Jump to content

The death knell to Rallying.


Pete-M

Recommended Posts

Just had something to eat and thought it'd be a good time to sit down and watch the Portuguese rally on CH4. I've always liked rallying so you can imagine my horror when the announcer said during the ad break before it "Now on CH4, WRC with Jo Caulfield".Jo Caulfield is that blonde 'comedienne' who has the singular honour of never, ever, raising even the slightest chuckle from me. Rare for someone who's appeared on some of my favourite shows - Buzzcocks, QI, HIGNFY, etc.She fucking haunts me, if there's a good telly programme on you can guarantee that the one episode she appears in just won't be funny. I went to the Rawhide Comedy Club in Liverpool a few years ago for a friends birthday, guess who headlined? Yup. Jo fucking Caulfield. Probably the shortest appearance by a headline act as she stood there and failed to raise even the slightest titter from the 300 or so people in the club. After 10 minutes or so she was gone from the stage and people were back laughing at the other acts.Now she's on the fucking WRC. First question from that gormless geezer who normally presents it "So, Jo, do you like rallying?", her answer "not before today I didn't".SO WHY THE FUCK IS SHE THERE? SHE'S NOT FUCKING FUNNY, SHE DOESN'T LIKE RALLYING, AND IF THERE'S A WAY TO FUCK PEOPLE OFF IT'S SIMPLY TO PUT HER ON TELLY.So, there ya go. Rallying is fucked, and it's Jo Caulfields fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too can feel your painI am haunted my the very unfunny Catherine Tate.....she's just not funny, never has been, never will be....she's shit, no she's worse than that......at least she's not doing F1 commentating....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was so incensed that I wrote to Dave to complain. I haven't done that since I complained about the programme announcers and their dick-head comments. They clearly took no notice of that one...Sean Hughes was crap too.Less (un)witty banter, more sodding cars please!EDIT - a bit of positive spin, did like the snippet of Group B at the start. Lunatics everywhere! No wonder so many people got killed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small rant on this topic:Yeah the Dave announcer is fucking shit. I think its that Ian Lee twat whose career seems to be appearing on 'top 100' shows. Also those Cobra beer sponsor ads get on my tits, the ones with 3 c*nts in a pub making un funny jokes.Glad that Five USA have got rid of the filler bits with that other unfunny prick Russel Kane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave have more than one cock-ender announcer; I'm sure one of the others is that twat Tom Ford, you know, that knob who thinks he's funny/Clarkson.

Isn't he that fat ugly prick on Fifth Gear? I'd happily watch it if he wasn't on it. Him and Tiff 'I used to race cars me, here's a video of me racing cars' Needel and Jason 'I used to race BTCC me, I've got loads of money me' Plato. Pair of egotistical personality vacuums, an annoying lefty student, and some screeching harlett in the form of Vicky Butler Henderson.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Jason Plato's not the best presenter,but he's still in the BTCC,& he won a race today in a Chevrolet Lacetti :shock:

Didn't they used to be Daewoos?And to think Ford once spent ten million quid (really, ten million quid) on a single series of BTCC. Just watched the F1 highlights and right at the end that boychild who until recently was introducing Dora The Explorer on CBBC said - and I swear I'm not making this up 'I remember Ken Tyrell saying that any car that finshed first was a good-looking car.' Ken Tyrell!?!? The gormless fucker is about eight years old and - in reality rather than what his Producer tells him to say - probably just about remembers Ralf Schumacker!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if we're going to the the automotive world's grumpy old men, and continuing the F1 rant (though obviously I'm overjoyed that it's back on the Beeb and that The Chain is back as a theme tune)That completely, stupidly over-excited chap who now commentates - often talking all over Brundle when he's trying to explain some technicality, made a wonderful gaff today:Over-excited chap: "He's gone off again!"Brundle: "Er, that's a replay."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over-excited chap: "He's gone off again!"Brundle: "Er, that's a replay."

