Jump to content

Talbot

Staff
  • Posts

    7,451
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Reputation Activity

  1. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from chaseracer in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
  2. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from AnthonyG in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    None, until you've confirmed that the first time you pull away the engine, front subframe and bulkhead isn't going to rip away from the rest of the car and bugger off down the road on it's own, leaving you sat in the remains of the car looking out into fresh air.

  3. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from JakeT in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    None, until you've confirmed that the first time you pull away the engine, front subframe and bulkhead isn't going to rip away from the rest of the car and bugger off down the road on it's own, leaving you sat in the remains of the car looking out into fresh air.

  4. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from LightBulbFun in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
  5. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from richardmorris in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
  6. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from Mrs6C in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
  7. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from Mrs6C in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    None, until you've confirmed that the first time you pull away the engine, front subframe and bulkhead isn't going to rip away from the rest of the car and bugger off down the road on it's own, leaving you sat in the remains of the car looking out into fresh air.

  8. Haha
    Talbot reacted to beko1987 in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    Pfft, small details 😂
  9. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from Floatylight in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    None, until you've confirmed that the first time you pull away the engine, front subframe and bulkhead isn't going to rip away from the rest of the car and bugger off down the road on it's own, leaving you sat in the remains of the car looking out into fresh air.

  10. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from wuvvum in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    None, until you've confirmed that the first time you pull away the engine, front subframe and bulkhead isn't going to rip away from the rest of the car and bugger off down the road on it's own, leaving you sat in the remains of the car looking out into fresh air.

  11. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from LightBulbFun in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    None, until you've confirmed that the first time you pull away the engine, front subframe and bulkhead isn't going to rip away from the rest of the car and bugger off down the road on it's own, leaving you sat in the remains of the car looking out into fresh air.

  12. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from richardmorris in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    None, until you've confirmed that the first time you pull away the engine, front subframe and bulkhead isn't going to rip away from the rest of the car and bugger off down the road on it's own, leaving you sat in the remains of the car looking out into fresh air.

