Jump to content

MG6 Test drive...Now with added Clarkson - Page 4


RedSparrow

Recommended Posts

The styling of the car was led by talented British Design Director Tony Williams-Kenny, educated at none other than Coventry University.

 

Well, talented is very obviously in the eyes of the beer-holder, but at least I now know which University to veto out, should my kids decide they want to study industrial design.

Coventry is one of the best for Transport Design, their course has always been good and they've got a pretty good result of pushing graduates into good jobs too.

 

Aside from that, meh. Shame for the employees but I wonder if MG/Rover/BL will always be doomed in the UK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that MG6 in the auction is the first i've seen that doesn't have stickers all over the side saying "THE NEW MG6!!" I think it's a real shame it hasn't sold well but from the one's i've seen they look outdated already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a blue one round here with a personal plate on it, JN62 JAT or something like that, driven by an old giffer, which, apart from three Enterprise rental cars, is the only one I've ever seen on the road. They will be Talbot Tagora rare in 30 years time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a blue one round here with a personal plate on it, JN62 JAT or something like that, driven by an old giffer, which, apart from three Enterprise rental cars, is the only one I've ever seen on the road. They will be Talbot Tagora rare in 30 years time.

There is a red one up my way. I had a nose around it a while back and, for the money, its got to be a joke.

The only possible reason for buying one and not buying a whole plethora of other makes that are far better looking/built AND cheaper is the idea that its "British" coz its an MG.

I suspect the auctioned car will be bought by a dealer/collector and mothballed because the venture will fail and the car will become a curio in years to come.

Mind you anybody that did the same with the Rover City car obviously spunked their money away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well my opinion for what its worth is this.......

 

The M.G of old that we know and love is a different thing to the new one.......COMPLETLEY. Im not talking about companies but market's. What i mean is M.G was always a sports subsidury of a mainstream manufacturer i.e Morris - BMC -BLMC - A.R etc and NOT a manufacturer in thier own right.

 

The market M.G had was the sports market.....a niche market.

The market M.G want now is the mainstreem market.......a different beast entirley and customers of the mainstreem market have had no experience of the marque so M.G had to do something very different/special to get the markets attension.....it did'nt

The sports car market wants a sports car so i suppose most of the above applies to that too.

 

Do i like the M.G6? Its ok to look at but its the badging. i think a car should have a name not a number ( and a new one Magnette is so twee. The retro thing is sooo 1990s)

The M.G3 looks better and MAY have a chance in the Fiat 500 type of market.....I say MAY!

 

OH AND M.G ADVERTISE THE THINGS!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The MG6 doesn't look any worse than a Hyundai or Kia. Both those have 90% nailed the "european" look and can be mistaken for a more expensive brand, and I've seen MG6s on the road and thought it was perhaps one of those Toyota/Subaru things. Maybe that's because I expect to see one of those more than an MG (There's one locally that's sponsoring a cycling team, and I've seen three non-stickered ones on the road), but I don't think it's a bad effort.

 

Sorry, I forgot - all new cars look shit. Obv.

 

£17k isn''t bad for a car of that spec. I might even pay a visit to the dealer up the road as it's a bit unfair to comment without having parked my arse in one.... but then some of the critisisms that Clarkson has seem like he's scraping the bottom of the insult barrel. Cupholders are a bit unwieldy? Whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was one plonked outside a local supermarket with some half-hearted sales dweeb who couldn't be arsed to get off his phone to talk to anyone a few months back that I had a brief nosey about in. It was shite, particularly inside.

It might look OK in the pictures but it's like comparing a Dixons own brand stereo with a Sony one, without the MG being a quarter of the price of the Mondeo. I cannot imagine why anyone in the UK would buy one, even over a Kia/Hyundai type car unless it was Dacia cheap.

 

I've seen more Veyrons on the road than I have MG6s, they have been a catastrophic failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I quite like the MG6, it looks reasonably handsome for a new car, and drives well by most accounts. It just needs a more modern, frugal pez engine. At least it's not another boring VAG car on the road.

There's a fair bit of Chinese content in most new cars, they just don't advertise the fact.

Buying any new car is pissing money down the drain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any truth in the idea that SAIC only bother with the UK so that the cars can be sold in China as European and therefore better than the 'only sold in China' home-market crap?

 

I read it on one of the other forums and it seems to make as much sense as anything else.

 

I've heard that theory bandied about that the car is marketed over here so the Chinese home market can enjoy the perceived 'Halo-Effect' of the car being one from the European market.

 

That might be true, then again it also sounds like some dreadfully paternalistic bullshit.