I haven't watched any of teh F1 yet this year but that quote sounds like it could have been Murray Walker from any time in the last 40 years! Has everyone forgotten how often he'd mess up in eh excitment of it all?!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

F1 today was great, and I suspect I may be watching the rest of the season which is more than I've done for the last few years. Think the last time I was really into it was 1998 or so! Less electronics, more skill and I actually think decent commentary.I also LOL'd at the 'replay' thing although like you said, Walker got away with far dafter gaffes in his time.I did notice something though, I didn't try it but apparently if I'd have pressed the red button during coverage, I could swap to either the Five Live commentary, or the CBBC one - WTF? F1 for the kiddies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually quite like Jonathan Ledgard (he who commentates alongside Brundle) as he does at least know the sport inside out and was always good when he was on 5Live.The young 'anchor' presenter (whose name I don't know or care) seems a bit at sea with it all. Don't see why he got the job, maybe just so they had someone with excessively styled hair in a misguided attempt to drag in a few new viewers.And another thing. Eddie Jordan. Now I like EJ, he seems a decent bloke. But why is it that whenever he's on screen he is awkwardly shifting a load of A4 paper between his hands. It seems a bit like he's just been told 'quick, on screen NOW'.Otherwise, rather liking the BBCs F1 coverage so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just seen an episode and I must admit I'm struggling to see what the problem is? I didn't have a problem with any of the presenters and they seemed to do the job just fine. If we're talking 'death knell's then surely it's the fact almost all marques have abandoned it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just seen an episode and I must admit I'm struggling to see what the problem is? I didn't have a problem with any of the presenters and they seemed to do the job just fine. If we're talking 'death knell's then surely it's the fact almost all marques have abandoned it?

Any excuse to have a go at that wretched Caulfield is enough of an excuse.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too can feel your pain

 

I am haunted my the very unfunny Catherine Tate.....she's just not funny, never has been, never will be....she's shit, no she's worse than that......at least she's not doing F1 commentating....

You have my complete agreement. Seems to appeal to 11-year olds, but for those of us who grew up with the likes of Peter Cook, Ronnie Barker & Dick Emery, this sort of thing is total & complete crap.

 

In the case of rallying, some Public School twonc at UK TV thinks it's not very exciting, I know, let's have a comedian making uninformed comments, that'll liven it up. This is the rot that set in with Clarkson & Co. Because the people involved in making the programme don't know anything about the subject, all they can do is turn it into a 'comedy' so that it will appeal to the Lowest Common Denominator (11-year olds). This is why comedy actors keep making documentaries on things they know nothing about: Paul Merton goes to China, Richard Wilson tries to drive cars with gears, etc. They've run out of jokes, but they're popular so maybe more people will watch this 'difficult' show if it's presented by funny old so-&-so.

 

I'm worried about two disturbing phenomena often noticed in history documentaries: (1) Making old photographs 3-dimensional. They cannot show any still photo without cutting everything out to give a crap toy theatre effect. Water is made to look 'wavy', they might even colour in bits of black-&-white pictures. WHY? We know it's an old photo. We know it's 2-dimensional, we know how to interpret it it, even if it was taken in the 1950s. Just let us look at it; we'll still be listening to your inane commentary jabber. Is this to give the IT person something to do? If he wants to do that, why not just piss off & make those creepy pixar cartoons somewhere?

 

(2) Talking in the present tense. They CANNOT make a history programme without some nitwit, often, tragically, the academic expert on the subject, describing something from long ago as if it was happening right now. 'So Henry discovers that Catherine is having an affair with Lord Effingham and he's very angry. what's he going to do? Well, he's going to put her in the Tower of London, etc., etc.' WTF?!? We KNOW it was 500 years ago. You don't have to give it modern 'relevance'. we are watching the stupid programme, we are interested in the subject, honest.

 

Anyway, that's what I think & I'm sorry about the rallying.

 

Next up, our new 20 part series on the World War Two Holocaust presented by Graham Norton and the late Jade Goody...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...