Jump to content

Eye-catching black and whites


forddeliveryboy

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, JeeExEll said:

^  Aye, those gorgeous Fiat 124 coupes were popular too.  Twin cam 5-speed, priced a little bit more than a 3-litre Capri.

This looks like a cross between a Fiat 131 and a HA Viva.

yHoGRjr.jpg

I do wonder if that Rome photo might have been taken as part of the 124 coupe launch event, or something. It seems a lot of a coincidence to have 3 of them in the same shot, yet no other newish  or nice cars, even other Fiats. As you say they weren't cheap , even in Italy . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Austin 1800 - I think this is the Pininfarina design that was rejected by BMC in favour of their own design - that they then got Pininfarina to tidy up.

Another car the market did not really want with predictable smaller than projected sales. They probably never made any real money out of them.

Up against the Cortina and significantly more expensive to buy and run - did not really stand a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, lesapandre said:

Austin 1800 - I think this is the Pininfarina design that was rejected by BMC in favour of their own design - that they then got Pininfarina to tidy up.

Another car the market did not really want with predictable smaller than projected sales. They probably never made any real money out of them.

Up against the Cortina and significantly more expensive to buy and run - did not really stand a chance.

Yep the 1800 was so good in many ways but just didn't hit the mark with the punters. Part of the trouble was Issigonis, no doubting the guy was an engineering genius but he was very single minded/stubborn when it came to the design & features of cars. This worked great with the Mini & the 1100 (although thankfully Pininfarina styled the 1100) but didn't translate well into bigger cars as basically they were very similar to a Mini inside (space is great but a dashboard similar to a Mini & controls you can't reach ain't acceptable on a big car). The steering was also heavy & the car looked ungainly. Plus advanced engineering comes at a price.

Unfortunately IMO you can really see the 1800 as being the point where things started to go wrong with BMC . A pity as it is basically a great car but like so many others unfortunately missed its target market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You hit the nail on the head - absolutely. A great concept but the 1800 engine was too thirsty and the car, at the time, slightly too big for the market segment - thats and lots of other things led to really disappointing sales. Great bit of design but flawed.

Another what if...the Farina look makes for a more desirable car IMHO.

Issigonis and co did very little market or in-depth prototype testing - did not seem to be the BMC way.  There were reliablity and quality problems too.

Friends had on in the 60's so travelled a bit in it. Heavyweight steering and an interior as austere as a Trappist  monastery I recall. Fuel consumption pretty dire - they only kept it a shortish time and replaced with a 1300GT which they did like a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...