 

Its hard to judge, but then the China market is very different to here and those sorts of perceptions might carry some sway, but what is abundantly clear is there doesn't seem to be any desire for MG to take actually selling cars in any meaningful numbers seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^All this comes from people who love shite like Yugo, Polonez, Lada Etc.

I challenge someone real on here to actually sit in one and maybe even drive one. Then the truth will come out :evil::evil::)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^All this comes from people who love shite like Yugo, Polonez, Lada Etc.

I challenge someone real on here to actually sit in one and maybe even drive one. Then the truth will come out :evil::evil::)

 

Already working on it.

 

I (and seemingly only I) actually quite like the look of these and judging by the way prices are tumbling, it won't be too long before they are sat squarely in my price bracket of about £20. Add the aready mentioned observation that these are the Talbot Tagoras of the future and that when you go to the MG website the first thing on there is a rolling flash banner advertising that you can 'Test drive the MG6 for a free dinner.' They must be getting desperate if they feel they have to start attracting hobos and students to drive their cars with the promise of free food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^All this comes from people who love shite like Yugo, Polonez, Lada Etc.

I challenge someone real on here to actually sit in one and maybe even drive one. Then the truth will come out :evil::evil::)

 

Like I said, I've sat in one and that was enough, believe me. :wink:

And while I may like the idea of a Lada or a Yugo as a fun old crate to tool about in occasionally there's no way I'd entertain one as an everyday car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a fair bit of Chinese content in most new cars, they just don't advertise the fact.

 

This. A lot more parts are sourced from China than people realise.

 

Some of the motoring journo response to this reminds me of articles from the 60's and early 70's criticising Japanese cars. People believed that they would never get better and Japan would never get a strong foothold in the European and US car markets. Then in the late 70's and 80's suddenly Japan were building some of the most reliable cars in the world and taking Detroit in particular to the cleaners.

 

Give it a decade and I bet at least two or three of the best selling UK cars will be Chinese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only seen a few MG6s, to me they look like somebody shortsighted copied a crayon picture of an Insignia drawn by a blind kid.

 

The MG looks gawky, it looks too narrow and sits too high and of the very few I've seen on the road two were sitting on the hard shoulder of the M6, broken.

 

Also, £18k new, £7k a year old... these things will be sub-£500 snotters before you know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a fair bit of Chinese content in most new cars, they just don't advertise the fact.

 

This. A lot more parts are sourced from China than people realise.

 

Some of the motoring journo response to this reminds me of articles from the 60's and early 70's criticising Japanese cars. People believed that they would never get better and Japan would never get a strong foothold in the European and US car markets. Then in the late 70's and 80's suddenly Japan were building some of the most reliable cars in the world and taking Detroit in particular to the cleaners.

 

Give it a decade and I bet at least two or three of the best selling UK cars will be Chinese.

Some of those early Jap imports in the 60s were light years ahead of what we were making, surely?

The Honda S800 was 100 times better than a MG Midget, for example.

Some of those cars came with equipment like radios and HRWs and were competitively priced.

They had better build quality and manufacturing techniques, it was never a case of if but of when they would be accepted by the British motoring public.

It certainly wasnt anything to do with their cars being inferior.

IIRC, we exported Austin Sevens to japan in the 30s so they must have been pretty clued up about what to build and how to build it long before they started exporting to us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh for sure, we'll be buying complete Chinese built cars within 10 years, and they'll be the equal of any of the Jap/Korean things that fly out the showrooms just now. :wink:

People automatically assume that Chinese build = shit. This isn't necessarily the case.

The problem is at the moment that China builds the cheapo shit for people who want the cheapest of the cheap, 'and can we have it at a huge discount but make it look expensive'. So they're slightly bling-y but the quality is really poor when you get up close.

 

Ask the Chinese to build a proper car with a decent budget to sell at proper money and very quickly they'll produce something the equal of anyone else's product.

One of the many problems that MG thing has (apart from the name, it should never have been given a British badge IMO, far too much baggage) is that they're trying to sell it far too dear. Make them £7995-£9995 out the showroom and they'll have a chance.

I keep seeing more and more of these Dacia things, I was out today and saw two Sanderos and a Duster, so cheapo cars will sell well enough if they are actually cheap to buy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of those early Jap imports in the 60s were light years ahead of what we were making, surely?

The Honda S800 was 100 times better than a MG Midget, for example.

Some of those cars came with equipment like radios and HRWs and were competitively priced.

They had better build quality and manufacturing techniques, it was never a case of if but of when they would be accepted by the British motoring public.

It certainly wasnt anything to do with their cars being inferior.