  13. Haha
    Talbot reacted to hairnet in Six Cylinders Motoring Notes   
    clear your history fuck sake
  14. Like
    Talbot got a reaction from GrumpiusMaximus in Unpopular Motoring Opinion Thread   
    One of the major benefits is that in slippery conditions they are more stable in a straight line.  In ice and snow, a FWD car is somewhat more controllable than a RWD one.  That is, for the average (IE utterly incompetent) driver.  Yes, I prefer a RWD car in the snow, mainly for the LOLs, but FWD is proven safer.
    Also for interior space.  A RWD car loses a surprising amount of interior space compared to the equivalent FWD arrangement.
  15. Agree
    Talbot got a reaction from 5speedracer in Unpopular Motoring Opinion Thread   
    An unpopular opinion:  Drivers should be re-tested on a regular basis, and to a far higher standard than they are currently.  This is actually more important than checking the car on an annual basis.
    However, this will never happen as the Government makes far too much money from fuel duty and other vehicle taxation, so removing dangerous/idiotic/incompetent/blind/drunk/thick-as-shit drivers from the road will cost them too much money.
    I would happily sit a driving test on a regular basis.
  16. Like
    Talbot got a reaction from Rust Collector in Unpopular Motoring Opinion Thread   
    One of the major benefits is that in slippery conditions they are more stable in a straight line.  In ice and snow, a FWD car is somewhat more controllable than a RWD one.  That is, for the average (IE utterly incompetent) driver.  Yes, I prefer a RWD car in the snow, mainly for the LOLs, but FWD is proven safer.
    Also for interior space.  A RWD car loses a surprising amount of interior space compared to the equivalent FWD arrangement.
  17. Like
    Talbot got a reaction from Joey spud in Unpopular Motoring Opinion Thread   
    An unpopular opinion:  Drivers should be re-tested on a regular basis, and to a far higher standard than they are currently.  This is actually more important than checking the car on an annual basis.
    However, this will never happen as the Government makes far too much money from fuel duty and other vehicle taxation, so removing dangerous/idiotic/incompetent/blind/drunk/thick-as-shit drivers from the road will cost them too much money.
    I would happily sit a driving test on a regular basis.
  18. Agree
    Talbot got a reaction from CaptainBoom in Unpopular Motoring Opinion Thread   
    An unpopular opinion:  Drivers should be re-tested on a regular basis, and to a far higher standard than they are currently.  This is actually more important than checking the car on an annual basis.
    However, this will never happen as the Government makes far too much money from fuel duty and other vehicle taxation, so removing dangerous/idiotic/incompetent/blind/drunk/thick-as-shit drivers from the road will cost them too much money.
    I would happily sit a driving test on a regular basis.
  19. Agree
    Talbot got a reaction from brownnova in Opinions on thread deletion…let’s try again…   
    No it hasn't.  People have gone back and deleted long standing threads, or deleted all their posts in a thread, making bits of it unreadable.  We had a fairly significant thought process on ensuring that all photos remain visible on old threads as otherwise they become unreadable, the same should (IMO) be true of comments and posts.  When you remove parts of the conversation, it makes no sense.
    Yes, posts need to be able to be edited for spelling and other errors for a while, but once it's been up for a bit, IMO it should stay.  It's "published" at that point.
  20. Agree
    Talbot got a reaction from Matty in Opinions on thread deletion…let’s try again…   
    No it hasn't.  People have gone back and deleted long standing threads, or deleted all their posts in a thread, making bits of it unreadable.  We had a fairly significant thought process on ensuring that all photos remain visible on old threads as otherwise they become unreadable, the same should (IMO) be true of comments and posts.  When you remove parts of the conversation, it makes no sense.
    Yes, posts need to be able to be edited for spelling and other errors for a while, but once it's been up for a bit, IMO it should stay.  It's "published" at that point.
  21. Agree
    Talbot got a reaction from loserone in Opinions on thread deletion…let’s try again…   
    No it hasn't.  People have gone back and deleted long standing threads, or deleted all their posts in a thread, making bits of it unreadable.  We had a fairly significant thought process on ensuring that all photos remain visible on old threads as otherwise they become unreadable, the same should (IMO) be true of comments and posts.  When you remove parts of the conversation, it makes no sense.
    Yes, posts need to be able to be edited for spelling and other errors for a while, but once it's been up for a bit, IMO it should stay.  It's "published" at that point.
  22. Agree
    Talbot reacted to worldofceri in Opinions on thread deletion…let’s try again…   
    It’s not ‘your’ thread though is it? Even if you started it, you only have ownership of your own contribution, not other people’s replies.
  23. Like
    Talbot got a reaction from Gabriall in Shitefest Shropshire 12-14th July   
    116 pages (and counting) of the little furry bastards*
    (I owned two until quite recently.  Just one now)
  24. Like
    Talbot got a reaction from Coprolalia in Bangerfest (now Rustival Thread)   
    I shall echo all of the above comments, as they are very much in line with my experience.
    The comment that I did not have the same experience needs expanding on:
    I simply did not appreciate that the procedure here was to pay for a Gaydon ticket, and then you had to book something extra on a completely unrelated platform.  I did not watch any youtube videos about this process, as I do not subscribe to any of the youtube-based organisers of this event.  I've very little interest in youtube subscriptions tbh.  Equally, I don't do Facebook for very much more than local marketplace, hence did not read anything on there about the booking process.  As far as I was concerned I'd paid my money for a ticket, and that was that.  I'm there for the show, not the Anti-Social Media experience.
    The blokey checking tickets on the way in (after absolutely no queue, which is bloody excellent!) was remarkably non-understanding of this, as when pressed for "where are you parking?", my reply was "I've no idea, that's up to you isn't it??".  After a somewhat drawn out back-and-forth, I got a remarkably rude "well, I'll let you in, but next time, fucking sort yourself out will you"
    Quite frankly I'd have happily run him over after a comment like that.
    As it happens, I had every intention of needing to pay for my additional passenger, but I never did in the end.  Even the blokey on the museum desk didn't want to take my cash.  So I spent it on other things at the event.
    Excellent event.  Much more laid-back and pleasant compared to FOTU.  Youtube stage with amplified people was easily avoided and I met a lot of friends I haven't seen in a very long time.  It was quite remarkable spotting how many (mainly Citroen BXs) cars had been on my driveway some 15-20 years ago.
    Only other comment was my not really understanding why some sub-5-year-old cars were in the display areas.  I'm glad there's no strict age limits, but a BrandNewCar is rather pointless being "displayed" in a slot where something MuchMoreInteresting could be.
    But I will definitely be back.  Especially if the booking method is simplified.
  25. Haha
    Talbot got a reaction from RoverFolkUs in Shitefest Shropshire 12-14th July   
    If you've never set fire to a car while welding, you're just not getting enough heat into the weld.  Try cleaning the metal back further and stepping up to the next power level.  Maybe a bit more wire feed speed too.
    .. and I totally did not* set fire to the Merc C250td on the driveway a couple of days ago.  Nope.  Not me.  Never.
    Briefly.
×
×
  • Create New...