Jump to content

Dyb, dyb, dyb, DAB, DAB, DAB


martybabes

Recommended Posts

Im considering one of the many Chinese " Factory Fit Sat nav/ stereo " copy, units that are all over eBay, Amazon etc

We've got a very factory looking thing in an e46 BMW , that doesn't have DAB , but has everything else, including a reversing camera with guide markings that go into the sky!

So it shouldn't look too bad( I hate wires or anything non- standard cluttering car interiors.

My concern is that the only good thing about my Passat is the Bluetooth music streaming from my phone, so is it possible to get a DAB thing that's any good that will use this system to play in the car .

My experience with some very expensive cars with factory DAB is that at best it's patchy so not expecting miracles,, just the ability to listen to 4 extra occaisionaly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im considering one of the many Chinese " Factory Fit Sat nav/ stereo " copy, units that are all over eBay, Amazon etc

We've got a very factory looking thing in an e46 BMW , that doesn't have DAB , but has everything else, including a reversing camera with guide markings that go into the sky!

So it shouldn't look too bad( I hate wires or anything non- standard cluttering car interiors.

My concern is that the only good thing about my Passat is the Bluetooth music streaming from my phone, so is it possible to get a DAB thing that's any good that will use this system to play in the car .

My experience with some very expensive cars with factory DAB is that at best it's patchy so not expecting miracles,, just the ability to listen to 4 extra occaisionaly.

Same boat, a Chinese android mechless stereo is high on my want list as I'll get the moon on a stick without wires and cheap.....

 

My dad works in electronics though and says my car will go on fire and many nuns will die

 

Sent from my TA-1012 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just installed one of those Majority devices in my own van and use it through the aux socket in the glove box. I have been very happy with it so far, I seem to do my driving on a Sunday when there's cock all on FM so having the extra stations is a boon. I'm getting into Talk Sport at the moment. I wish I had bought one earlier.

 

There is a DAB stereo in the work Citroen Relay and it is useless. I was driving back from Ipswich the other day, thought I'd listen to 6 music and discovered that the reception was rubbish. I don't seem to have any problems with the OE system in my Focus or the one I installed in my own van. Must be a Citroen/Peugeot/Fiat thing.

Is it a reasonably new Relay ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently bought one of these Majority DAB adaptors on the recommedation of a colleague for the princely sum of £34.95.

 

Journey-Image-07-F1.jpg

 

 

I haven't installed it properly yet, but I tried it out with everything just balanced on top of the dash and it seemed to work really well.

What's more, I could pay using PayPal and it arrived double quick chop by courier, so I was well chuffed M8

4 of my vehicles don't have a radio, or even a place to put one in, but I like the look of this thing. If I were to purchase one could the output simply be stuck up the auxhole of a Bluetooth speaker? Those things sound pretty loud, at least the decent ones do, and all from such a tiny box. I'm suspicious that it might be a trick and that loud in the house might not be loud over the wheezing of a 1950's car, but its a very tempting way to save the bother of fitting speakers. What do you reckon?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DAB is a con, as pillock said most stations are in mono/low bitrate so sound as flat as hell compared to FM, so its proof that if you tell people something is newer/better they believe it even if it is noticeably worse

 

I have DAB in the car but only really bother when I fancy a bit of Absolute 80s

 

DAB has been around since the 90s and its only really now that its fitted to most new cars that it actually seems to be taking off, but there's still only around 30% of the radio listening population using it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DAB is a con, as pillock said most stations are in mono/low bitrate so sound as flat as hell compared to FM, so its proof that if you tell people something is newer/better they believe it even if it is noticeably worse

 

I have DAB in the car but only really bother when I fancy a bit of Absolute 80s

 

DAB has been around since the 90s and its only really now that its fitted to most new cars that it actually seems to be taking off, but there's still only around 30% of the radio listening population using it

 

62% claim to own one.  Unless half own one but never listen to it.

 

Yes, the bitrate levels are poor.  With MP2 encoding (reserve of the early 90s) you need at least 192kbps to match FM.  But, as you know yourself, ask 100 right minded people if they want more choice or more fidelity, the majority will chose the former.  Myself included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why couldn't they invest in a solution that provides both? My rather limited understanding is simply that a high bitrate, stereo station takes more bandwidth and there's only a small amount to go around. Is this a limitation of DAB+ itself or something that will get better as other things turn off and the bandwidth expands?

 

I'm a minority, I simply can't listen if it's crap quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why couldn't they invest in a solution that provides both? My rather limited understanding is simply that a high bitrate, stereo station takes more bandwidth and there's only a small amount to go around. Is this a limitation of DAB+ itself or something that will get better as other things turn off and the bandwidth expands?