IIRC, we exported Austin Sevens to japan in the 30s so they must have been pretty clued up about what to build and how to build it long before they started exporting to us?

 

Boring story [gallopinghorse/train zone...] :!:

 

After the war the US reckoned trade would get Japan going again... and building cars.

 

Jap tech students visited Detroit to get the Goss on how it's done...

 

Question. How long to change press tooling on line?

Answer. Ohh..8hrs!

Question. Lot of downtime for line?

Answer. Well...we run 14 days on R/h fenders, then 14 days on L/h fenders.... not a problem really.....

 

Japs go home.... they produce cars in a tight 'circle' and have little steel to spread around SO >> they introduce 'DowelPin' locators for all their tooling... down time to change a line is about 20/30 minutes...

 

yes, the Japs certainly caught on fast!

 

AFAIK TrooStory :wink:

 

tooSavvy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As i see it there's two kinds of manufacturing in China.

 

There are western companies who go out there with exacting blueprints and have things made in Chinese factories under the supervision of a handful of there own employees.

These products are of a perfectly acceptable standard for western consumption (I'm typing with one such product now).

 

The unfortunate side effect of this is when the dodgy bloke in the office runs the blueprints through the photocopier and takes them to his even dodgier back street mate.

Now rather than taking advantage of the hundreds of thousands that the western company has spent on product development, the dodgy back street types will whip up something that looks vaguely the same but make the important structural bits out of crete paper or some such don't-give-a-shit action.

All the chinese products (i.e. made and designed in China by the Chinese) I have had my hands on, whether copies or not have been very poorly made and riddled with schoolboy errors which more than negated their reduced price.

 

This begs the question of whether the Chinese don't know any better or they consider it ok to chuck out poorly made crap.

 

Has decades of communism oppressed innovation out of the people or have the smart people left the country.

 

Here's an example.

This is a body-to-chassis mount on a great wall steed, its only 6 months old!

 

8937500177_bdd8efcfae_c.jpg

Bracket by Tayne, on Flickr

 

Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That does look pretty shonky. But Chinese companies in other fields are building competitive products, look at Lenovo for instance (granted they did buy IBM's laptop operations). One of the problems with the MG6 is it was designed during the 2000s as the Rover 45 replacement and as such was probably initially styled in about 2004. Progress was probably pretty slow during the MGR days (because the management - I use the word in its loosest sense - wasted time and the BMW dowry on pointless vanity projects like the SV supercar thing and the V8s). After the MGR bankruptcy and subsequent argy-bargy amongst the Chinese about who owned what just lengthened the whole development time to about a decade. As a result it looks about 5 years old when new. Now so did Kias a few years ago and Dacias now, difference is those brands are/were about simple cars at bargain prices whereas MG are over priced by a considerable degree, the CityRover self delusion all over again. I sat in a MG6 at PoL in April, the interior is frankly fairly horrible. They must be better to drive than Clarkson says because Autocar and Car say they are OK, but with the general air of cheapness and the ridicoulous overpricing, they are on to a hiding to nothing in the UK / Europe at the moment. Since Motorpoint are advertising 12 plate Insignia SRI CDTi's for £11995 currently (as an example), who on earth is going to pay more than that for something that looks like a cheap copy of one? As for the higher spec MG6's being listed at £21k, that's new Mondeo/Insignia/Passat/508 territory. Madness :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ That! Or any other Offroad-car with a frame. They all come completely naked without any rustprotection from the factory.

 

And this is how it looks after 10 years without care and without additional rust-protection:

 

l2002.jpg

 

L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have only ever seen a MG6 over here once. That was an 11-plate on holiday when nearly new. As far as I know there are none registered here, and certainly nobody acting as dealer.

 

My wife traded in her 2008 TF last year after it became obvious that all the carefully ironed-out design flaws from the original MGF had been usurped by comedy new faults largely down to poor component quality. Recalls on front and rear suspension, leaks through some rear light cluster seals that were vastly inferior to those latterly fitted by MG Rover, intermittent groans and squeaks from the pedals, a fibreglass hardtop that let more water in than the convertible roof did, a washer pump that worked when it felt like it... and every unpainted nut and bolt completely brown after less than three years.

 

And it was orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I actually meant about the GW Steed was the u-shaped bracket from body to chassis being made of three pieces of varying thickness, shape and curvature leading to several rust traps on that one assembly.

 

The picture Lukas has posted shows that a 1 piece bracket of a thickness equal to the 3 pieces has survived 10 years.

 

Given that that have the latest Hi-Luxes to steal ideas from I should be shocked to find durability comparable to that of a wet newspaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...