Jump to content

Cavcraft 2017: Another day, ANOTHER Rover!


Cavcraft

Recommended Posts

At work, bored, checking eBay on 'phone. Half-arsedly read advert, struggle to see half-arsed pictures properly, put half-arsed offer in (with covering note) then wait. Not many minutes later, we're on:

 

 

roverchange.jpg

roverchange2.jpg

roverchange3.jpg

 

It's only a flipping 1.1! Doesn't seem to have a sunroof, stereo looks like the original one, only 3 doors but let down by metallic paint. I'm sad enough to want a completely mingebag version with no options at all, hopefully this isn't far off that.

Not collected it yet, most probs over this bank holiday weekend, and the car is not very far away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A one point... one? In a car that size?!

 

ASTOUNDING.

Yup hard to believe now. But I guess a 1.1 K series uses the same mounts as the bigger variants so not a massive amount of engineering required by the factory, hence no real cost adding it as an option.

 

The 1.1 k series is a lot hardier and less prone to OMGHGF. Its a SOHC lump in spi and mpi flavours, dunno what these were graced with?

 

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another 1 for the collection?

 

Why take the engine out to do the clutch then not put it back in? The mind boggles. Thanks for the link though, will message him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're not very big cars and the 211 weighs less than a ton - similar performance to a Fiesta 1.3 or Corsa 1.2 of the era.

Aye. Rovers mistake was to pitch the R3 200 against the Astra and Escort when it should have been up against the Fiesta and Corsa price wise. It was originally destined to wear a Rover 100 badge.

 

2f02f715cf7061ae3ea302909635ece2.jpg

 

Good little cars all the same. I'd like a top spec 216 with the wood n' leatherz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup hard to believe now. But I guess a 1.1 K series uses the same mounts as the bigger variants so not a massive amount of engineering required by the factory, hence no real cost adding it as an option.

 

The 1.1 k series is a lot hardier and less prone to OMGHGF. Its a SOHC lump in spi and mpi flavours, dunno what these were graced with?

 

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

 

My understanding (gained from the internet - so possibly wrong) is that ALL K series have the same block so that a 1.1 SOHC can be replaced by a 1.8 VVTi without "much" of a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding (gained from the internet - so possibly wrong) is that ALL K series have the same block so that a 1.1 SOHC can be replaced by a 1.8 VVTi without "much" of a problem.

Can I put a single cam head on a 1.8 then? (For authentic 1965 vehicle performance simulation)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well today was double collection day.

 

Thankfully, we set off pretty handy (about 08.30, I think) to cross the border and head to Colwyn Bay. The A55 was quite busy, but not as busy as it got later when it was the normal bank holiday stupidity. Anyhow, the Clio was ok, the seller said his friend who had owned the car mentioned the fuel gauge not working but they'd put half a tank's worth in. I topped it to be on the safe side to get me home. Upon return my lad lifted the back seat up, wiggled the sender unit and it came back to life revealing half a tank as promised! I think the brakes need something, not much travel on the pedal but something didn't seem 100%, though it did stop, of course.

 

Got home, ten minute tea break, then off to get the Rover. I checked it over (despite the laughably cheap price) and there wasn't a huge amount of water in it. Vendor topped it up from a bottle in the boot (always a bit sus imho) but nothing seemed amiss, so I drove it home. No overheating or smoking and was actually quite nice to drive, felt quite 'solid' on the road and whilst obviously no ball of fire, in top gear it was no real bother on the bypass. Seems quite in-messed with, original stereo at a guess which is pleasing. Body a bit rough, though appears to be more surface rust (fingers crossed) than actual rot.

 

rover211b.jpg

rover211d.jpg

rover211c.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

*LDV tipper isn't mine :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye. Rovers mistake was to pitch the R3 200 against the Astra and Escort when it should have been up against the Fiesta and Corsa price wise. It was originally destined to wear a Rover 100 badge.

 

2f02f715cf7061ae3ea302909635ece2.jpg

 

Good little cars all the same. I'd like a top spec 216 with the wood n' leatherz.

 

 

That's the point at which all of BL/Rover's good work went down the shitter. The R8 was a great car, offering a vastly superior product to shit like the Escort, Astra III and Golf III and for less money - a sound business model that worked. The bubble thing and that pretentious 400 variant was BMW taking the piss and trying to convince us that anything Longbridge/Cowley made was 'prestige'. Rover 400 or a bigger, better made, better handling and riding Mondeo? Righto.

 

No lads, it ain't.  And it backfired spectacularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the look of the bubbles. They seem sort of weirdly 'futuristic in the 1980's' like a prototype that actually came to life. This is 8V, the lad reckoned, had been his granddad's for years and he retired from driving at 83 or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...