if you can gather any more information from anywhere on that plate or if all leads will be dead now? It does seem to be a hole in the story doesn't it as if it was built in the early60's it wouldn't be very old when it was laid up if it was the type of car that he got wrong and it was actually a 1953 model? LightBulbFun 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightBulbFun Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 23 minutes ago, HillmanImp said: Yeah, as soon as I saw the registration thing I thought that's right up your street. Not sure if you can gather any more information from anywhere on that plate or if all leads will be dead now? It does seem to be a hole in the story doesn't it as if it was built in the early60's it wouldn't be very old when it was laid up if it was the type of car that he got wrong and it was actually a 1953 model? well AF indicates its a Cornwall issued mark, but thats about it in terms of extra info I can provide sadly RAF33 does not turn up on any tools (which would make sense if it came off the road in 1977, as even if it was computerised by 1977 which it could of been, if its been inactive since then/ie seen no activity after 1983, then it would only exist in the DVLA's offline archive) if I was giving the chap the benefit of the doubt, then perhaps rather then a Ford 7Y it could of been a sit up and beg Ford popular or something such which I understand to be a direct descendent of the Ford 7Y and as such outwardly does look quite similar and was in production until 1959(!) otherwise for what its worth RAF32 is curiously on a 1977 Peugeot 504 thats been tax due since 1984, and looks to have had this private registration since either new or very early on (as they started to Date V5's in about 1979) and RAF44 is on a Messy Ferguson that survives still and was registered in May 1953 which backs up what I found for when that registration series was issued HillmanImp, RayMK, Dick Longbridge and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Longbridge Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 Just seen this mentioned again elsewhere. One observation. Many are suggesting the car has been 'shopped into the image. I've just read that the photo was taken from a book titled Buses, Trolleys and Trams which was first published in 1967. Surely that debunks the whole 'it's a photoshop' theory? Looks like it's been discussed in many places, too: https://postcardsforpetrolheads.co.uk/car-mystery/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard_FM Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 It looks like it was done in the old fashioned way, by being cut out with a scalpel & pasted on, with the old woman stuck on to hide things. It's the sort of thing Terry Gilliam would have done for a Monty Python animation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Longbridge Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 The pedestrians are doing a pretty good job of walking around the back of a car which allegedly isn't there. chaseracer, martc, horriblemercedes and 6 others 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghosty Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 discussions of this car have to be the only thing that happens on AS more than modgate Dave_Q 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunglebus Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Even if it is cut/paste, there must have been a car to photograph in the first place - although it could have been shortened with the people hiding the join Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Longbridge Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 59 minutes ago, bunglebus said: Even if it is cut/paste, there must have been a car to photograph in the first place - although it could have been shortened with the people hiding the join You'd need to be really bored/jobless to fart around with that sort of level of trickery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Longbridge Posted July 2, 2022 Share Posted July 2, 2022 Looks like it's still dragging on on the pissarseheads forum... https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=140&t=1555306&p=117 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachie Posted July 2, 2022 Share Posted July 2, 2022 Well, not being one to take no for an answer, I offered the bloke cash money and he gave me an hour to get there as he was leaving for 2 weeks holiday. To cut a long story short,. I am now the proud owner of my very first very french slightly cassé bagnole. I'm not normally one to name cars, but this is called le Merde d'Or. New thread incoming shortly. AnnoyingPentium, Lacquer Peel and HillmanImp 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachie Posted July 2, 2022 Share Posted July 2, 2022 Can somebody move the post above please? Should have been on the shitefest thread! catsinthewelder, HillmanImp, Dick Longbridge and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Pastry Posted July 2, 2022 Share Posted July 2, 2022 3 hours ago, Dick Longbridge said: Looks like it's still dragging on on the pissarseheads forum... https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=140&t=1555306&p=117 It doesn't seem any further forward. The only things you can deduce safely from the photo are that the wheels are 15" diameter and the wheelbase is about 78". This makes it a very small car (a Sprite is 80" wheelbase) and rules out the most common donor vehicle/kit car chassis of the time. It is also unlikely that such a low- slung car would be built on an ex-saloon chassis if the job was done properly, as the chassis rails would intrude too much on the cockpit space. The photo can be dated quite accurately to 1962 from the buses. Incidentally if trying to scale from the leading bus, it is an RTW which is 96" wide. And the photo predates the book by several years so probably wasn't taken specially, but found in a photo library somewhere. There is some obvious retouching under and around the car, so it is quite likely that the car itself has been retouched. Anything else is guesswork. Dick Longbridge 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethj Posted July 3, 2022 Share Posted July 3, 2022 Looks like the answer is on this Facebook group although the bloke has specifically said not to post this on Pistonheads, that makes him a sound chap in my eyes👍 This is a 3D model he’s created and got the proportions from scanning the street and going from there. Mind boggling geekiness level which I love. He’s also found an advert for what is probably the actual car in Autosport magazine from 1964 Image and brain power from Stuart Brown on CAD Car Dick Longbridge 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Pastry Posted July 3, 2022 Share Posted July 3, 2022 In my opinion he has manipulated the proportions to show what he wants it to be. I would like to see the ad referred to. Does it include photos? 1964 Autosport, probably not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethj Posted July 3, 2022 Share Posted July 3, 2022 2 hours ago, Mr Pastry said: In my opinion he has manipulated the proportions to show what he wants it to be. I would like to see the ad referred to. Does it include photos? 1964 Autosport, probably not. It doesn’t include photos, nor does it include the line “it will be in that obscure book about buses and on Pistonheads one day” so it’s all circumstantial I suppose. Mr Pastry 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now