 

I'm a minority, I simply can't listen if it's crap quality.

 

DAB took so bloody long to develop that by the time it was launched in the late 90s, it was already using legacy technology (MP2 compression).  If you're the same age as I am, you'll remember that mp3 was already standard by then when it came to music sharing - so they were already off the pace. 

 

That said, there's nothing inherently wrong with mp2 - it's just inefficient.  So you've the choice of putting approximately 8 stations on at 192kbps (same as Radio 3 and FM equivalent) or many more at a lower bitrate which most people will tolerate.  That generates the multiplex owners more money, and offers commercial radio operators the opportunity to generate more revenue.  Whilst DAB+ uses AAC compression and is far more efficient (you need approximately half the bandwidth to achieve the same result) a lot of recievers can't decode it.  Stations don't want to 'invest' in something that immediately limits their potential audience.

 

Since the IBA was abolished in 1990, audio standards have dropped significantly.  You can now put a radio studio wherever you want (in fact there are now examples of radio stations that have no 'base' - it's all in the cloud) where once before you had to build to IBA standards.  Even dynamic processing was a breach of code once upon a time!  Nowadays, the audience and the broadcaster decide what is and what isn't acceptable.  Poor technical standards are a frustration for a lot of people (not just anoraks) but i think we've found a relatively good compromise.  A good deal of listening is done on small speakers (38% of all listening is on devices not called a 'radio) so 80k mp2 sounds fine on a laptop/phone/portable unit.

 

As for a solution that provides both?  The future of radio has, for a long time, been 'multi-platform'.  FM/DAB/Streaming/Social/Video - so it's sort of resolving itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the insight BI :-)

 

I actually think the standards are a good thing, perhaps not quite so tight as to say where you can and can't broadcast from but to guarantee quality it's useful to have some rules.

 

I've been listening to Primordial Radio for about a year, they call themselves radio but are online only (they have their own app, web player, TuneIn etc). Whilst it's nice that they could do this - the only reason they went this route was that Team Rock Radio where they used to work couldn't afford to be on DAB any more - it does mean that sometimes, it goes off air or struggles a bit because nobody is enforcing any rules.

 

It's an interesting model, I'm paying £6 a month for essentially one station as are about 1400 other people so they're making money without adverts. Whether that's enough to pay presenters remains to be seen, they've got three paid and the rest volunteer I think.

 

Anyway, apologies for the thread swerve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The massive choice available now (on DAB and TuneIn) is really attractive. I'm also a bit of a HiFi perfectionist but I'm less bothered in the car - over road noise and through cheap 16 year old speakers I'm not going to notice a difference in quality.

 

Sorry, I'm sure that post was going somewhere but it ended up a slightly disconnected thought...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The massive choice available now (on DAB and TuneIn) is really attractive. I'm also a bit of a HiFi perfectionist but I'm less bothered in the car - over road noise and through cheap 16 year old speakers I'm not going to notice a difference in quality.

 

Sorry, I'm sure that post was going somewhere but it ended up a slightly disconnected thought...

 

 

Still doesn't stop me from playing with the EQ and L/R balance...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

62% claim to own one.  Unless half own one but never listen to it.

 

Yes, the bitrate levels are poor.  With MP2 encoding (reserve of the early 90s) you need at least 192kbps to match FM.  But, as you know yourself, ask 100 right minded people if they want more choice or more fidelity, the majority will chose the former.  Myself included.

 

I am in that 62%, I have four DAB capable radios at home! I never use them for DAB, but I have them.

 

In the UK, 50.9% of all radio listening hours by the first quarter of 2018 were through digital platforms, with DAB making up for the majority of digital radio listening (72.3%), and 63.7% of UK households claim to have access to a DAB radio set. However in the second quarter, digital listening had dropped back to 50.2%

 

After 23 years, DAB has achieved 72% of 50% of radio listening. Pack it in, boys. Give the spectrum to the mobile phone companies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I am in that 62%, I have four DAB capable radios at home! I never use them for DAB, but I have them.

 

 

After 23 years, DAB has achieved 72% of 50% of radio listening. Pack it in, boys. Give the spectrum to the mobile phone companies.

Is the 200 MHz band of much interest to them?

 

I don’t know much about who uses what spectrum wise these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't pick up absolute classic rock in Oxfordshire, which is annoying as dad gets it in lincs and it's quite good

 

Listen online? or are you talking in the car?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...